Sep 24, 2022·1 reply
JodyDo you think these groups would eventually war with each others over their resources? Kinda leading to nation state
I think conflict could erupt yeah but that’s that consensus based decision making is for, everyone wouldnt be looking out for their own interests you would always have the needs and concerns of your brother in mind
- Sep 24, 2022·1 replyBoxcarscar
I think conflict could erupt yeah but that’s that consensus based decision making is for, everyone wouldnt be looking out for their own interests you would always have the needs and concerns of your brother in mind
Idk man sounds like death and chaos
I get not wanting the state to hold your hand but laws bring order and those laws have to be enforced - Sep 24, 2022·2 repliesJody
Idk man sounds like death and chaos
I get not wanting the state to hold your hand but laws bring order and those laws have to be enforcedIt’s not like laws wouldnt exist, they would just be enforced by the whole of society vs a state.
- Sep 24, 2022·1 replyBoxcarscar
It’s not like laws wouldnt exist, they would just be enforced by the whole of society vs a state.
Let me know if you want to stop talking.
How would that work… logistically?
Sep 24, 2022BoxcarscarBut it’s so true, you don’t think the religious repression and attempted genocide of the Uyghurs isnt some fascist ass s***?
I’m a Maoist so I don’t consider China communist
- Sep 24, 2022Boxcarscar
But they had their political freedoms revoked, thats f***ed up. They can live as regular citizens but youve just taken a man and revoked his freedom, his liberty. No matter how great his sins in the past politically thats f***ed up.
It is 100% a good thing to revoke certain classes’ political freedoms
- Sep 24, 2022Womanpuncher69
let some b****es take over ur d*** and you’ll see how u change ur mind
How old are you
- Sep 24, 2022·4 repliesJody
Let me know if you want to stop talking.
How would that work… logistically?
This is my ideal world right.
Theres a law against rape, you rape someone, people get you together and bring you befotr a counsel of the victim and her peers and s*** and they talk about the impact that had them and why your act was bad. Then youre brought to classes meant to stem your behavior and if you reoffend or choose not to take these classes youre forcibly exiled by the community
- Sep 24, 2022Boxcarscar
This is my ideal world right.
Theres a law against rape, you rape someone, people get you together and bring you befotr a counsel of the victim and her peers and s*** and they talk about the impact that had them and why your act was bad. Then youre brought to classes meant to stem your behavior and if you reoffend or choose not to take these classes youre forcibly exiled by the community
Okay, I like that idea
- Sep 24, 2022
…158 replies? Y’all that bored
Sep 24, 2022Have these gentlemen ever seen a revolution? A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon — authoritarian means, if such there be at all; and if the victorious party does not want to have fought in vain, it must maintain this rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionists. Would the Paris Commune have lasted a single day if it had not made use of this authority of the armed people against the bourgeois? Should we not, on the contrary, reproach it for not having used it freely enough?
Therefore, either one of two things: either the anti-authoritarians don't know what they're talking about, in which case they are creating nothing but confusion; or they do know, and in that case they are betraying the movement of the proletariat. In either case they serve the reaction.
- Sep 24, 2022
Donahuekirb- walks into an anarchist meeting
- tells them to read On Authority
- leaves
- Sep 24, 2022Boxcarscar
Under anarchism if a fascist totalitarian movement is boiling I would hope that the people would get together to stop it. By whatever means, debate at first, violence if necessary.
Debate
- Sep 24, 2022Womanpuncher69
the thread at this point
- Sep 24, 2022Boxcarscar
Under anarchism if a fascist totalitarian movement is boiling I would hope that the people would get together to stop it. By whatever means, debate at first, violence if necessary.
- Sep 24, 2022
Virgin debate the fascist vs chad why would i debate apartheid with a zionist
- Sep 24, 2022Boxcarscar
But we don’t want a polity, we want that decentralization, it’s our greatest strength
DECENTRALIZED GOOD
Sep 24, 2022While the ideals of anarchism sound nice, the theory will just never work in reality. There will always be an underlying authority. Yes, even in a fantastical hypothetical where we live in a democratic confederation of villages and towns that is managed entirely by communities, there is a burgeoning want of power, even subconsciously. When we take into fact that there are capitalist nations and empires surrounding us as well-- an anarchist society is really just a power vacuum ready to be swooped up by another power.
It's just not feasible in my opinion.
- Sep 24, 2022
thread did 7 pages in less than half a day
Sep 24, 2022BoxcarscarUnder anarchism if a fascist totalitarian movement is boiling I would hope that the people would get together to stop it. By whatever means, debate at first, violence if necessary.
Debating is an alt right recruitment tactic, chud
- Sep 24, 2022Boxcarscar
It just makes sense, right? The ultimate form of liberty without coercion by unfair heiarchy. Being truly free, living with no masters. Isn’t it a beautiful idea? Sure capitalism has proved efficient with regards to producing wealth, but aren’t these power structures imbalanced and evil? Can’t we just admit that states, in general, undermine the freedom of the self? Can you Marxist-Leninists admit that socialism in one country never works and we have to push for a worldwide revolution?
To all you so called communists, why do you think your vanguard party is exempt from tyranny of the minority and the slow poisoning of corruption? Thomas Sankars may have been a good leader, but at the end of the day he was just a good guy with a state, and any form of authoritarianism or stateism always leads to tyranny.
you are too comfortable to be an anarchist
Sep 24, 2022·1 replyit could work in a small population
- Sep 24, 2022Boxcarscar
This is my ideal world right.
Theres a law against rape, you rape someone, people get you together and bring you befotr a counsel of the victim and her peers and s*** and they talk about the impact that had them and why your act was bad. Then youre brought to classes meant to stem your behavior and if you reoffend or choose not to take these classes youre forcibly exiled by the community
not a class to stop you from raping
- Sep 24, 2022Sonic Winter
it could work in a small population
Until they get invaded by a larger more organized population
