Communism Thread

Page 1333 of 1355
Reply
  • May 25, 2025
    PFLP optimisticman

    Im gonna ignore the strawman and go back to your original reply where u said people who support bushnell are centering first worlders, how exactly does that allign with the fact that the palestinian resistance found his actions meaningful?

    I’m sure the starving gazan children buried under rubble appreciate his meaningful sacrifice. White savior bullshit

  • May 25, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    krishna bound

    To me the implication Bushnell committed meaningful praxis through suicide essentially implies permanent revolution is achieved less through collective revolutionary action and more through individualized acts that “imply” revolutionary intent or belief. A lot of Trotskyism (not literally ofc but by indirect extension) ends up treating Marxism as a moral source rather than a science

    You clearly have no idea what trotskyism or permanent revolution even is. Sit down lil bro

  • May 25, 2025
    krishna bound

    To me the implication Bushnell committed meaningful praxis through suicide essentially implies permanent revolution is achieved less through collective revolutionary action and more through individualized acts that “imply” revolutionary intent or belief. A lot of Trotskyism (not literally ofc but by indirect extension) ends up treating Marxism as a moral source rather than a science

    Did he even mention anything socialist/marxist except for the overlapping desire for palеstinian libеration i dont remember

  • May 25, 2025
    ·
    2 replies

    I love when these dumbasses just use trotskyism as a buzzword for anything counter revolutionary. The western left for u

  • May 25, 2025
    PFLP optimisticman

    I love when these dumbasses just use trotskyism as a buzzword for anything counter revolutionary. The western left for u

    i too dislike Stalin

  • May 25, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    spongebob

    I understand finding meaning in that but I also think it is a superior to stay alive if possible.

    I think he was in serious pain over what happened and its a shame that he couldn't have been a continued living voice.

    But I get what your angle is

    R u a communist?

  • May 25, 2025
    ·
    2 replies
    PFLP optimisticman

    You clearly have no idea what trotskyism or permanent revolution even is. Sit down lil bro

    Trotsky’s permanent revolution is a load of bullshit that takes a material concept from Marx and transforms it into a political morality. The fact you can’t draw conclusions or observations outside of literal text here isn’t my fault. Like yeah I’m aware Trotsky does not literally say the things I’m accusing him of, that’s the point lol

  • May 25, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    PFLP optimisticman

    I love when these dumbasses just use trotskyism as a buzzword for anything counter revolutionary. The western left for u

    do you also think Stalin and Mao weren’t real marxists or what

  • May 25, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    krishna bound

    Trotsky’s permanent revolution is a load of bullshit that takes a material concept from Marx and transforms it into a political morality. The fact you can’t draw conclusions or observations outside of literal text here isn’t my fault. Like yeah I’m aware Trotsky does not literally say the things I’m accusing him of, that’s the point lol

    You havent made a substantial reply to anything i said so i guess we’re done

  • May 25, 2025
    PFLP optimisticman

    You havent made a substantial reply to anything i said so i guess we’re done

    You’re right it’s not meaningful unless there’s suicide involved apparently lmfao

  • May 25, 2025
    PFLP optimisticman

    R u a communist?

  • May 25, 2025
    ·
    3 replies
    krishna bound

    do you also think Stalin and Mao weren’t real marxists or what

    How about u actually read some socialist theory by lenin,mao, stalin? U come off like the typical online leftist who doesnt read

  • May 25, 2025

    yall can enjoy that

  • May 25, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    krishna bound

    Trotsky’s permanent revolution is a load of bullshit that takes a material concept from Marx and transforms it into a political morality. The fact you can’t draw conclusions or observations outside of literal text here isn’t my fault. Like yeah I’m aware Trotsky does not literally say the things I’m accusing him of, that’s the point lol

    getting off from the main topic now, but how is PerRev a political morality to be fair i haven’t read it, but from reading a bunch of soviet history in general, Trotsky denounced the work for being not relevant during the 30s cause the material conditions weren’t the same anymore (failure of german revolution) until he got expelled then he took it back up again i’m pretty sure

