Trash Star

5y

Though I do think the photos are pretty bad. She looks great but they're incredibly derivative of early-mid 2000's pop star photography to the point where they just look lifeless and emotionless. I'm pretty sure every teen focused magazine in the checkout lines during those years were filled with photos that look just like this. Props to him though if he's getting that bag repackaging something that was mass produced 20 years ago

KEYS

5y

She let him fund a whole photoshoot, and then still demanded control about its release. Ridiculous. She tried to use and discard his labour with no compensation, like he didnt invest his own time and money and doesnt have bills to pay.

Then she is gonna spin this about her right as a woman….. Wasnt the feminist movement about equality? Well if you want to control the photos then hire the man, under contract so you own the license to the photos. Legally this is no different then trying to control a paparazzi photos.

Smacked Voodoo

5y

Well it was posted without consent. The images can be considered to some as sexual/pornographic/NSFW in nature...let's take a couple seconds to put 2 and 2 together.

It might not be "revenge p***" in the manner that we know it, but it does very clearly fall into the category of nonconsensual p***ography.

Smacked Voodoo

5y

Well it was posted without consent. The images can be considered to some as sexual/pornographic/NSFW in nature...let's take a couple seconds to put 2 and 2 together.

It might not be "revenge p***" in the manner that we know it, but it does very clearly fall into the category of nonconsensual p***ography.

ragedsycokiller

5y

Eh you could argue this is more artistic than p***ographic without any nudity though.

We've seen plenty other shoots from musicians like this that wouldn't be called p***ographic

Smacked Voodoo

5y

P***ography can still be art, art can still be p***ographic

Smacked Voodoo

5y

P***ography can still be art, art can still be p***ographic

Smacked Voodoo

5y

P***ography can still be art, art can still be p***ographic

Shelby

5y

this whole situation f***ed up

I think they should pay the photographer for his time even though they didn't like the pics, but he's such an a****** for leaking these pics, I'm feeling sorry for her rn

Smacked Voodoo

5y

Well it was posted without consent. The images can be considered to some as sexual/pornographic/NSFW in nature...let's take a couple seconds to put 2 and 2 together.

It might not be "revenge p***" in the manner that we know it, but it does very clearly fall into the category of nonconsensual p***ography.

Mango

5y

P***ography that is art

Art that is p***ography

KEYS

5y

She let him fund a whole photoshoot, and then still demanded control about its release. Ridiculous. She tried to use and discard his labour with no compensation, like he didnt invest his own time and money and doesnt have bills to pay.

Then she is gonna spin this about her right as a woman….. Wasnt the feminist movement about equality? Well if you want to control the photos then hire the man, under contract so you own the license to the photos. Legally this is no different then trying to control a paparazzi photos.

Smacked Voodoo

5y

Maserati is an excellent artisté

KEYS

5y

She let him fund a whole photoshoot, and then still demanded control about its release. Ridiculous. She tried to use and discard his labour with no compensation, like he didnt invest his own time and money and doesnt have bills to pay.

Then she is gonna spin this about her right as a woman….. Wasnt the feminist movement about equality? Well if you want to control the photos then hire the man, under contract so you own the license to the photos. Legally this is no different then trying to control a paparazzi photos.

NICEMAN

5y

"can be considered to be p***ographic or sexual in nature" is where I disagree. She's just posing in a bikini, there's nothing sexual about these imo. And this was a whole ass photoshoot SZA agreed to do. They weren't intended to be private and if she had any strong moral objections to the photos, I don't think she would have taken them in the first place

To me, being a victim of revenge p*** means sharing something private (nudity or not) with someone else and trusting them to keep it private. But then they go ahead and make it public.

Legally speaking, there has to be some sort of harm to SZA. I don't see how this photoshoot would cause that when we've seen her in her underwear before in music videos and IG posts