Reply
  • Jul 4, 2020

    Lots of temporarily embarassed millionaires ITT

  • Jul 4, 2020

    Thread title way harder than the actual post

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    CRACKASTEPPAVEGAN

    What is the evidence of us not needing it anymore

    Capitalism relies on the supposition that the resources to maintain it are infinite when we in fact live in a world with finite resources

    The battle for who gets these resources as you all know is exemplified by the wars in the middle east and the US toppling regimes across the world to install pro US trade regimes

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    fun guy

    how will pseudo sanctimony negatively effect America on the scale that racially motivated alt right folks have? like, what policies could evoke from woke twitter users that would be equivalent to defunding health care + public education, lowering taxes for the rich, making toddlers defend themselves in court, neutering trans rights, suppressing voters, etc.

    don't get me wrong twitter is definitely a cesspool but equating these so called "radicals" to racist maga c***s sounds like you're just preaching some centrist bullshit tbh.

    idk how closely you follow what’s going on out there but there are “radicals” on twitter advocating for the complete abolition of police and prisons to the point that they say literally not one person should ever be arrested or jailed because if we cultivate our communities better there will be zero crime (mental). There are people like noname advocating going back to a BARTER economy and commune style communism - do you understand what a disaster this would be for 100% of America

    Defunding health care and education are directly opposed to what I stand for but my whole point is that it feels rn that the public and the elite and corporations and politicians in charge are more scared of and wanting to appease the extreme left to “virtue signal” (sorry to use that term)

    I do hear what you’re saying though maybe I am misspeaking a little bit

  • Jul 4, 2020
    Peezy

    Yeah I definitely agree that greed and selfishness from people are the biggest block to becoming a utopian society. The question then is how do we bring up future generations with more empathy/love to build a utopian society while we live in a capitalist one? Because we obviously can’t skip ahead to the utopia part when people are still controlled by their greed

    I think it involves raising future generations to value themselves with all their strengths n weaknesses. prioritizing the development of their passions and skillset over getting in to a "good career/program to study". Then they'll learn how to monetize their skills and support themselves. Also, better education for low income people. idk if thats the cure but I think its a start

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    SomeRandomNob

    I respect your demand for change, and I hope you'll join me one day when waterworld passes by your area. Sorry for being so condescending, you're right that no one person will single handedly change the world.

    I guess I'll be a hypocrite and rant about my plan. I've figured out how to 3D print land, you can print an acre for less than a grand, just printing vertical interlocking pontoons. Waterworld will be built on these in international waters, it will consist of decentralized and self governing floating towns, cities and independent people. Some of them will remain stationary, others will travel the world. Some will be libertarian capitalist societies, others will be communistic, and it will be up to the individual to choose what system works best for them, one of the few "laws" of waterworld is the freedom of travel and choice of which political system you work under.

    I'm still working on energy generation, sustainable and cheap food production and the extraction or farming of raw resources we could use for the manufacturing of products and the construction of homes and buoyant platforms, potentially reducing the capital/external cost of printing land to 0 for communistic societies. This means that communist societies could actually function independently without resorting to purchasing certain resources from capitalist adversaries, allowing one to actually try communism both consensually and without having to convert the entire world at once.

    I'm only a year away from printing my first house boat with a workshop onboard, which I will hopefully use to manufacture and sell houseboats and other products, which will then fund the expansion of my city state on Lake Ontario, which will eventually become the seed for all political decentralized waterworld states, be them communist or capitalist.

    It might not work, but this is how you actually change the world instead of just imaging what it could be.

    this a sick plan (kinda crazy lol) my only concern is with a bunch of people living together there's bound to be conflict over "the leader". the person who makes/enforces all the rules. How would that work out?