  • May 25, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    PFLP optimisticman

    How about u actually read some socialist theory by lenin,mao, stalin? U come off like the typical online leftist who doesnt read

    Stalin often used the word trotskiest the way u accuse Krishna of using it, have u read any great purge documents and seen how ridiculous the charge of trotskyism became, literally just ended up meaning being against the party

  • May 25, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    PFLP optimisticman

    How about u actually read some socialist theory by lenin,mao, stalin? U come off like the typical online leftist who doesnt read

    When Marx talks about rêtärding the reduction of capital he’s talking about you

  • May 25, 2025
    ·
    2 replies
    Choking

    Stalin often used the word trotskiest the way u accuse Krishna of using it, have u read any great purge documents and seen how ridiculous the charge of trotskyism became, literally just ended up meaning being against the party

    Permanent revolution is just advocating for a simultaneous workers revolution in Europe as opposed to stalins theory of socialism in one country. It has nothing to do with whatever point he was trying to make

  • May 25, 2025
    Choking

    getting off from the main topic now, but how is PerRev a political morality to be fair i haven’t read it, but from reading a bunch of soviet history in general, Trotsky denounced the work for being not relevant during the 30s cause the material conditions weren’t the same anymore (failure of german revolution) until he got expelled then he took it back up again i’m pretty sure

    I don’t have any issue inherently with Permanent Revolution. The issue is the extrapolation of it, which to be fair isn’t Trotsky’s fault, it’s just a lineage of the concept. I think the original concept of it made sense even as Trotsky wrote about it - the justification made sense for the time. The problem is over time its adoption as a principle by increasingly anti-“Stalinist” parties turned it into some form of saying “actually anything you do which supports the ideology of socialism is good”. I don’t think it’s innately Trotsky’s fault as much as being an ideological casualty of history that the idea ironically got divorced from revolution and turned into this idea that actions are/are not justified not materially but instead how they fall under intentional ideological lines

  • May 25, 2025
    PFLP optimisticman

    Permanent revolution is just advocating for a simultaneous workers revolution in Europe as opposed to stalins theory of socialism in one country. It has nothing to do with whatever point he was trying to make

    Yes, and the fact that is that anti-Stalinist parties turned this concept of advocacy over time into increasingly divorced ideas that trickled down into believing anything that is voiced in the direction of “socialism” is therefore meaningful (which is a moral judgement since at that point it is not in fact based on material change). Not Trotsky’s fault but it is indeed what happened. You don’t end up with slop “communism in name alone” euro “socialists” who think s*** like “not showering is an act of praxis” without parties that were handed down from Trotskyist origins.

  • May 25, 2025
    krishna bound

    When Marx talks about rêtärding the reduction of capital he’s talking about you

    The nerdiest way to diss someone ive ever seen

  • May 25, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    PFLP optimisticman

    Permanent revolution is just advocating for a simultaneous workers revolution in Europe as opposed to stalins theory of socialism in one country. It has nothing to do with whatever point he was trying to make

    too simplified of an answer to mean anything both of these concepts changed over time in their meaning with the respective person using em like socialism in one country didn’t entirely mean the same thing to Bukharian, or Stalin , and an “integration”vs “isolationist” into the world economy was more important during the trotsky and stalin feuds of the 30s (as well as the 20s). In the 30s like i mentioned in the other post Trotsky was denouncing Perm Rev (saying it’s not relevant to the current debates) when others brought it up until he got expelled and unfortunately and ironically started trotskyism like his opponents were accusing him off

  • May 25, 2025
    ·
    4 replies

    Stupidest thread🤣🤣thank god for the ACP

  • May 25, 2025
    fiveprestos

    Stupidest thread🤣🤣thank god for the ACP

  • May 25, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    fiveprestos

    Stupidest thread🤣🤣thank god for the ACP

    kys infront of ur mom