those countries aren't socialist

They are still capitalist and never had to deal with issues like major wealth gaps, overpopulation, poverty or mass immigration. We have already seen France struggle greatly with their system because of recent impoverished immigration and population increases and that is but a fraction of what we go through daily.

Uh yes. The Soviet Union in 1907

Niggas be like "Oh no the USSR was a fluke next time we got it"

I can kind of guess why you think like that, but that's simply not true actual leftists and falls more in line with Social Liberal types.
Leftist ideas for the most part revolve around collective ownership and equity, so the idea would be to have either worker or community oversight in the day to day running of organisations. So instead of having one powerful individual dictating how an organisation is run, the workers do so collectively, it's basically democratising work spaces so equity can be achieved. It's drastically different from what mainstream media would have you believe.

That's not how life works

life works however we decide you potato

oh wait thats fifty950 nvm i aint doin this again

Idk whats not to get

Most ppl still live through unessary bad s*** everyday

We killing the planet for (?????) luxury??

How about we fix basics first... as humanity as a whole

He a alt?

They were not more nationalist than communist, if that was the case then Fred Hampton wouldn't have made this speech:

They were Marxists, Maoists to be more specific. Huey Newton even visited and praised Maoist China.

no just didnt know he changed his name lol

Op dumb as hell

nah u dont get it bro if you dont have designer jeans on then you cant speak

The stock market doesn't have to be "evil". It currently is because it's a tool for capitalists to further exploitation of workers. The ones who benefit from the workers of a company aren't the laborers themselves -- it's the folk that control them. Common shareholders gain voting rights (varying on their constitutions), but the workers do not. It's the burden of financial capital.

You can move towards a much more "fair" stock market through workers of a company inheriting the stock themselves, like ESOP's. But widespread plans like that will not happen without strict governmental intervention. And the government itself profits from how the stock market currently operates. So, yeah.

Oh my u think they rly abolished money in 1907 dont u

Think you're mistaken, the Soviet Union simply didn't exist in 1907

they keys to financial freedom are right in front of op but instead he rather wine on the Internet talking about “tHaTs eViL”

Yeah just ignore the

Famine: google.com/amp/s/www.history.com/.amp/news/ukrainian-famine-stalin

Human rights violations: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_the_Soviet_Union

Ethnic cleansing:sciencespo.fr/mass-violence-war-massacre-resistance/fr/document/soviet-massive-deportations-chronology.html

i donr even know you cuck

lets keep it that way

the keys to financial freedom are locked behind a paywall, ironically enough