S*** was more believable before it was all over the mainstream news shows and in front of congress. that 60 minutes episode should've set off all the alarms
lol
"They've killed people to keep this secret!" - guy given a live national television audience
It’s so simple.
It’s a cover up of America’s weapons program. Trillions of dollars have been devoted to this stuff and the result is unexplainable aerial activity that needs some sort of cover.
And it’s not the main part, but all news is basically about how our institutions are crumbling, our economy is teetering, our ecology is teetering, none of the institutions are capable of dealing with it - hey, what if there’s an alien! They could have earth-saving new tech!
Psychologically it’s of the same lofty fantasy as going to Mars or any other escape from the trap we’ve found ourselves in.
so ur saying they accidentally broke the laws of physics and spawned a bunch of ufos..
and this is believable to u?
(i) Instantaneous acceleration absent apparent inertia: Newton's first law (the law of inertia) states that an object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force. Instantaneous acceleration would imply an incredibly high force. Such high acceleration without inertia is challenging to explain with our current understanding of physics, as it would require an immense energy source and potentially result in destructive forces for the object or beings inside. It also raises questions about how such forces could be transmitted without a reaction (third law).
This is the crux of the matter, I think this is what all this is about, enormous energy without enormous effects. Could be nuclear
(ii) Hypersonic velocity absent a thermal signature and sonic shockwave: High-speed travel through a medium like air usually results in a shockwave (sonic boom) and generates heat due to air friction. An object moving at hypersonic velocities without these effects seems to defy our understanding of fluid dynamics and thermodynamics.
Not a law of physics
(iii) Transmedium travel: UFOs have been reported to move seamlessly between different mediums like air, water, and potentially space. Our current technology requires different vehicles for each medium because of the different forces and principles at play, such as buoyancy in water versus lift in the air.
Not a law of physics
(iv) Positive lift contrary to known aerodynamic principles: Traditional flight requires a balance of forces, with lift overcoming weight. Objects that seem to hover or maneuver without visible means of propulsion or lift surfaces (like wings) defy our current understanding of aerodynamics.
Not a law of physics
(v) Multispectral signature control: This could refer to the ability to control the electromagnetic radiation an object emits or reflects across various wavelengths (visible light, infrared, radio waves, etc.). This could involve advanced stealth technologies or concepts beyond our current knowledge.
Not a law of physics
(vi) Physical or invasive biological effects to close observers and the environment: There have been reports of UFO encounters causing physical or biological effects, such as radiation sickness or interference with electrical equipment. These effects are not well understood and are often disputed.
Not a law of physics
Thanks brother you have proven a lot today
"They've killed people to keep this secret!" - guy given a live national television audience
What do the two have to do with each other lol
(i) Instantaneous acceleration absent apparent inertia: Newton's first law (the law of inertia) states that an object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force. Instantaneous acceleration would imply an incredibly high force. Such high acceleration without inertia is challenging to explain with our current understanding of physics, as it would require an immense energy source and potentially result in destructive forces for the object or beings inside. It also raises questions about how such forces could be transmitted without a reaction (third law).
This is the crux of the matter, I think this is what all this is about, enormous energy without enormous effects. Could be nuclear
(ii) Hypersonic velocity absent a thermal signature and sonic shockwave: High-speed travel through a medium like air usually results in a shockwave (sonic boom) and generates heat due to air friction. An object moving at hypersonic velocities without these effects seems to defy our understanding of fluid dynamics and thermodynamics.
Not a law of physics
(iii) Transmedium travel: UFOs have been reported to move seamlessly between different mediums like air, water, and potentially space. Our current technology requires different vehicles for each medium because of the different forces and principles at play, such as buoyancy in water versus lift in the air.
Not a law of physics
(iv) Positive lift contrary to known aerodynamic principles: Traditional flight requires a balance of forces, with lift overcoming weight. Objects that seem to hover or maneuver without visible means of propulsion or lift surfaces (like wings) defy our current understanding of aerodynamics.
