Why the f*** do people call Stalin easy to read. HE rambles about the stupidest s*** ever, makes his books so f***ing boring
i always found him easy to read cause how direct he is and the way he quoted and referenced other people like in anarchism or socialism was way easier to read along with compared to like Lenin during empiro criticism
never seen any “leftist” deny the labour aristocracy
have definitely seen breadtuber types do this among other things
i dont even know why those people call themselves left, theyre basically right wingers with socially progressive views
It's a bit funny how in the face of overwhelming evidence people who argue against the concept of labor aristocracy can only say "its inconvenient to believe this so i will simply choose not to"

labor aristocracy doesnt exist because workers in the north are homophobic, you heard it here folks.
marxists.org
labor aristocracy doesnt exist because workers in the north are homophobic, you heard it here folks.
marxists.org
They have hundreds of documents, they are just a library. The author is some Trotskyist wacko
labor aristocracy doesnt exist because workers in the north are homophobic, you heard it here folks.
marxists.org
They got a bunch of shyt some outright schizo shyt too it's not their opinion or anything
That being said you have to tell Global North proletarians that the benefits of socialism outweigh the benefits of imperialism
They have hundreds of documents, they are just a library. The author is some Trotskyist wacko
@Womanpuncher69 was saying theyve never seen a leftist deny the theory so i was just showing that people definitely have
Labor aristocracy exists but the bs starts when people say there's no proletariat in the west, that everybody's just bourgeois
Labor aristocracy exists but the bs starts when people say there's no proletariat in the west, that everybody's just bourgeois
This is how some define the labor aristocracy, that they're not proletarian and that the entirety of the west is labor aristocracy and that's just bs
@Womanpuncher69 was saying theyve never seen a leftist deny the theory so i was just showing that people definitely have
bmcc.cuny.edu/faculty/charles-post write him a mail
https://www.bmcc.cuny.edu/faculty/charles-post/ write him a mail
no f***ing way he's a CUNY professor
i went to a CUNY college back when i was still in schooling (not this one though).
Labor aristocracy exists but the bs starts when people say there's no proletariat in the west, that everybody's just bourgeois
People saying that are mostly Maoist Third Worldists who live in said countries and want to cope with being armchairists who never do anything because "it wouldn't matter anyway"
They got a bunch of shyt some outright schizo shyt too it's not their opinion or anything
marxists.org/archive/posadas/1968/06/flyingsaucers.html
Forbidden knowledge
no f***ing way he's a CUNY professor
i went to a CUNY college back when i was still in schooling (not this one though).
never seen any “leftist” deny the labour aristocracy
I’ve seen people deny the idea that the American proletariat benefit from imperialism, if that counts
https://www.bmcc.cuny.edu/wp-content/uploads/ported/faculty/upload/Reply%20to%20Cope,%20RPE,%202014.pdf

ironic
Labor aristocracy exists but the bs starts when people say there's no proletariat in the west, that everybody's just bourgeois
Also gets funny when they take it one step further and say entire countries are of proletarian nature just because they are imperialized
Also gets funny when they take it one step further and say entire countries are of proletarian nature just because they are imperialized
im a personal fan of the "all of China is actually proletariat" takes
The real redpill is that the never released volume of Das Kapital on international trade would have most likely shown how unequal exchange between core and periphery works in terms of the Law of Value
Which traditionally many Marxists have denied until this day, instead basing imperialism not off exchange but political and societal circumstances surrounding exchange
The reality is international trade can be unequal merely because of currency rates and arbitrage
Global trade win win co-operation globalization fair trade productive forces
“The alms given to a naked man in the street do not fulfil the obligations of the state, which owes to every citizen a certain subsistence, a proper nourishment, convenient clothing, and a kind of life not incompatible with health.“
Based de Montesquieu
“The alms given to a naked man in the street do not fulfil the obligations of the state, which owes to every citizen a certain subsistence, a proper nourishment, convenient clothing, and a kind of life not incompatible with health.“
Based de Montesquieu
NOOOOO U CANT SAY THAT