Nobody's posted any studies ITT, just out of context graphs.
There have been arguments critizing the whole "downward trending profits thing" since the 60s, see: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tendency_of_the_rate_of_profit_to_fall#:~:text=The%20tendency%20of%20the%20rate,invested%20capital%E2%80%94decreases%20over%20time.
So it's hardly a new thing.
They're graphs from studies
They're graphs from studies
No one's posted studies, just graphs
Here's wikipedia unless you're too scared to look at a REAL source
Profits falling for everyone but not for 3 big company
don't look at S&P 500 Real Earnings Yield Adjusted For Inflation, worst mistake of my life
don't look at S&P 500 Real Earnings Yield Adjusted For Inflation, worst mistake of my life

don't look at S&P 500 Real Earnings Yield Adjusted For Inflation, worst mistake of my life
No one's posted studies, just graphs
Here's wikipedia unless you're too scared to look at a REAL source
Loool, my goodness. You understand that Wikipedia is a compilation of relevant discourse, right?
With links to the cited articles/books, right?
My man heard "Wikipedia is not a good source" once and then ran with that as a rebuttal to everything like the unthinking socialist robot that he is.
Loool, my goodness. You understand that Wikipedia is a compilation of relevant discourse, right?
With links to the cited articles/books, right?
My man heard "Wikipedia is not a good source" once and then ran with that as a rebuttal to everything like the unthinking socialist robot that he is.
fed source
Loool, my goodness. You understand that Wikipedia is a compilation of relevant discourse, right?
With links to the cited articles/books, right?
My man heard "Wikipedia is not a good source" once and then ran with that as a rebuttal to everything like the unthinking socialist robot that he is.
all it says on there is that there have been studies for and against lol
Shes doing the tucker carlson voice
and marx clearly said there were counteracting factors as well, but the tendency over time remains the same
Loool, my goodness. You understand that Wikipedia is a compilation of relevant discourse, right?
With links to the cited articles/books, right?
My man heard "Wikipedia is not a good source" once and then ran with that as a rebuttal to everything like the unthinking socialist robot that he is.
Loool, my goodness. You understand that Wikipedia is a compilation of relevant discourse, right?
.
like the unthinking socialist robot that he is.

Oh word?
all it says on there is that there have been studies for and against lol
That's what I said. It's a theory that has been criticized, so what do you do?
You look at both to see which has more merit, with the help of relevant figures/statistics.
Same thing applies to studies: the fact that it was published doesn't mean that it's God's truth, so what do you do?
You look at both to see which has more merit, with the help of relevant figures/statistics.