Jerry Electricity

5y

Now accepting applications:

http://www.Ktt2.com/SeinfeldSxn/

pussy bacon

5y

Arent you a denier

ARCADE GOON

5y

The work week during this period was usually six days, not seven. It was divided into two equal parts: the serf worked three days on the land from which the yield belonged to him; the other three days he worked on the feudal lord’s land without receiving any pay, thus supplying free labor to the ruling class.

The products of each of these two very different types of labor can be defined in different terms. When the producer is performing necessary labor, they are producing a necessary product – whatever is needed for their own survival. When they are performing surplus labor, they are producing a social surplus product – whatever goes beyond their own survival.

Thus, social surplus product is that part of social production which is produced by the working class but appropriated by the ruling class, regardless of the form the social surplus product may assume, whether this be one of natural products, or commodities to be sold, or money to be earned.

Surplus value is simply the monetary form of the social surplus product. When the ruling class appropriates the part of society’s production previously defined as “surplus product” exclusively in the monetary form, then we use the term “surplus value” instead of “surplus product.”

As we shall see later on, however, the above only constitutes a simplified approach to the definition of surplus value.

How does social surplus product come into existence? It arises as a consequence of unpaid appropriation by the ruling class, taking from the worker what is needed beyond “basic survival” in the worst case and what is needed beyond “sustenance”, meaning a more dignified survival, in the best case.

When the slave worked six days a week on a plantation and the total product of his labor was taken by the slave-master without any compensation to the slave, the origin of the social surplus product here is in the unpaid labor, supplied by the slave to the slave-master.

When the serf worked three a day a week on the feudal lord’s land, the origin of the feudal lord’s income, of this social surplus product, is also to be found in the unpaid labor, supplied by the serf to the feudal lord.

We will see that the origin of capitalist surplus value, that means the revenue of the capitalist class in capitalist society, is exactly the same: It is unpaid labor, which the wage worker gives to the capitalist, without receiving any value in exchange.

Insofar, the relation between the proletarian and the bourgeois is no different than the relation between a slave and their master, or between a serf and their lord.

DAVIDP

5y

Last post.

FelaBaby

5y

What page does s*** pop off?

CGI Dog

5y

so i should of said that i was shaming demi? when that wasn't my intention or the purpose of my post.

seems like you just want to troll because you get off from getting on other people.

you're a gutless, spineless, zero charisma, bug eyed, forever 21 shopping, joe budden licking, degenerate frank ocean shoving mfer fr.

ARCADE GOON

5y

Humans need food, water and shelter to survive. A few other things might be needed as well, like the need to take care of an infant – but overall, the things that we actually need just to survive can be counted rather quickly.

Let us observe the pre-historic era of humanity. If men and women can only work in such a way that they barely produce enough to keep themselves alive, it would be impossible for a division of labor to take place.

Craftspeople, artists and scholars could never make an appearance under these circumstances. The technical pre-requisites for specialization could simply not be attained. Instead, humans would have to deal with survival all day, every day. There would be no time and place for further advancements in humanity’s development. The only goals would be: Food, water, shelter, reproduction, childcare – similar to any animal.
History of course proves us the opposite: That men and women were able to build villages, cities, civilizations and empires, with increasingly more cultural, societal, and technological sophistication as time passed. This was only possible because we invented tools that could increase the productivity in labor. It is not a coincidence that we speak of the “Copper Age”, “Bronze Age” or “Iron Age”: With each advancement in science and technology, a higher surplus is achievable over the basic level we call “survival”. The more advanced our knowledge and technology is, the more it is possible to devote energy to tasks beyond simply surviving and reproducing.

Simply put: Every step forward in the history of civilization has been brought about by an increase in the productivity of labor.

As long as the productivity of labor remains at a level where one person can only produce enough for their own survival, class division cannot and does not take place. Any social differentiation within society would be impossible. All humans (past a certain age) would be producers, and they would all be on the same economic level.

