"The demand to give up the illusions about its condition is the demand to give up a condition that needs illusions"
Eric Andre Yes Isolated
!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isdaA1yAgbkPowerful vox for mysterious music
He's just a nerd who said some crayz things abt planning bro nobody cares for his cultural a***yses anyway
if i see him it’s on sight
beincrypto.com/crypto-investors-see-themselves-potential-billionaires
Crypto Investors: Nearly 70% Still See Themselves as Potential Billionaires
what’s this I hear about a railroad strike
The last i heard was about a potential railroad strike being talked about but haven't heard much sense
This in mainstream news? (I guess it would have to be if it was actually going down)
Hey emu
My comment was inspired by people criticizing you for mentioning cockshott, I’ve mentioned haz here before and had similar criticism as you
My comment was inspired by people criticizing you for mentioning cockshott, I’ve mentioned haz here before and had similar criticism as you
are u comparing Cockshott and Haz
Cockshott has interesting things to say for example his works on Economic planning, Haz is just best left alone to die in obscurity he gives nothing of value and clearly just grifting, which u can see in the various contradictions of his positions claiming Vietnam is revisionist while upholding Modern China at the same time upholding the Cultural Revolution
are u comparing Cockshott and Haz
Cockshott has interesting things to say for example his works on Economic planning, Haz is just best left alone to die in obscurity he gives nothing of value and clearly just grifting, which u can see in the various contradictions of his positions claiming Vietnam is revisionist while upholding Modern China at the same time upholding the Cultural Revolution
Damn him and Cockshott in the same bag? That's crazy
Cockshott Andrew Tate link up when
Sike
are u comparing Cockshott and Haz
Cockshott has interesting things to say for example his works on Economic planning, Haz is just best left alone to die in obscurity he gives nothing of value and clearly just grifting, which u can see in the various contradictions of his positions claiming Vietnam is revisionist while upholding Modern China at the same time upholding the Cultural Revolution
The criticism was similar
The criticism was similar
the content is different Cockshott gives us of something of value and use.
What does Haz give that’s worthy of being defended of?
the content is different Cockshott gives us of something of value and use.
What does Haz give that’s worthy of being defended of?
Not sure what you mean, he’s a communist and promotes it
Not sure what you mean, he’s a communist and promotes it
He's not a communist, it's more about what you believe than the label. He's a larouchite.
Not sure what you mean, he’s a communist and promotes it
Calling yourself a communist isn’t enough, the actual content he spews is far from any communist org or tendency at all other than being vaguely similar to the failed Browder line of the CPUSA. He doesn’t organize at all, other than trying to get his fans into the CPUSA which ended terribly and then onwards decided to be a wrecker it seems.
So his actions and ideas aren’t actually Communist and he just claims to be, the people that end up following him don’t end up learning what communism at about at all, other than someone who claims to be a communist spewing whatever he thinks would generate him the most clicks.
Also what does his following do other than become its own niche subculture on the internet what’s the use of that if they don’t actually engage with the political in real life, though this part of the criticism i have isn’t just applicable to Has and to most online debaters to be fair, funny enough i’m reading Plato rn and all these people just remind me of the sophists.
Haz is just debating other online losers and more concerned on putting on a show for the niche following he found, like with that little era he had talking with egirls lol.
He's not a communist, it's more about what you believe than the label. He's a larouchite.
What I’m saying is just because these people are not socially liberal, doesn’t mean they are not communist. Stalin was more socially conservative than both of them, but is praised. The working class is what it was all about
What I’m saying is just because these people are not socially liberal, doesn’t mean they are not communist. Stalin was more socially conservative than both of them, but is praised. The working class is what it was all about
Haz is not a communist because none of his beliefs have anything to do with actual communism
It has nothing to do with his social position which in itself is wildly unprincipled as well
What I’m saying is just because these people are not socially liberal, doesn’t mean they are not communist. Stalin was more socially conservative than both of them, but is praised. The working class is what it was all about
We aren’t saying they aren’t communist cause they aren’t socially liberal we’re saying they aren’t communist cause they don’t know what being a communist is