this will sound like the least fun way to spend Friday evening but anywhos what should I read on ecp
this will sound like the least fun way to spend Friday evening but anywhos what should I read on ecp
Whats ecp
wait biden made it so if americans work for chinese semi-conductor companies instead of american ones they lose their citizenship?
wait biden made it so if americans work for chinese semi-conductor companies instead of american ones they lose their citizenship?
Amazing things are happening in Amerikkka
Amazing things are happening in Amerikkka
throw back to republicans fearmongering about biden being a chinese state asset
throw back to republicans fearmongering about biden being a chinese state asset
A lot of stuff democrats do happens bc they wanna prove to the republicans that they are NOT an asset
Hence why obama didnt really do much for black amerikans

You knows theres at least 1 fella in the cpusa who likes both biden and mao
You knows theres at least 1 fella in the cpusa who likes both biden and mao
There’s dozens
A lot of stuff democrats do happens bc they wanna prove to the republicans that they are NOT an asset
Hence why obama didnt really do much for black amerikans
the way parties virtue signal to each other through policy like that is honestly one of my fav things about the clownshow of US politics
democrats who get in power try extra hard to prove they're not foreign assets and also that they aren't "socialists" through austerity politics and copying moderate GOP platforms
republicans who get in power try extra hard to prove they're not racist/sexist/homophobic/etc through utterly insane pandering policy
What could their reasoning be?
Just look any of their number of articles on Hillary to see how devolved that fed run org is
cpusa.org/article/hillarys-hour
The only way to defeat him is Hillary Clinton, the first woman in history with a chance of being elected. The difference is abysmal. Barack Obama did not exaggerate when he said she was more prepared to be President than he –Obama– or her husband, Bill Clinton.
Hillary has a long political career from her early years and has always been seen as an enemy by the most conservative groups who have unleashed a fierce campaign against her in which slander abounds. She has made mistakes –some of undoubted importance– and reprehensible concessions. She did not always remain faithful to her ideals of youth. But the same can be said of any US politician and none other has been subjected to such relentless scrutiny by the media – those of the large corporations and many others circulating in the digital universe. These have examined her life in detail and cannot accuse her of having committed any crime. The biggest charges against her are having embraced neo-liberalism –as did almost all in her party– and having implemented, as Secretary of State, the warmongering line of the White House.
Just look any of their number of articles on Hillary to see how devolved that fed run org is
https://www.cpusa.org/article/hillarys-hour/
The only way to defeat him is Hillary Clinton, the first woman in history with a chance of being elected. The difference is abysmal. Barack Obama did not exaggerate when he said she was more prepared to be President than he –Obama– or her husband, Bill Clinton.
Hillary has a long political career from her early years and has always been seen as an enemy by the most conservative groups who have unleashed a fierce campaign against her in which slander abounds. She has made mistakes –some of undoubted importance– and reprehensible concessions. She did not always remain faithful to her ideals of youth. But the same can be said of any US politician and none other has been subjected to such relentless scrutiny by the media – those of the large corporations and many others circulating in the digital universe. These have examined her life in detail and cannot accuse her of having committed any crime. The biggest charges against her are having embraced neo-liberalism –as did almost all in her party– and having implemented, as Secretary of State, the warmongering line of the White House.
Just look any of their number of articles on Hillary to see how devolved that fed run org is
https://www.cpusa.org/article/hillarys-hour/
The only way to defeat him is Hillary Clinton, the first woman in history with a chance of being elected. The difference is abysmal. Barack Obama did not exaggerate when he said she was more prepared to be President than he –Obama– or her husband, Bill Clinton.
Hillary has a long political career from her early years and has always been seen as an enemy by the most conservative groups who have unleashed a fierce campaign against her in which slander abounds. She has made mistakes –some of undoubted importance– and reprehensible concessions. She did not always remain faithful to her ideals of youth. But the same can be said of any US politician and none other has been subjected to such relentless scrutiny by the media – those of the large corporations and many others circulating in the digital universe. These have examined her life in detail and cannot accuse her of having committed any crime. The biggest charges against her are having embraced neo-liberalism –as did almost all in her party– and having implemented, as Secretary of State, the warmongering line of the White House.

some boring bullshit
Economic calculation problem
Obviously Im gonna recommend Cockshott for this
The ECP hasn't been a real mathematical problem for decades now
Remember it was formulated during an era where "computer" was an actual job (people calculating things, mostly women after WW1)
Obviously Im gonna recommend Cockshott for this
The ECP hasn't been a real mathematical problem for decades now
Remember it was formulated during an era where "computer" was an actual job (people calculating things, mostly women after WW1)
aighty, thanks. I just saw it mentioned somewhere and since im big dumb when it comes to economics I figured its something that I need to know about as far as funky anti-socialist arguments go
aighty, thanks. I just saw it mentioned somewhere and since im big dumb when it comes to economics I figured its something that I need to know about as far as funky anti-socialist arguments go
Have you read Towards A New Socialism?