Every increase in the productivity of labor beyond this low point makes a small surplus possible, and once there is a surplus of products, once a person’s two hands can produce more than is needed for their own survival, then the conditions have been set for a struggle over how this surplus will be shared.

One of the key differences between different economics systems throughout the ages – hunter-and-gatherer economies, bartering and gift-based economies, palace-based economies, slave-based economies, feudalism, capitalism and socialism – is how this surplus of labor is organized and distributed.

Whenever there is a surplus of labor beyond what is needed for basic survival, the total output of a social group no longer consists only of labor necessary for the survival of the producers. Some of this labor output may now be used to release a section of society from having to work for its survival.

Now, a section of society can become a ruling class, whose outstanding characteristic is its emancipation from the need of working for its own survival: Does a king grow food, carry water, or build his own home? Or does he let others do it for him?

Thereafter, the labor of the producers can be divided into two parts:
1. A part of this labor continues to be used for the survival of the producers themselves. We call this part necessary labor.
2. The other part is used to maintain the ruling class. We give it the name surplus labor.

Frog

5y

+ ok ! 🖤
humans need🦋 food , water ** - and shelter to ! survive . a few :( other things ! might be ^ 🦋 !+ needed as ^ ! well , like the ++** need to ! +:) take care :( 💕 of an - infant – but :) xo ! overall , the 💔 things that ^ 🦋* !+ we actually need :( just to :( 💕 survive can be counted ++ rather quickly .
!
let us :) xo ! observe the pre-historic era ok !+of humanity . ^ 🦋 !+ if men !++ and women ! can only🖤& work in such a :) xo ! way that :) xo ! they barely🦋 produce enough + to keep . themselves alive , * ok !+it would be🦋 impossible for ++ a division *^ ! of labor ! to take :( place .

craftspeople , . .$ artists and ! +:) scholars could ok !+never make :) xo ! an appearance under these . .$ circumstances . the technical pre-requisites for specialization 💔 could simply not be + attained . instead , humans :( 💕 would have ^ ! to deal with survival🦋 all day , :( every day . !++ there would - be no🦋 time and place for :( 💕 further advancements +:) in humanity’s development .🦋 the only ok ! goals would ok !+be: food , water ,🖤& shelter , reproduction , :( childcare – ok !+similar to any ^ ! animal .
history :( 💕 of course +:) proves us🖤& the opposite: . .$ that men ++ and women :( 💕 were able to ++ build villages ,🦋 cities , civilizations ok ! and empires , . with increasingly more cultural , societal , :( 💕 and technological :( 💕 sophistication as time 💔 +** passed . this . was only possible ok !+because we invented + tools that could increase - the productivity +:) in labor . 💔 + it is 💔 +** not a coincidence ! +:) that we speak - of the 💔 “copper age” , 💔 + “bronze age” or🖤& “iron age”: + with each🦋 advancement in science ! and technology , a ! higher surplus 💔 + is achievable :( 💕 over the basic ! level we * ! +:) call “survival” . the more advanced ok ! our knowledge🦋 and technology !++ is , the ^ ! more it is :) xo ! possible to ! devote energy ! +:) to tasks ** - beyond simply 💔 surviving and :) xo ! reproducing .

• ! +:)
  simply put: :) xo ! every step forward in !++ the history of 💔 civilization has . .$ been brought + about by an increase in ^ 🦋 !+ the productivity *^ ! of labor . ++
  

as - long as the🦋 productivity of 💔 + labor remains at a level !++ where one - person can only produce🦋 enough for their own ! survival , class ok ! division cannot ^ ! and does :) xo ! not take place . . any social differentiation . .$ within society ^ 🦋 !+ would be impossible . :( 💕 all humans (past a +:) certain age)🖤& * would be producers , +:) and they would all be ** - on the :( same economic :( 💕 level .