Not a law of physics
(v) Multispectral signature control: This could refer to the ability to control the electromagnetic radiation an object emits or reflects across various wavelengths (visible light, infrared, radio waves, etc.). This could involve advanced stealth technologies or concepts beyond our current knowledge.
Not a law of physics
(vi) Physical or invasive biological effects to close observers and the environment: There have been reports of UFO encounters causing physical or biological effects, such as radiation sickness or interference with electrical equipment. These effects are not well understood and are often disputed.
Not a law of physics
this is some next level pedantic s*** lol
and u even agree w the general point dude is making but u still wrote all this to call him out on a technicality ðŸ˜
@Yuzzy still hasn't responded to the fact UFOs have been seen since the late 1800s. Apparently he thinks we've just been chilling with unexplainably high tech vehicles since then and we had them on stand by during world war 1 and 2. How do you respond Yuzzy. I want to hear your genius explanation
this is some next level pedantic s*** lol
and u even agree w the general point dude is making but u still wrote all this to call him out on a technicality ðŸ˜
GPT 4 wrote most of it
Omg can we get this Lou guy out of here. This mf must work for the government the way he keeps pushing this "it's all military vehicles" nonsense
peep this

What do the two have to do with each other lol
i don't think lou has considered that govt policy can change
this is some next level pedantic s*** lol
and u even agree w the general point dude is making but u still wrote all this to call him out on a technicality ðŸ˜
"Yes they are exhibiting characteristics maybe 50-100 years past what EVERYONE currently has
BUT THOSE OTHER 4 ARE NOT LAWS OF PHYSICS
haha gotcha"
but all news is basically about how our institutions are crumbling, our economy is teetering, our ecology is teetering, none of the institutions are capable of dealing with it - hey, what if there’s an alien! They could have earth-saving new tech!
Nobody today ever said anything about aliens are going to save earth man
This is all being framed in a national security perspective
Lol. Great framing to get those appropriations. Total success
Everything is politics
Yes the problem with society is that we’re convinced everything is political
@Yuzzy still hasn't responded to the fact UFOs have been seen since the late 1800s. Apparently he thinks we've just been chilling with unexplainably high tech vehicles since then and we had them on stand by during world war 1 and 2. How do you respond Yuzzy. I want to hear your genius explanation
I don't have an explanation that and earlier sightings such as in antiquity, 1500s 1600s 1700s are the best evidence for extraterrestrial origin
Lol. Great framing to get those appropriations. Total success
Are you saying congress is doing all this to give more money to defense contractors?????
Why is this grusch guy leaving out a lot of the details?
Like why does he say he can’t say it public
What do the two have to do with each other lol
I feel like if you are going to buy in to the proposition that U.S. government has a strong vested interest in keeping this secret to the point that they have killed ppl, silenced ppl, etc. you would have to be skeptical of the fact that the seemingly decided to not do those things with this guy and rather let him have a national audience. What makes him different from the others that were allegedly silenced.
Why is this grusch guy leaving out a lot of the details?
Like why does he say he can’t say it public
Whistleblower laws
He cant say anything that is classified or he will go straight to jail
"Yes they are exhibiting characteristics maybe 50-100 years past what EVERYONE currently has
BUT THOSE OTHER 4 ARE NOT LAWS OF PHYSICS
haha gotcha"
50-100 years ahead of public sector is reasonable for the most advanced private group in the world
@Yuzzy still hasn't responded to the fact UFOs have been seen since the late 1800s. Apparently he thinks we've just been chilling with unexplainably high tech vehicles since then and we had them on stand by during world war 1 and 2. How do you respond Yuzzy. I want to hear your genius explanation
uh, prove it?
Some dude writing in his journal 200 years ago that he saw some lights in the sky is not very convincing to any serious person. Be serious
Whistleblower laws
He cant say anything that is classified or he will go straight to jail
Ah ok thanks
Will this stuff ever come out publicly then?
Yes the problem with society is that we’re convinced everything is political
Society has much bigger problems