Didn’t assume s*** I just took what the top post on this page said to be true lol

The burden of proof is not on me to provide you with the links to these studies.

It’s a discussion, go search for them yourself if you actually care about being knowledgeable in the area.

I’m not spending 20 minutes compiling a link of studies searching a database for a KTT user.

You treat this as a debate so you absorb nothing from other people

But you’re asking to search for something, that comparatively to what I’m saying,

Does not exist.

Besides when the other person provided you with a link to a study. You couldn’t even be critical of it and dismissed it as essentially “well anyone can search and find a contra point to any hot topic”

Like you’re adding nothing of substance here

I said it was wrong on it’s factual points,
Why do you want a point by point break down of an essay you didn’t read / are not going to read?

Posting one essay is not evidence if the rate within relevant academic or critical circles is 1<99.

You can’t prove it doesn’t exist and from my perspective because I’ve done work with this actual research and academic peers in this area — it does.

You’re saying something doesn’t exist without even searching for it.

You’re a charlatan

You disproved nothing here

No, you are literally trying to mislead others on the basis you know something you don’t
Or that something exists when it doesn’t

And I’m proving you can’t even construct a singular argument or statement that proves what I’m saying is wrong, without looking wrong within that comparison.

It’s sad,
And you are the one conning these posters.

And by comparison you have proved and said nothing to reflect,

More than try to seem like you have an air of authority.

It would only look Intelligent to people posting here who already agree with you.

So have fun in that echo chamber of your own thoughts.

I’m telling to enlighten yourself by looking into the work of individuals who have the academic training and their own findings from empirical evidence which debunk many statements Sowell has made over the years (many based on research which wasn’t even his own mind you)

If you don’t wish to do that, you basically saying I’m to be ignorant.

The irony

But you are asking to look for something
I know doesn’t exist to the point you are claiming
And you have no academic validity to prove it within writing,

which deconstructs your authority on the subject.

You type like any other of these fake social activists; asking people to enlighten themselves to a struggle that doesn’t exist
The way you have framed it.

I’m telling you it exists, if you didn’t exist it would be easy to disprove and you being the debater you are would happily do so.

Instead you deflect and hide behind a baseless statement that “it doesn’t exist” without proving it

At this point It’s pretty easy to see you’re being disingenuous here

Everytime I read your posts 😂

What you’re saying is literally an impossible statement

“I’m telling you it’s there, and you don’t want to see it”
But it’s not there
“I’m telling you it’s there, and you don’t want to see it”

I can (can’t) prove it doesn’t exist, if it doesn’t exist that’s inane.

But you can clearly see the overwhelming social cross racial support for his ideas across decades / generations of people.

It formally doesn’t exist, and no amount of saying it does changes that lol.

I’m not offended lol, I could care less about anyone on this site. I’m rich lol at 22 s*** don’t matter to me. Us blacks will always be hated and nobodies because of niggas like y’all. Y’all love to victimize yourselves and claim x, y, z is racist, but y’all are literally racists. You’re a clown, you, @Poignant, and @localblaccmane

That is the most simple definition,

At that point you want me to say

“People find any reason to not understand economics, psychology, and the effects of limited resource / intense competition in the environment”

You having a mechanical compression issue, could be part of the problem.

If you’re saying that no work exist that presents a peer reviewed and accepted contradicting conclusions to many of Sowells statements he’s made over the years.

You’re are one/many/all of these things

1) Ignorant of economic research

2) A troll

3) Don’t even care about what the actual answer is and are simply exercising your debate tactics in this thread

For example since you’re well read on Sowell You can probably have a summary of his ideas on tax rates which then you can simply research in the scholarly database and see what other economist think of his prior research you can even see references of his research we’re academics will either agree with him or say the conclusion contradicts what he found

You say what I’m proposing is impossible but it’s actually very easy and even many young people constantly do it all the time for simple research seminar classes

But now you’re just insulting me, while still claiming the same position.

At that point your argument is void, because you still haven’t refuted what I said

If the support is 1<99 Sowell vs criticism, and his work comprised 60 years of material;
Then you are going to have occasional papers that argue him

Not give inherent validity to your argument.

"It DoEsNt eXiSt"

You posted a Wikipedia article, that has to voice all opinions which is true of all historical, economic, and anthropology pages as that is the basis for scientific discussion

That doesn’t prove anything, or the validly behind those criticism or the authority or those who believe it.

And it is still is in line with my argument, that overwhelming support cross racially is for Thomas Sowell.

Your entire stance here can be summarized as it doesn’t exist

At the same time you say it’s impossible to prove it doesn’t exist

Even as a debater following all the rules right now you’re coming off as a bitter idiot this is not an argument anymore

No that’s not my stance, my stance is that it doesn’t exist in comparison
To overwhelming and obvious agreement In criticality from most people in positions of economic and anthropological authority.