What a reach lmao
The mans just saying the money put behind this study was a waste of time
Theres more pressing s*** on the field of psychology to study than some revived fad
So what do you propose, more limits on the amount of PHD students who can specialize in personality psychology? Because I would argue that the most pressing field is clinical psychology and forensic for example and that every personality psychology study is arguably less pressing than research in those.
How far are you willing to go with limiting academic freedom like that
Well...
https://ktt2.com/does-capitalism-promote-narcissism-32507407
Yes.
The nature of capitalism is to have what people don't so you can make money off them. The more frequently you can get them to rely on you, the better your "business model". Even if it means ripping people off.
Most marketing is tricking people into buying stuff they don't need. Imagine having financial stability and then imploring people with way less to buy your s***, regardless of how broke they are and if they even really need it. That's some real cut throat s***.
Same thing, these kind of studies are really irrelevant to everybody besides maybe people like the ones in your field of study but mf they ain't include me or many smart mfs i know into the equation. So it's already false by default
I could easily make the same argument for sports fans, people who enjoy fastfood, people who go to the gym etc etc
It just doesn't make sense to me given how vastly different we all are. And it doesn't matter at the end of the day either so who cares
Also i dare anybody to start doing a minor in Western Esotericism and tell me the concepts and returning motifs are easy to grasp. That's why i said, it also matters to specify who are we talking about. Because yes, i roll my eyes too when i see a random mf talk about ''oh we don't match cause i'm a scorpio'' or whatever
The concepts of esotericism are hard to grasp because they’re bullshit that completely at odds with reality so yeah they don’t really connect with your average person
So what do you propose, more limits on the amount of PHD students who can specialize in personality psychology? Because I would argue that the most pressing field is clinical psychology and forensic for example and that every personality psychology study is arguably less pressing than research in those.
How far are you willing to go with limiting academic freedom like that
The conclusions of this study were obvious tho
Its to be expected of anyone who believes in misinformation
However
If anything itd be more pressing to focus a study on antivaxxers or stop the steal loons cause they pose an actual threat
then you can come up with specific solutions to those specific, more pressing types of misinfo
Lets say ppl who believe in astrology and stop the steal have the same f***ed up neural response, which is likely true. However the only way youre going to talk someone off of the ledge is dismantling the specific subject of their ire
At the end of the day i dont really care what academia does with its money because its largely going to good causes. Its just annoying to see such a lame fad being taken this seriously
Wtf has race to do with this YIKES
Classic c***European getting triggered the second race is mentioned even though that’s not the point dude was getting at
But I forgot you have free healthcare so race doesn’t exist there so I understand why this is a difficult topic for you
The conclusions of this study were obvious tho
Its to be expected of anyone who believes in misinformation
https://www.psypost.org/2021/08/study-identifies-psychological-pathways-that-explain-how-narcissism-predicts-support-for-donald-trump-61711
However
If anything itd be more pressing to focus a study on antivaxxers or stop the steal loons cause they pose an actual threat
then you can come up with specific solutions to those specific, more pressing types of misinfo
Lets say ppl who believe in astrology and stop the steal have the same f***ed up neural response, which is likely true. However the only way youre going to talk someone off of the ledge is dismantling the specific subject of their ire
At the end of the day i dont really care what academia does with its money because its largely going to good causes. Its just annoying to see such a lame fad being taken this seriously
I wouldn't put misinformation in the same category as this tho.
And this study isn't really taking the fad seriously, it's seriously studying the causes behind the fad.
And I mean there are plenty of studies on antivaxers, and on a much larger scale with higher budgets too.
This one study doesn't undermine that.
The conclusions of this study were obvious tho
Its to be expected of anyone who believes in misinformation
https://www.psypost.org/2021/08/study-identifies-psychological-pathways-that-explain-how-narcissism-predicts-support-for-donald-trump-61711
However
If anything itd be more pressing to focus a study on antivaxxers or stop the steal loons cause they pose an actual threat
then you can come up with specific solutions to those specific, more pressing types of misinfo
Lets say ppl who believe in astrology and stop the steal have the same f***ed up neural response, which is likely true. However the only way youre going to talk someone off of the ledge is dismantling the specific subject of their ire
At the end of the day i dont really care what academia does with its money because its largely going to good causes. Its just annoying to see such a lame fad being taken this seriously
This study and other studies are not mutually exclusive...
Lot of people talking on science when they don't understand anything about it (which is understandable because a lot of academic stuff is obfuscated)
having low IQ is based tho
smarties just suffer under the burden of their thoughts complaining about existentialism or how they can't get p****
Lot of people talking on science when they don't understand anything about it (which is understandable because a lot of academic stuff is obfuscated)
Nice subtweet
The truth hurts brother!
Then actually respond to what i was saying mr psych major
Put that college debt into action
Then actually respond to what i was saying mr psych major
Put that college debt into action
What do you want me to respond to?
You assume and state the conclusion is expected but there are many times where things that have been believed to be intuitively true have been supported otherwise by scientific experiments
As already mentioned, the study in OP is not mutually exclusive to COVID/antivax studies, unless you say we should shut down any funding period for studies that aren't about the most pressing social issues
Seems like you want to limit academic freedom for an arbitrary reason because you see surface level interpretations of studies and think "wow! waste of time!"
Lot of people talking on science when they don't understand anything about it (which is understandable because a lot of academic stuff is obfuscated)

guys today is moon rising in scorpio and p**** rising in peices, astrologist told me it means blessing will be received by ktt2
I don’t use astrology but there was one JP Morgan who once famously said
“Millionaires don't need astrologers, but billionaires do”
Also there are many sports teams who openly practice astrology. The Chicago Bulls (Taurus). The Taurus is also symbolized in many films even 2001 A Space Odyssey.
Lebron “The Goat” James. Born as a Capricorn and the Goat is the Capricorn sign.
These types of articles are contrived because when one sees how the higher ups use allusions of astrology in their works, you can see the difference between low iq astrology and real astrology. The Chaldeans practiced the og form of it and I’m pretty sure that’s been passed down to today.
lebron "the goat"