Deciding now to call exclusives anti consumer is wild.
Exclusives are always anti consumer unless they only exist because they are exclusives. Something like Bloodborne that was a collaboration between From Soft and Sony and funded by Sony, this is a game that wouldn’t have come out if it wasn’t an exclusive.
This on the other hand is a game that was going to come out, microsoft bought Bethesda and made the game an exclusive because there’s not really much else to play on their ecosystem
Exclusives are always anti consumer unless they only exist because they are exclusives. Something like Bloodborne that was a collaboration between From Soft and Sony and funded by Sony, this is a game that wouldn’t have come out if it wasn’t an exclusive.
This on the other hand is a game that was going to come out, microsoft bought Bethesda and made the game an exclusive because there’s not really much else to play on their ecosystem
Don’t care. Exclusives were the bragging part for Sony all last gen. No point in b****ing about anti consumer exclusives now.
Exclusives are always anti consumer unless they only exist because they are exclusives. Something like Bloodborne that was a collaboration between From Soft and Sony and funded by Sony, this is a game that wouldn’t have come out if it wasn’t an exclusive.
This on the other hand is a game that was going to come out, microsoft bought Bethesda and made the game an exclusive because there’s not really much else to play on their ecosystem
Just sounds like hypocrisy to me
Don’t care. Exclusives were the bragging part for Sony all last gen. No point in b****ing about anti consumer exclusives now.
You can’t just say you don’t care
It’s like saying Bayonetta 3 being an exclusive is stupid, that s*** wouldn’t have existed without Nintendo.
You can’t just say you don’t care
It’s like saying Bayonetta 3 being an exclusive is stupid, that s*** wouldn’t have existed without Nintendo.
I can say I don’t care. MLB is literally only on Xbox now because the league themselves had to intervene. Spider-Man is exclusive, and Sony makes a point to keep him exclusive even on cross platform games like The Avengers. You’re b****ing now makes no sense.
These beloved games wouldn’t have existed if they weren’t for those platforms/consoles. This is why competition is important. We get games that otherwise wouldn’t exist
Sony literally tried to pay Bethesda to have exclusive rights on Starfield
Ok, did i say that’s a good thing? Sony does plenty of anti consumer s*** too
Ok, did i say that’s a good thing? Sony does plenty of anti consumer s*** too
Then stfu. It’s not changing that’s the direction you idiot gamers turned this into so now we have to deal with exclusives.
Then stfu. It’s not changing that’s the direction you idiot gamers turned this into so now we have to deal with exclusives.
I won’t stop calling out anti consumerism
And idk who you’re talking about, wym we did this
Ok, did i say that’s a good thing? Sony does plenty of anti consumer s*** too
Is it really anti consumer though. All of their games will be free on gamepass
Sounds like the consumers are winning to me
Is it really anti consumer though. All of their games will be free on gamepass
Sounds like the consumers are winning to me
Only the consumers that have game pass but others don’t get to play these games
I have money now and can buy whatever i want, but i remember as a kid not being able to afford some consoles and having to watch other people talk about cool games i’ve always wanted to play like Tloz tp and SS.
There was no need for this tbh, now someone else will have to feel this way
I won’t stop calling out anti consumerism
And idk who you’re talking about, wym we did this
You're yelling into the void.
I mean all last gen what was said was Xbox had no games and exclusives for PS4 were a good thing. They were touted for the exclusivity.
You're yelling into the void.
I mean all last gen what was said was Xbox had no games and exclusives for PS4 were a good thing. They were touted for the exclusivity.
These games were made by sony though, Naughty Dog is a part of sony, SIE Santa Monica studios is a part of Sony, like 343 games is a part of xbox
These games were made by sony though, Naughty Dog is a part of sony, SIE Santa Monica studios is a part of Sony, like 343 games is a part of xbox
Naughty Dog, LLC (formerly JAM Software, Inc.) is an American first-party video game developer based in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Andy Gavin and Jason Rubin in 1984, the studio was acquired by Sony Computer Entertainment in 2001.
Meanwhile their actual in-house Japanese game dev teams are falling apart time and time again
Naughty Dog, LLC (formerly JAM Software, Inc.) is an American first-party video game developer based in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Andy Gavin and Jason Rubin in 1984, the studio was acquired by Sony Computer Entertainment in 2001.
Meanwhile their actual in-house Japanese game dev teams are falling apart time and time again
They’ve been making games for sony for how long though...
And the sony japan studio was betrayed, they make great games but Sony wants to pander to the western audience more
These games were made by sony though, Naughty Dog is a part of sony, SIE Santa Monica studios is a part of Sony, like 343 games is a part of xbox
Wasn’t always a Sony studio, just like Zenimax wasn’t always Microsoft. What’s your point?
F*** off lmaoo
Wasn’t always a Sony studio, just like Zenimax wasn’t always Microsoft. What’s your point?
F*** off lmaoo
I mean then microsoft has no game studios