OP·1 reply
Valentinedidn’t watch but he’s basically saying Jay-Z is part of the Stake lawsuits and it’s unfair to Drake as they are an independent company. basically defending Drake promoting gambling by presenting it as a larger Roc Nation conspiracy
bad summary
- OP
MaxRunI get defending Drake, but defending Stake?
doesnt "defend stake" he just says that its in jay/roc nation/fanatics best interest to take down stake because its a rival to their own betting apps/casinos
- ·1 replyRory
bad summary
he’s literally arguing for unregulated gambling and independent entertainment entities (Drake/Stake/Gamma/Akademiks) vs regulated gambling and the music industry (Jay-Z/Fanatics/UMG/Roc Nation)
can you tell me what I said wrong?
DinoNiggas watching 40 min whats the dirt schizo videos in 2026
- OP·1 replyValentine
he’s literally arguing for unregulated gambling and independent entertainment entities (Drake/Stake/Gamma/Akademiks) vs regulated gambling and the music industry (Jay-Z/Fanatics/UMG/Roc Nation)
can you tell me what I said wrong?
he doesnt "defend drake promoting gambling", he calls stake's crypto business a "loophole" and makes no judgement over whether it is a good or bad thing. and not mentioning jay's own ties to gambling as a personal reason for him to allegedly be involved with anti-stake lawsuits is missing an important piece of the puzzle.
bad summary =/= wrong necessarily
- ·1 replyRory
he doesnt "defend drake promoting gambling", he calls stake's crypto business a "loophole" and makes no judgement over whether it is a good or bad thing. and not mentioning jay's own ties to gambling as a personal reason for him to allegedly be involved with anti-stake lawsuits is missing an important piece of the puzzle.
bad summary =/= wrong necessarily
I didn’t watch the video and am uninterested in this conversation. I copied the transcript summary. Goodnight
- OPValentine
I didn’t watch the video and am uninterested in this conversation. I copied the transcript summary. Goodnight
yeah
