Ai can be used to make dope art ONLY if youre already a dope artist imo
Random ppl using these tools will just make generic bullshit
if y’all dnt see the insane improvements in ai video the last couple of years idk what to tell u
F*** AI lol
if y’all dnt see the insane improvements in ai video the last couple of years idk what to tell u
Nah i was so hype for ai video generation years ago i wanted to edit music videos and do special effects
But its way too clumsy and not precise compared to actually learning software. Also f*** AI
if y’all dnt see the insane improvements in ai video the last couple of years idk what to tell u
Dont get me wrong its very impressive software, i just hate the potential for displacing humans from their jobs and how it could water down artforms
within 6 months there’s gonna be fire with this stuff
Ok u win i would watch this
Ai can be used to make dope art ONLY if youre already a dope artist imo
Random ppl using these tools will just make generic bullshit
Exactly what i mean. This is how a new genre is created. People who have passion taking things that are considered slop and making true art
Dont get me wrong its very impressive software, i just hate the potential for displacing humans from their jobs and how it could water down artforms
How is it taking away people’s jobs? If anything its democratizing art away from gatekeepers
How is it taking away people’s jobs? If anything its democratizing art away from gatekeepers
I guess when ppl say that, they mean that people who are explicitly "in those positions" already now have less leverage to fight for their wage I guess. Especially if an armchair critic can get the hang of prompting in a few weeks
The problem with AI is that it has the potential to do insane work in the hands of a very smart person.
But if you hand an AI tool to a person of average or below average competence it will often degrade the quality of work.
The special effects in movies are looking worse because people are relying on new technology for special effects but can barely make use of them.
It’s the same reason why all the new video games have a the same blurry filter out on the distance to “clean up the background” (a lazy ass design workaround).
Plus AI generative special effects are not the end all be all. The physics based special effects systems like the one used in the Avatar movie offers better results but requires a certain level of technical knowledge which most of these people lack in the field
How is it taking away people’s jobs? If anything its democratizing art away from gatekeepers
well if i can cut 80% of my team because i dont need writers, cameramen, VFX artists etc thats going to lead to less jobs and more competition (duh)
Exactly what i mean. This is how a new genre is created. People who have passion taking things that are considered slop and making true art
how is it a new genre if its s*** you've already seen but worse
I guess when ppl say that, they mean that people who are explicitly "in those positions" already now have less leverage to fight for their wage I guess. Especially if an armchair critic can get the hang of prompting in a few weeks
I think its good from a social perspective because it moves entertainment away from being monopolized by corporations
Feel like for actual filmmaking, the thing you need to look at is what Jia Zhangke managed to put together in a couple days.
Jia is one of the all time great Chinese directors, has a distinct voice and focus on China's rapid development and the problems stemming from it, and said he'd try out Seedance to see how it worked. This was his result and its not only a story you can follow, but retains his cinematic style pretty well, while serving as a reflection of AI in a convo between "AI Jia" and "real Jia" (both are AI) and reflections of his previous work
The problem with AI is that it has the potential to do insane work in the hands of a very smart person.
But if you hand an AI tool to a person of average or below average competence it will often degrade the quality of work.
The special effects in movies are looking worse because people are relying on new technology for special effects but can barely make use of them.
It’s the same reason why all the new video games have a the same blurry filter out on the distance to “clean up the background” (a lazy ass design workaround).
Plus AI generative special effects are not the end all be all. The physics based special effects systems like the one used in the Avatar movie offers better results but requires a certain level of technical knowledge which most of these people lack in the field
i think the idea that AI can do everything and theres no need to focus on traditional methods is very shortsighted, people who learn how to merge the two will be the most successful
It has 800k views because it’s 15 seconds long. Way different from a while movie in ai
ur right because that thing will actually make money
well if i can cut 80% of my team because i dont need writers, cameramen, VFX artists etc thats going to lead to less jobs and more competition (duh)
So goes the law of the market
Nah, if anything I just frel that it will force studios to reduce budgets and focus more on quality (hopefully) because rn were getting ballooned budget films that dont break even and are ass
Feel like for actual filmmaking, the thing you need to look at is what Jia Zhangke managed to put together in a couple days.
Jia is one of the all time great Chinese directors, has a distinct voice and focus on China's rapid development and the problems stemming from it, and said he'd try out Seedance to see how it worked. This was his result and its not only a story you can follow, but retains his cinematic style pretty well, while serving as a reflection of AI in a convo between "AI Jia" and "real Jia" (both are AI) and reflections of his previous work
https://twitter.com/EHuanglu/status/2023449238114320514AI loves this zoom in zoom out thing
It’s very impressive and will only get better but I’m not watching s*** without real human performances
Nah, if anything I just frel that it will force studios to reduce budgets and focus more on quality (hopefully) because rn were getting ballooned budget films that dont break even and are ass
well no this wont happen lol
I think its good from a social perspective because it moves entertainment away from being monopolized by corporations
It's still monopolized by corps because there's no true way (yet) to build your own "AI" that doesn't funnel usage costs back to them, right? You're still using their API
It's still monopolized by corps because there's no true way (yet) to build your own "AI" that doesn't funnel usage costs back to them, right? You're still using their API
Fair