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    farhamptonfreddie

    idk how closely you follow what’s going on out there but there are “radicals” on twitter advocating for the complete abolition of police and prisons to the point that they say literally not one person should ever be arrested or jailed because if we cultivate our communities better there will be zero crime (mental). There are people like noname advocating going back to a BARTER economy and commune style communism - do you understand what a disaster this would be for 100% of America

    Defunding health care and education are directly opposed to what I stand for but my whole point is that it feels rn that the public and the elite and corporations and politicians in charge are more scared of and wanting to appease the extreme left to “virtue signal” (sorry to use that term)

    I do hear what you’re saying though maybe I am misspeaking a little bit

    those views represent a SUBSTANTIALLY small portion of the country (0.1% or lower). why would America go to such extremes like completely abolishing the police/prisons in order to appease such a tiny minority? as for corporations "virtue signalling" the left in moderate ways like Nascar banning the Confederate flag, Nike banning redskin merch, PayPal donating to black businesses, etc. I see nothing wrong with that and think it's a good thing in order to move society forward, far better than the alternative if companies started appeasing the far right.

    this is a common argument conservatives use to fear monger: "the LEFT wants to ABOLISH all private property" and then they use anecdotal outliers from a random Twitter zoomer to drive home their point.

    Twitter users are not representative of the real world.

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    2 replies
    Moody mann

    Capitalism relies on the supposition that the resources to maintain it are infinite when we in fact live in a world with finite resources

    The battle for who gets these resources as you all know is exemplified by the wars in the middle east and the US toppling regimes across the world to install pro US trade regimes

    Capitalism relies on the supposition that the resources to maintain it are infinite when we in fact live in a world with finite resources

    Only in the world we currently live in. What about the other worlds we don't know yet? What about what's "out there"? I'm talking about space exploration and discovering other habitable planets.

    Now I understand these things take time. But they also take ambition, risk. The elements that are pushed by the capitalistic ideals that we hold on to. Not all of these ideals work, as I stated earlier.

    As much as we can dog on capitalism, it pushes us to innovate and extend beyond our limits. Who knows what we would know in 25 years time? Knowledge is infinite; the more we'll know then, the more resources we can gather.

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    Flyghost

    this a sick plan (kinda crazy lol) my only concern is with a bunch of people living together there's bound to be conflict over "the leader". the person who makes/enforces all the rules. How would that work out?

    Thought long and hard about it, there will be no leaders.

    We currently vote for who we want to control us, it's an illusion of democracy. I say we simply build a true democracy by allowing citizens to vote directly on all issues. The citizens will be their own leaders.

    Hopefully both libertarians and communists and everyone in between will fight together to defend each other against malicious individuals attempting to gain control of democratic communities.

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    CRACKASTEPPAVEGAN

    Capitalism relies on the supposition that the resources to maintain it are infinite when we in fact live in a world with finite resources

    Only in the world we currently live in. What about the other worlds we don't know yet? What about what's "out there"? I'm talking about space exploration and discovering other habitable planets.

    Now I understand these things take time. But they also take ambition, risk. The elements that are pushed by the capitalistic ideals that we hold on to. Not all of these ideals work, as I stated earlier.

    As much as we can dog on capitalism, it pushes us to innovate and extend beyond our limits. Who knows what we would know in 25 years time? Knowledge is infinite; the more we'll know then, the more resources we can gather.

    Let's spend tax revenue taking care of our own people before we start blowing up asteroids next.

    It really is the whole reason Trump created the space force though, he knows the Earth's running out of resources.

  • fun guy

    those views represent a SUBSTANTIALLY small portion of the country (0.1% or lower). why would America go to such extremes like completely abolishing the police/prisons in order to appease such a tiny minority? as for corporations "virtue signalling" the left in moderate ways like Nascar banning the Confederate flag, Nike banning redskin merch, PayPal donating to black businesses, etc. I see nothing wrong with that and think it's a good thing in order to move society forward, far better than the alternative if companies started appeasing the far right.

    this is a common argument conservatives use to fear monger: "the LEFT wants to ABOLISH all private property" and then they use anecdotal outliers from a random Twitter zoomer to drive home their point.

    Twitter users are not representative of the real world.

    You make valid points and I hope that the people who hold those views ARE a small minority that mainly exists on twitter and I hope that kind of ideology doesn’t spread and take off - maybe I’m more scared of it than I should be

    As for nascar Nike and PayPal and those types of things I absolutely agree those are all positive things for real that’s not the kind of virtue signalling I mean

    Anyway thanks for actually using your brain to discuss unlike op

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Moody mann

    Let's spend tax revenue taking care of our own people before we start blowing up asteroids next.

