ARCADE GOON

6y

Aren't you the dude who said it's just a flu bro? You should be really quiet talking about other people being wrong

Smoofer

6y

No, I told someone itt to relax and go to school in the US on January 30th lol

Sixty 5

6y

I know. that wasn't my point, I realize their weekly averages are lower

the point is americans think there is a single date or peak when the lockdowns will end and quarantine will be "over"

this is a marathon and it will take several months heading into summer.

g6ntiana

6y

#OPENAMERICANOW shows pretty good how dumb americans are sometimes

Smoofer

6y

Also you were wrong about the 20% hospitalization rate... keep in mind this is % of confirmed cases which is already skewed because of limited testing (worse symptoms = more likely to have received a test)

The COVID-19–associated hospitalization rate among patients identified through COVID-NET for the 4-week period ending March 28, 2020, was 4.6 per 100,000 popula- tion (Figure 1). Hospitalization rates increased with age, with a rate of 0.3 in persons aged 0–4 years, 0.1 in those aged 5–17 years, 2.5 in those aged 18–49 years, 7.4 in those aged 50–64 years, and 13.8 in those aged ≥65 years. Rates were highest among persons aged ≥65 years, ranging from 12.2 in those aged 65–74 years to 17.2 in those aged ≥85 years.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6915e3.htm

Soo Diff

6y

Day drinking again

Soo Diff

6y

Day drinking again

0

6y

see this is the type of s*** that's so annoying it is worth responding to now that i'm home.

you completely misrepresent what i posted a few weeks ago and do it in a condescending way, without even referencing the original quote

at that time i said 1 in 5 hospitalizations were younger people which turned out to be true.

you turned out to be wrong there too with some table you didn't properly read.

but now you're going to try to argue this point again?

you post this data from the study yet it has nothing to do with the actual demographic data, and these numbers represent a positive numeric testing rate normalized at a per 100,000 population

in the same article if you scroll down literally just 1 more sentence we find the actual data you're misrepresenting, or simply can't wrap your head around to understand

Among the 1,482 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19–associated hospitalizations reported through COVID-NET, six (0.4%) each were patients aged 0–4 years and 5–17 years, 366 (24.7%) were aged 18–49 years, 461 (31.1%) were aged 50–64 years, and 643 (43.4%) were aged ≥65 years.

So look at that, over 25% of hospitalizations were aged 0-49 years old and considered "young"

seriously stop misrepresenting what i post

you are stupid and can't digest stats properly

now don't bother responding to this just take your L again

BLACKSTAR BULLY

6y

S*** starting to become a problem

0

6y

see this is the type of s*** that's so annoying it is worth responding to now that i'm home.

you completely misrepresent what i posted a few weeks ago and do it in a condescending way, without even referencing the original quote

at that time i said 1 in 5 hospitalizations were younger people which turned out to be true.

you turned out to be wrong there too with some table you didn't properly read.

but now you're going to try to argue this point again?

you post this data from the study yet it has nothing to do with the actual demographic data, and these numbers represent a positive numeric testing rate normalized at a per 100,000 population

in the same article if you scroll down literally just 1 more sentence we find the actual data you're misrepresenting, or simply can't wrap your head around to understand

Among the 1,482 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19–associated hospitalizations reported through COVID-NET, six (0.4%) each were patients aged 0–4 years and 5–17 years, 366 (24.7%) were aged 18–49 years, 461 (31.1%) were aged 50–64 years, and 643 (43.4%) were aged ≥65 years.

So look at that, over 25% of hospitalizations were aged 0-49 years old and considered "young"

seriously stop misrepresenting what i post

you are stupid and can't digest stats properly

now don't bother responding to this just take your L again

Sonic Winter

6y

what you sippin brother

Soo Diff

6y

S*** was already a problem I'm f***ed

Soo Diff

6y

S*** was already a problem I'm f***ed

Puma

6y

why are people doing home invasions when majority of people are at home

Soo Diff

6y

Just had two white claws and smoked some weed. Breakfast of champions type s***.

Smoofer

6y

You didn’t say that tho, you said it had a 20% hospitalization rate in general. Remember we argued about the 50% rate for older people being an outlier and making mean a bad way to represent the data? You getting senile?

Smoofer

6y

But you make 200k a year doing data science

Puma

6y

why are people doing home invasions when majority of people are at home

Sixty 5

6y

I know. that wasn't my point, I realize their weekly averages are lower

the point is americans think there is a single date or peak when the lockdowns will end and quarantine will be "over"

this is a marathon and it will take several months heading into summer.

0

6y

You're legit trying to gas light me

I just looked up what you posted again

this is your stupid picture. it takes the total cases and hospital visits.

of the total hospital admits of positive covid, 10% IS YOUNG

20% overall

Among the 1,482 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19–associated hospitalizations reported through COVID-NET, six (0.4%) each were patients aged 0–4 years and 5–17 years, 366 (24.7%) were aged 18–49 years, 461 (31.1%) were aged 50–64 years, and 643 (43.4%) were aged ≥65 years.

From your study you are now citing.

again, TOTAL CONFIRMED CASES , ADMITS

20+%

40% OLD PEOPLE

JUST LIKE MY ALL CAPS POST THAT TRIGGERED YOU A COUPLE WEEKS AGO!

0

6y

you're so bitter i was making that 3 years ago lol enjoy that comp sci degree b**** ass p**** now don't quote me again and just take your L