also its nice to see MLs/maoists taking "decolonization" rhetoric and using it to support their big daddy empires' ideologies of well-documented imperialism (that you don't need wikipedia to find) :)
Bro then the next sentence...
"Then: some fifteen years later, Belgium transferred, to the newly independent Congo, the debts it had incurred in order to exploit those natural resources as well as its population"
So parasitic
...
Here's some more parasitic white ppl antics:
At the end of the first World War, the Treaty of Versailles, imposed on Germany the payment of huge compensations for war debt and reparation 1. Germany soon found it difficult to pay and this led to social discontent.... soon lead to everyone not payi and the industrialized world plummeting
Then they learned from their mistakes and next in WW2 implemented Marshall plan which gave grants so they weren't debt locked and made Europe prosperous
The US knows the difference between loans and grants but continues to give loans.... allegedly to finance the Third World’s development.
Such refusal shows that creditors do not really want these countries to develop and be rid of their debts but rather to extract $ and implement favorable reforms
"From 1954 to 1961, for example, South Korea received more grants from the United States than the WB lent to all independent Third World countries
"Because it was strategically located in relation to China and the USSR, a small farming country like South Korea benefited from US largesse. During the same period Taiwan received about $800 million. 5"
The US knows the difference between loans and grants but continues to give loans.... allegedly to finance the Third World’s development.
Such refusal shows that creditors do not really want these countries to develop and be rid of their debts but rather to extract $ and implement favorable reforms
this is the discouraging truth lol
also its nice to see MLs/maoists taking "decolonization" rhetoric and using it to support their big daddy empires' ideologies of well-documented imperialism (that you don't need wikipedia to find) :)
can u elaborate who’s supporting imperialism specifically
edit: u talking about that stalin video posted?
i’ll have to watch it to get an opinion on what the video was saying
that being said discussion of stalin is inseparable and relevant to socialist history regardless,
i will say there is a bit of
vibes when stalin gets posted and thus almost requires a disclaimer to why he was posted to non socialists (and those not fully educated to the scope of his legacy and both his accomplishments and the negatives)
i essentially have been reserving judgment on the most all socialist world leaders because i now put them on the same level as other world leaders, in terms of every world leader will seem to want more power for their nation and also be demonized by the opposing ideologies or economic systems or what have you.

And yet the gulags at their height still had less prisoners per capita than the USA does right now
And yet the gulags at their height still had less prisoners per capita than the USA does right now
also its nice to see MLs/maoists taking "decolonization" rhetoric and using it to support their big daddy empires' ideologies of well-documented imperialism (that you don't need wikipedia to find) :)
Motherfucka Maoists don’t even have a country we support, we just got dudes in the jungle with ak47s
so did the capitalist stop posting here and now we gotta battle the anarchists or Left Communists? now ?
so did the capitalist stop posting here and now we gotta battle the anarchists or Left Communists? now ?
Well sniper is a libertarian socialist apparently. But no idea why so many ppl love coming in here to b**** and moan about "authoritarianism"
wikipedia is the most well-maintained encyclopedia in the world with thousands of editors
why is this a gotcha?
you know revisions can be viewed by the public right, and if someone notices an inconsistency in the article, it will be revised, you could even edit wikipedia yourself with an account and get involved with the editing process
?
he is a nazi and he has made 1/3 of Wikipedia's articles
how is me posting this even close to me being anti-Semitic
Motherfucka Maoists don’t even have a country we support, we just got dudes in the jungle with ak47s
facts
And yet the gulags at their height still had less prisoners per capita than the USA does right now
lol
expansionism also doesn't equal imperialism
two completely different things
comparing their expansionism to something like the U.S is flawed because the U.S hated their minorities, and stripped them of their rights, and that didn't happen in the USSR
just in once example, the USSR minorities were legally required to be taught in their native tongue
like what point is there in critiquing socialist leaders or nations like this?
they have done more in the past 100+ years than any other anarchist project/socdem for the globally oppressed.
i just don't understand why someone can't critically support them despite their f***ups. if you call yourself a marxist, realize you're not using a material lens at this point, and your thoughts are very idealist, because "if they don't fit into my (western conceptions) then they are bad and authoritarian!) ... which will never happen
like what point is there in critiquing socialist leaders or nations like this?
they have done more in the past 100+ years than any other anarchist project/socdem for the globally oppressed.
i just don't understand why someone can't critically support them despite their f***ups. if you call yourself a marxist, realize you're not using a material lens at this point, and your thoughts are very idealist, because "if they don't fit into my (western conceptions) then they are bad and authoritarian!) ... which will never happen
Exactly. Spot on.
Out of my own curiosity.. what do you guys think was socialist about the USSR?
Out of my own curiosity.. what do you guys think was socialist about the USSR?
Everything
Stop posting in here
Everything
Stop posting in here
Like what