    It really is the whole reason Trump created the space force though, he knows the Earth's running out of resources.

    It's a double edged sword really. Without a back up plan, we might implode as a species. So yeah I can see where you're coming from. There's a whole lot we need to fix in this lifetime on our planet. If our plans go to s***, well, there's always somewhere else to land. I'm guessing that's the general idea

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    CRACKASTEPPAVEGAN

    Capitalism relies on the supposition that the resources to maintain it are infinite when we in fact live in a world with finite resources

    Only in the world we currently live in. What about the other worlds we don't know yet? What about what's "out there"? I'm talking about space exploration and discovering other habitable planets.

    Now I understand these things take time. But they also take ambition, risk. The elements that are pushed by the capitalistic ideals that we hold on to. Not all of these ideals work, as I stated earlier.

    As much as we can dog on capitalism, it pushes us to innovate and extend beyond our limits. Who knows what we would know in 25 years time? Knowledge is infinite; the more we'll know then, the more resources we can gather.

    Think about the billions of people living in poverty who will never get a proper education. Wouldn't modern science be much better off if we were able to give a proper education and lifestyle to all the people still living like its the Middle Ages? More educated people = much more scientists and innovative thinkers who could help us solve the impending doom our planet faces.

    The idea that Capitalism is the main fuel behind innovation is a myth. Was Capitalism around during the Scientific revolution? Was Nikola Tesla motivated by money? Nah.

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Moody mann

    Human beings have survived thousands of years without any of the technological “advancements”’of the modern era, many of which are directly responsible for killing our planet and other people in an efficient manner.

    Yes people “survived” in the past with a much worse quality of life and a far lower life expectancy. People often forget how terrible the past was when compared the modern era. It’s incredibly ignorant to try to boil down human advancement as “responsible for killing our planet and our people” when the average life expectancy in the 1700s was around 35 years old. Technological progress and free market globalization objectively helped humanity in countless ways

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    CRACKASTEPPAVEGAN

    It's a double edged sword really. Without a back up plan, we might implode as a species. So yeah I can see where you're coming from. There's a whole lot we need to fix in this lifetime on our planet. If our plans go to s***, well, there's always somewhere else to land. I'm guessing that's the general idea

    You really seem optimistic that humans will be able to survive on Mars on something

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    fun guy

    Think about the billions of people living in poverty who will never get a proper education. Wouldn't modern science be much better off if we were able to give a proper education and lifestyle to all the people still living like its the Middle Ages? More educated people = much more scientists and innovative thinkers who could help us solve the impending doom our planet faces.

    The idea that Capitalism is the main fuel behind innovation is a myth. Was Capitalism around during the Scientific revolution? Was Nikola Tesla motivated by money? Nah.

    I think Tesla was motivated by money, but lets for argument sake assume he wasn't. How do you manage to acquire all the tools necessary to conduct such experiments in a non capitalist society? You'd have to have such a surplus of goods that you're willing to give away valuable metals and tools to teenagers and young adults to f*** with, potentially killing them in the process.

    Do you honestly think any communist system would have allowed Tesla conduct his research? Tesla was able to do so much research because he worked his ass off and used the profits of his manual labour to invest in materials that he then sold for a profit, and used said profit to scale up both his businesses and his research.

    I've seen government labs, hell even the Russians did great things with a socialized science industry, they always have a goal in mind and do not fund anything that doesn't meet their goal. It's hard to do it any other way without getting ripped off by a******s pretending to do research.

    The free market is the best mechanism we have to distinguish legitimately useful research and production, without it you're trusting a limited amount of individuals to basically predict the future, and if they fail to, millions will die due to the lack of potential innovations that could made their deaths preventable.

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    SomeRandomNob

    Thought long and hard about it, there will be no leaders.

    We currently vote for who we want to control us, it's an illusion of democracy. I say we simply build a true democracy by allowing citizens to vote directly on all issues. The citizens will be their own leaders.

    Hopefully both libertarians and communists and everyone in between will fight together to defend each other against malicious individuals attempting to gain control of democratic communities.

