Finally a fresh schizo take

Krishna what does any of this mean
its just funny right wing nonsense thats basically incomprehensible because its just a circlejerk rather than real discourse
its just funny right wing nonsense thats basically incomprehensible because its just a circlejerk rather than real discourse
American frankito basically
American frankito basically
basically but this is what like 50% of rw twitter is like
basically but this is what like 50% of rw twitter is like
Gonna unblock him I miss his rants
@FranquitoReynolds can not go band for band with me
globohomo
What’s so funny is that this is one of those things which rw people forgot the actual meaning of and then now it just means something else
it was originally supposed to be short for “global homogeny” but since rw people are braindead it now means what you think it means
showing this to a victorian child
That "KGB agent tells secrets" video that YouTube loves to recommend broke people's minds
That "KGB agent tells secrets" video that YouTube loves to recommend broke people's minds
“Soviet agents are why American culture is degenerate” legit the fattest cope of all time
this is emu
contra stay up and twitter stay hating
What legal euthanasia does to a mf
I HATE IT HERE
I HATE IT HERE
I HATE IT HERE
Maybe she told Hillary to read the bread book!! Who knows that would be great for the left
https://twitter.com/cryincilantro98/status/1572072445351264258
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO
i f***ing HATE TWITTER!!!!!
i am starting to hate like, every social media now, dude
just full of stupid ass debates, arguments, topics.. smh
Thank you
Are there any ideas within this in regards to what it would take for the first world working class to actualize its revolutionary potential (and I guess if I'm asking that I gotta ask why it's thought there is such limited revolutionary potential)
Also is there any thoughts in regards to working class people from third world countries that get displaced by the activities of the first world and end up laboring in first world countries?
Why it's thought there is such limited revolutionary potential
Basically believe that working class in the global north do not have rev potential in a sense, because they benefit from imperialism and the status quo
Settlers even though controversial and has some liberal a***ysis is a good primer to third worldism. Gives great historical examples of times when white communists betrayed black communists for capital
goodreads.com/book/show/3184732-settlers?ref=nav_sb_ss_4_9
Since it is a quite controversial book, intentionally look for the dissenting opinions, read them, and see what you think
Are there any ideas within this in regards to what it would take for the first world working class to actualize its revolutionary potential
Third-worldists recognize that there are lumpen (lowest 'tier' of proleteriat, those the least developed in their class education, those who live in squalor / poverty) within the global north with immense revolutionary potential precisely because they do not reap the benefits of imperialism, and this is where third worldists say most work is done (e.g. homeless, migrant workers, etc)
Thirdworldism can be dangerous as a communist in the global north just do the fact you cna sit on your ass and not do anything. So this is why third-worldism is looked down upon
@Scratchin_Bandit feeling very third worldist today