@HeyFella what you think of my list friendo

two of the most flawless soul jams oat

@AllisonXO u know me very well brudda

Tons of fire on there.

why on earth did they give the 'oo the cover for 1968 @RVI they barely did anything

except this classic

feel like yall been on the same year forever

moved on to 1968 yesterday

maybe theyre stans of the magic bus compilation

or saw some live performances that year and deemed them the best live band on the planet or something

Not worthy compared to so many other bands that peaked that year. Should've gave them '71.

LMAO

How often do you change? is it weekly or monthly or sumn?

i mean maybe they didnt want a repeat of bands that got it for another previous year but yeah shouldve been the experience or beatles

I had a pretty f***ed up year so only managed to progress from '66 to '68 in the last 12 months should be able to crack off this year a bit faster

ah lmao thats probably why it felt like that to me

hope it gets better tho

Or the Band or The Kinks or The Velvets or Elvis.

Gf got me all the 60s editions for my birthday a while ago and the covers are;

65 - Beatles which is fine

66 - Dylan which is fine

67 - Hendrix also fine

68 - The Who

69 - Stones appropriate

70 - Sabbath appropriate

Thanks famo getting there

Miles Davis and the mothers of invention approaching jazz fusion from the opposite ends of the spectrum in 1968

when were those made?

I got '66 nearly a decade ago and she got me the rest recently. Not sure when they first came out.

do you think I'm off base for thinking late 60s Elvis isn't rock enough to be declared the "king of rock" again?

even if i thought he was as good as the other goats were at that time it doesnt feel right

There's big articles on Louise Armstrong, Hugh Madakela, Otis, Aretha etc so it's not rock exclusive (except I guess the covers) but yes I'd still say you're off base

couple minutes into that zappa