“Authoritarianism” is not a real thing
All states rule on authority
man’s posting like countries that he support that aren’t “authoritarian” like england and usa haven’t been bullying or allowing people from their ruling class bully weaker nations like the iraq war of Libya
or like Bill Gates sterilizing indian women without their consent man liberals are trash
man’s posting like countries that he support that aren’t “authoritarian” like england and usa haven’t been bullying or allowing people from their ruling class bully weaker nations like the iraq war of Libya
Some states are more authoritarian because their leaders are meanies and not because of the material conditions of constantly being under siege with half the world trying to coup your government
i welcome a nuclear holocaust as long as the first nukes land on England or Bill Gates personal house
i welcome a nuclear holocaust as long as the first nukes land on England or Bill Gates personal house
dap and rep for saying england and not wales, comrade 🏴✊
man’s posting like countries that he support that aren’t “authoritarian” like england and usa haven’t been bullying or allowing people from their ruling class bully weaker nations like the iraq war of Libya
France isn’t authoritarian
“Mali sounds”
dap and rep for saying england and not wales, comrade 🏴✊
the welish and irish never colonized India i don’t got beef with em !
“Authoritarianism” is not a real thing
All states rule on authority
There's a definetely a scale of force and consent
idk how i can convince people that "gentle capitalism" doesn't exist
What do you mean
There's a definetely a scale of force and consent
State structures can’t exist without some sort of popular consent, even the oligarchical ones
And we may ask “why would a states that oppresses its own people exist with their popular support?” But we can look at the United States to see this contradiction occur firsthand
State structures can’t exist without some sort of popular consent, even the oligarchical ones
And we may ask “why would a states that oppresses its own people exist with their popular support?” But we can look at the United States to see this contradiction occur firsthand
And I feel as though this is a contradiction that, if not solved, becomes a major contributor to fascist thought
wrong thread, next time you think of posting please think of it belongs itt or the one i’m going to link
https://ktt2.com/social-democracy-and-social-liberalism-thread-93589
State structures can’t exist without some sort of popular consent, even the oligarchical ones
And we may ask “why would a states that oppresses its own people exist with their popular support?” But we can look at the United States to see this contradiction occur firsthand
well there's a difference between viewing a state or authority as "legitimate" and viewing a state or authority as representative. popular support isn't necessarily needed for the affirmation of something existing whether or not you believe yourself to be part of that in-group/out-group or not.
even the most out of their mind esoteric neonazis or the most obtuse anarchists still recognize the US as a state power they live under. even people who say stuff like "not my president" or something still are ultimately acknowledging a state conceptually even if they attempt (barely lol) to reject those in power; similarly, those who seek to undermine a state still ultimately recognize the state exists hence why they wish to undermine it (or destroy it). It's not too dismilar from how people hate police or other authorities are likely going to listen to them anyway if they're pulled over or being served something - there's more to it than the show of force or fact that the officer has a gun or whatever. It's a wider social acknowledgement of role which captures a population wider and more influential than just an individual
i'm not sure if i'd say it's "popular consent" that determines a state as much as it is social conditioning. while en-masse, to some degree, yes, there is an abstract "consent", it's not really a "decision" of "consent/non-consent" as much as a latent acceptance of an assumed structure
man’s posting like countries that he support that aren’t “authoritarian” like england and usa haven’t been bullying or allowing people from their ruling class bully weaker nations like the iraq war of Libya
It's all bad lol
I only really speak on ukraine now anyway
Also I'm no fan of Bill Gates cause I dont like billionaires but youre gonna need some proof on that sterilisation claim
It's all bad lol
I only really speak on ukraine now anyway
Also I'm no fan of Bill Gates cause I dont like billionaires but youre gonna need some proof on that sterilisation claim
https://www.freepressjournal.in/viral/arrestbillgates-heres-why-indians-are-enraged-at-gates-foundation
“Five were evidently unrelated to the vaccine: One girl drowned in a quarry; another died from a snake bite; two committed suicide by ingesting pesticides; and one died from complications of malaria. The causes of death for the other two girls were less certain: one possibly from pyrexia, or high fever, and a second from a suspected cerebral hemorrhage.” ( here )
Many reasons to hate gates but I'm sus of the truth of this one. Its always better to keep it factual regardless
It's all bad lol
I only really speak on ukraine now anyway
Also I'm no fan of Bill Gates cause I dont like billionaires but youre gonna need some proof on that sterilisation claim
yeah but one can easily see the difference in attitude u have towards tony blair regime and putins when discussing their wars, it’s easy to say it’s all bad or u hate billionaires when all the plolitical action you support just end up profiting these people more like rich weapon manufacturers
and u can speak more than ukraine look at the middle east only democracy starting to murder kids in Palestine once again or prob just getting more outreach in the west and never truly stopped or in the worlds biggest democracy in India committing genocide against the Adavasi people for mining companies to use their land.
and here cracker
pop.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/USAID%20sterilization%20report.pdf
crazy how i tried to look for that again i was bombarded by fact checkers tm when i searched up bill gates sterilization a few years ago that was the first result
“Five were evidently unrelated to the vaccine: One girl drowned in a quarry; another died from a snake bite; two committed suicide by ingesting pesticides; and one died from complications of malaria. The causes of death for the other two girls were less certain: one possibly from pyrexia, or high fever, and a second from a suspected cerebral hemorrhage.” ( here )
Many reasons to hate gates but I'm sus of the truth of this one. Its always better to keep it factual regardless
Source is Bill Gates foundation news letter or what
yeah but one can easily see the difference in attitude u have towards tony blair regime and putins when discussing their wars, it’s easy to say it’s all bad or u hate billionaires when all the plolitical action you support just end up profiting these people more like rich weapon manufacturers
and u can speak more than ukraine look at the middle east only democracy starting to murder kids in Palestine once again or prob just getting more outreach in the west and never truly stopped or in the worlds biggest democracy in India committing genocide against the Adavasi people for mining companies to use their land.
and here cracker
https://www.pop.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/USAID%20sterilization%20report.pdf
F*** Tony Blair he's a ghoul. Im glad he was forced out. He was either an idiot or an evil idiot with a messiah complex. The man's gone and labour is now led entirely by people who either opposed or were not in politics at the time of Iraq. Its not justice but that's not what I support
I dont support Israeli settlements or Hindu nationalism either. I'm especially interested in Ukraine as it is closer to home to me, I seldom of ever comment on the others and when I do I tend to be instinctively pro palestine
Link
science.org/content/article/indian-parliament-comes-down-hard-cervical-cancer-trial-rev2
This is the source reuters cited. Indian parliament claimed the organisation wasn't complicit in the deaths. Will edit with a link to reuters
https://www.science.org/content/article/indian-parliament-comes-down-hard-cervical-cancer-trial-rev2
This is the source reuters cited. Indian parliament claimed the organisation wasn't complicit in the deaths. Will edit with a link to reuters
That's not what the Indian government said lmao learn how to read illiterate ass mf