    I feel like it'll be a slow process if every single member has an issue and every single member is voting on all of them. but I can see or hope for an efficient democratic process being implemented in the future. also u mentioned Lake Ontario so I assume ur a fellow canadian. big ups to for that and good luck fr

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    Huawei5G

    Yes people “survived” in the past with a much worse quality of life and a far lower life expectancy. People often forget how terrible the past was when compared the modern era. It’s incredibly ignorant to try to boil down human advancement as “responsible for killing our planet and our people” when the average life expectancy in the 1700s was around 35 years old. Technological progress and free market globalization objectively helped humanity in countless ways

    Knew this cliched argument was coming.

    Medicinal advances couldn't exist under socialism? Why? Because they have before.

    The profit motive of the health care industry doesn't help create better health products, common decency and federal funding should didctate that. Cuba has the best doctors in the world, it's one of their main exports even.

    And where's the major benefit gained by globalization? Many conservatives don't even believe in "free market" globalism because it outsources labor to the cheapest bidder.

    Most people who were born into this system so they think it's all that can exist because it's all they've ever known.

    American life expectancy has gone DOWN recently, wonder why

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    edited
    fun guy

    Think about the billions of people living in poverty who will never get a proper education. Wouldn't modern science be much better off if we were able to give a proper education and lifestyle to all the people still living like its the Middle Ages? More educated people = much more scientists and innovative thinkers who could help us solve the impending doom our planet faces.

    The idea that Capitalism is the main fuel behind innovation is a myth. Was Capitalism around during the Scientific revolution? Was Nikola Tesla motivated by money? Nah.

    Idk if Tesla was driven by ambition alone, so I'll not answer that part. All I'll say is, in my opinion, capitalism has been one of the main drivers of improvements in our society for the better part of the 20th and 21st century. It's easy to overlook how far we've come now if we look at only the downsides like economic inequality and disparities in wealth and education.

    My suggestion is that we take ideas from other models of socialism that advocate for easier access to education etc minus the state ownership of all property and abolishment of the private sector. But to do away with capitalism completely is something that I do not see feasible, given that people are....well, people...

  • Flyghost

    I feel like it'll be a slow process if every single member has an issue and every single member is voting on all of them. but I can see or hope for an efficient democratic process being implemented in the future. also u mentioned Lake Ontario so I assume ur a fellow canadian. big ups to for that and good luck fr

    Eh, yearly votes, ~100 issues a year, most people will be encouraged to read them all but to vote "no opinion" if they don't care. All in person votes, all less than 200 ppl each all sitting in an auditorium, elected announcer reads the vote, everyone holds up either white or black, everyone brings their own camera and gets to record the room, everyone tallys up the votes at the end of the day and compared numbers, vote results announced 2 days after voting day starts with all camera footaged released publicly and archived for people to verify.

    But yea it'll take some thought and experience to get it right, it really doesn't have to be that hard.

    Also nice to see another Canadian on here, if this actually works you should check the place out once it starts getting going. Should be based somewhere between Stoney Creek and Kingston, probably near Hamilton depending on where I can get away with anchoring, might just move back and forth constantly we'll see.

    Popo don't like sketch s*** near the cities but like 10 mins east of stoney creek is empty so no one gives a f***.

  • Jul 4, 2020
    ·
    edited
    Moody mann

    You really seem optimistic that humans will be able to survive on Mars on something

    Who knows when it might happen. Thing is, it's always good to be optimistic and realistic. Might not be now, probably a couple of hiccups on the way. Maybe my great grandkids will be the ones to see it happen, but hopefully it does happen

  • Jul 4, 2020

    This nigga synop be trying so hard to be the malcom x of ktt and I have no idea why

  • Synopsis

    this post symbolizes what im talking about lol

    The death knells of capitalism, we are in the last inning. Close up the McMansion’s. Let the plants grow over them & crumble them what a utter waste when we could have been building Something to benefit our planet. If you don’t have a family of giants, you can’t live in a McMansion.

    No sympathy for anyone continuing these massive consuming dwelling’s. Bottled water companies can only exist if they are nonprofit. No more profiting off the basic necessities of survival: food water shelter. 😎

1
...
12
13
14
...
18