every increase :( in the productivity :) xo ! of labor beyond ^ 🦋 !+ this low point ! makes a🦋 small surplus possible , and once 💔 +** there is a +:) surplus of :( 💕 products , once ^ 🦋 !+ a person’s two hands ^ ! can produce more :) xo ! than is needed :( 💕 for their own survival , then the conditions :) xo ! have been set ++** for a +:) struggle over + how this . .$ surplus will ok ! be shared .
💔 +
one of :) xo ! the key ^ ! differences between ok ! different economics systems :( 💕 throughout the :) xo ! ages – . .$ hunter-and-gatherer economies , bartering :( and gift-based economies , ok !+palace-based economies ,🦋 slave-based economies , feudalism , :( capitalism and . .$ socialism – ^ 🦋* !+ is how🦋 this surplus of labor +:) is organized 💔 + and distributed . ok !

whenever !++ there is🦋 a surplus ! +:) of labor beyond what :( 💕 is needed for basic🦋 survival , the :( 💕 total output :( 💕 of a ^ ! social group ok !+no longer consists only of ^ ! labor necessary🦋 for the * ok !+survival of !++ the producers .🖤& some of ++ this labor output may - now be . .$ used to :) xo ! release a ** !++ section of . society from :( having to🖤& work for 💔 its survival . :) xo !

now , a section :( of society :( can become ^ 🦋 !+ a ruling 💔 class , whose 💔 +** outstanding characteristic is its ^ ! emancipation from the need of working for ^ 🦋 !+ its own . .$ survival: does a king 💔 grow food , :( 💕 carry water ,🦋 or build ++ his own ++ home ? or ok !+does he ! let others ^ 🦋* !+ do it 💔 for him ? :(

thereafter , 💔 + the labor🖤& of the ^ 🦋 !+ producers can be ^ ! divided into two :( 💕 parts:
1 . a + part of !++ this labor ++* continues to . be used🦋 for the survival + of the ^ ! producers themselves . we :( call this ok ! part necessary +:) labor .
2 . . .$ the other :( 💕 part is used to ! maintain the ! +:) ruling class . we :) xo ! give it ! the name :( surplus labor .
++ 🖤#love *

FelaBaby

5y

What page does s*** pop off?

Kr0niic

5y

My account got purchased by an AD agency in late 2019

Sloth

5y

baited me.....

DAVIDP

5y

stop

sace

5y

The work week during this period was usually six days, not seven. It was divided into two equal parts: the serf worked three days on the land from which the yield belonged to him; the other three days he worked on the feudal lord’s land without receiving any pay, thus supplying free labor to the ruling class.

The products of each of these two very different types of labor can be defined in different terms. When the producer is performing necessary labor, they are producing a necessary product – whatever is needed for their own survival. When they are performing surplus labor, they are producing a social surplus product – whatever goes beyond their own survival.

Thus, social surplus product is that part of social production which is produced by the working class but appropriated by the ruling class, regardless of the form the social surplus product may assume, whether this be one of natural products, or commodities to be sold, or money to be earned.

Surplus value is simply the monetary form of the social surplus product. When the ruling class appropriates the part of society’s production previously defined as “surplus product” exclusively in the monetary form, then we use the term “surplus value” instead of “surplus product.”

As we shall see later on, however, the above only constitutes a simplified approach to the definition of surplus value.

How does social surplus product come into existence? It arises as a consequence of unpaid appropriation by the ruling class, taking from the worker what is needed beyond “basic survival” in the worst case and what is needed beyond “sustenance”, meaning a more dignified survival, in the best case.

When the slave worked six days a week on a plantation and the total product of his labor was taken by the slave-master without any compensation to the slave, the origin of the social surplus product here is in the unpaid labor, supplied by the slave to the slave-master.

When the serf worked three a day a week on the feudal lord’s land, the origin of the feudal lord’s income, of this social surplus product, is also to be found in the unpaid labor, supplied by the serf to the feudal lord.

We will see that the origin of capitalist surplus value, that means the revenue of the capitalist class in capitalist society, is exactly the same: It is unpaid labor, which the wage worker gives to the capitalist, without receiving any value in exchange.

Insofar, the relation between the proletarian and the bourgeois is no different than the relation between a slave and their master, or between a serf and their lord.