Reply
  • Jun 1
    ·
    1 reply
    Big Dog

    1. Yes you are.

    2. Yes you did.

    3. Why not? Its lapping GNX the biggest album of the decade

    1. You’re a misogynist

    2. Quote a post showing me saying that

    3. It hasn’t lapped GNX in anything besides first week sales

  • Jun 1
    ·
    1 reply
    Big Dog

    This is false btw. The calculations are completely wrong, plus iceman outstreamed GNX week 1 and week 2 in the US. It was being outsold regardless this girl is dumb as hell

    That account is the person who runs Talk of the Charts dumbass

  • Big Dog

    Yes you did 😂😂😂

    Quote a post where I said that then

  • Freight
    https://twitter.com/Prestigeplug7/status/2061181437899092422

    this being the first album to do this is kinda crazy

  • Jun 1
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    shaleirose

    1. You’re a misogynist

    2. Quote a post showing me saying that

    3. It hasn’t lapped GNX in anything besides first week sales

    and second week sales and actually having a global #1 which GNX didn't, because it was a local album

    GNX didn't even get a #2 on the global 100, drake had the whole top 7

  • mangotflu

    https://www.instagram.com/p/DZBiAgHtEOA/
    lmao s***y source but if this is real so many people in here have been so wrong its insane

    1) Taylor not even close to Drake, who has only just released a new album
    2) Morgan AND Bad Bunny about to overttake Taylor
    3) Future > The Weeknd when he hasn't dropped in over 2 years
    4) Cole & Kendrick both on 1.8m - far below Future, even though both dropped way more recent than Future
    5) Travis 1.1m

    All that talk about back catalog being sooo important meanwhile Trav/Kendrick/Cole are fighting for scraps

    even with Bieber's coachella stuff going mad he's so low

    Well that's because Future has a more replayable back catalog than those 3 guys

  • shaleirose

    That account is the person who runs Talk of the Charts dumbass

    TOTC as a whole is accurate and LP is part of their team.

    But these estimates include YouTube for Kendrick "new" rules and don't for Drake "old" rules

  • mangotflu

    https://www.instagram.com/p/DZBiAgHtEOA/
    lmao s***y source but if this is real so many people in here have been so wrong its insane

    1) Taylor not even close to Drake, who has only just released a new album
    2) Morgan AND Bad Bunny about to overttake Taylor
    3) Future > The Weeknd when he hasn't dropped in over 2 years
    4) Cole & Kendrick both on 1.8m - far below Future, even though both dropped way more recent than Future
    5) Travis 1.1m

    All that talk about back catalog being sooo important meanwhile Trav/Kendrick/Cole are fighting for scraps

    even with Bieber's coachella stuff going mad he's so low

    This is done by @thebag on instagram who does fantastic sales a***ysis. I believe they have Luminate access (same source as Billboard)

  • Jun 1
    ·
    1 reply
    mangotflu

    and second week sales and actually having a global #1 which GNX didn't, because it was a local album

    GNX didn't even get a #2 on the global 100, drake had the whole top 7

    luther spent 74 weeks on the Global 200, which is longer than every Drake song

  • Jun 1
    ·
    2 replies
    shaleirose

    luther spent 74 weeks on the Global 200, which is longer than every Drake song

    No #1
    No #2

  • Jun 1
    ·
    1 reply
    mangotflu

    No #1
    No #2

    Okay? When do y’all even reference the Global 200 in here

  • Let’s see ICEMAN get a 13-week #1 then we’ll talk

  • All y'all ITT need to touch grass

  • Jun 1
    ·
    2 replies
    shaleirose

    Okay? When do y’all even reference the Global 200 in here

    You moved on to obsessing over Global numbers to gloat The Weeknd's success after he became a huge US flop, now you're flipflopping back to US numbers because Kendrick's a global flop, interestig

  • Jun 1
    ·
    1 reply

    Especially @shaleirose

  • Jun 1
    ·
    2 replies
    mangotflu

    You moved on to obsessing over Global numbers to gloat The Weeknd's success after he became a huge US flop, now you're flipflopping back to US numbers because Kendrick's a global flop, interestig

    @shaleirose is a borderline loser

  • Jun 1
    ·
    1 reply
    mangotflu

    https://www.instagram.com/p/DZBiAgHtEOA/
    lmao s***y source but if this is real so many people in here have been so wrong its insane

    1) Taylor not even close to Drake, who has only just released a new album
    2) Morgan AND Bad Bunny about to overttake Taylor
    3) Future > The Weeknd when he hasn't dropped in over 2 years
    4) Cole & Kendrick both on 1.8m - far below Future, even though both dropped way more recent than Future
    5) Travis 1.1m

    All that talk about back catalog being sooo important meanwhile Trav/Kendrick/Cole are fighting for scraps

    even with Bieber's coachella stuff going mad he's so low

    Y’all be doing the absolute most over such marginal differences in units

    Future is 100K above The Weeknd, with like a billion more projects released

    Cole and Kendrick are 300K below Future, who, again, has a billion more projects than them combined. How is that “far below” them?

    The biggest shock on there (if the numbers are true, they’re most likely not) is Travis being as low as he is. Everyone else is about where they’re expected to be at this moment in time

  • Aisosa

    Especially @shaleirose

    I spent 23 minutes on KTT yesterday, get off my d***

  • The mental gymnastics over drake numbers is insanity

  • Jun 1
    ·
    1 reply
    mangotflu

    You moved on to obsessing over Global numbers to gloat The Weeknd's success after he became a huge US flop, now you're flipflopping back to US numbers because Kendrick's a global flop, interestig

    And still, I’ve never once mentioned the Global 200 on this website

    The Weeknd is still one of the most popular acts in the US regardless

  • Jun 1
    ·
    3 replies

    I don’t understand why y’all be in here throwing parades over sales differences that are as marginal and insignificant as 100K

    Like y’all sound crazy

  • mangotflu

    No #1
    No #2

    what were the actual streaming peaks?

  • shaleirose

    I don’t understand why y’all be in here throwing parades over sales differences that are as marginal and insignificant as 100K

    Like y’all sound crazy

    foreign losers and cacs living vicariously as cosplaying rap fans

    ask me how a french artist in france is doing or british artist in uk is doing on charts and i wouldnt know because why would anyone give a f***.

  • businessinsider

    @shaleirose is a borderline loser

    Borderline?

  • Jun 1
    ·
    1 reply
    shaleirose

    Y’all be doing the absolute most over such marginal differences in units

    Future is 100K above The Weeknd, with like a billion more projects released

    Cole and Kendrick are 300K below Future, who, again, has a billion more projects than them combined. How is that “far below” them?

    The biggest shock on there (if the numbers are true, they’re most likely not) is Travis being as low as he is. Everyone else is about where they’re expected to be at this moment in time

    Lil Wayne also has a billion projects and look at where he is vs Future lol, that excuse is silly

    Your same logic makes Morgan look like an absolute god lmao 149 songs vs Taylor's 530 and he's gonna be above her next month