So the majority of the verse was at pusha and Pharrell, who recently were at a Louis v show in Paris together. The bar you mentioned is directly after “we ain’t wearing Louis since Virgil ain’t around” and you think it’s a reach????
WassGang Paris trip was in January, what would that have anything to do with Pharrell’s recent show or PushaT?
Those guys went to Paris dissing and taunting Kodak not Pusha, I never even seen them mention Pusha’s name in my life
Given the context one is clearly more likely than the other
This went straight over my head. I thought he was referencing Pharrell’s show at fashion week, and saying he was gonna sic the malis on him or something idk
was likely both
WassGang Paris trip was in January, what would that have anything to do with Pharrell’s recent show or PushaT?
Those guys went to Paris dissing and taunting Kodak not Pusha, I never even seen them mention Pusha’s name in my life
Given the context one is clearly more likely than the other
Or maybe drake would have taken them if vogue wasn’t suing…..
Or maybe drake would have taken them if vogue wasn’t suing…..
“would’ve been with them” is past tense clearly referencing the trip they already took…?
What are you talking about in what word does “would’ve been with them” reference a hypothetical future event
😂 as much as you guys want this to be about Kodak I think y’all reaching. Ain’t the first time Kodak said some s*** to drake or about him. Seems like they have on and off times through out the years . I’m 99% sure this is all push and pharrel bars.
😂 as much as you guys want this to be about Kodak I think y’all reaching. Ain’t the first time Kodak said some s*** to drake or about him. Seems like they have on and off times through out the years . I’m 99% sure this is all push and pharrel bars.
Read the context I provided and explain how it’s possible for it to not relate directly to that chain of events.
Read the context I provided and explain how it’s possible for it to not relate directly to that chain of events.
They can’t bro. They don’t actually listen to the music. Don’t waste the energy.
Read the context I provided and explain how it’s possible for it to not relate directly to that chain of events.
😂😂 I don’t need to read the context. I’m well aware of a lot of things. I see a lot of comments saying Kodak this Kodak that. I’m sayin I don’t think it’s about Kodak.
They can’t bro. They don’t actually listen to the music. Don’t waste the energy.
These guys are only capable of one dimensional thinking lol
😂😂 I don’t need to read the context. I’m well aware of a lot of things. I see a lot of comments saying Kodak this Kodak that. I’m sayin I don’t think it’s about Kodak.
So explain what connection the January Pressa/WhyG Paris trip and January-Febuary Vogue lawsuit would have to do with Pharrell and Pusha being in Paris in June…
They can’t bro. They don’t actually listen to the music. Don’t waste the energy.
😂😂 if you’ve never heard Drake rap over it’s going down we are not the same.
😂😂 if you’ve never heard Drake rap over it’s going down we are not the same.
We’re definitely not the same, correct. My brain works.
So explain what connection the January Pressa/WhyG Paris trip and January-Febuary Vogue lawsuit would have to do with Pharrell and Pusha being in Paris in June…
You’re serious?
😂😂 if you’ve never heard Drake rap over it’s going down we are not the same.
Ur talking about listening to the music. So I replied about the music. If you’ve never heard that song don’t come talk about the music cuz you need to listen more if you don’t know that.
“would’ve been with them” is past tense clearly referencing the trip they already took…?
What are you talking about in what word does “would’ve been with them” reference a hypothetical future event
If vogue wasn’t suing we would have been there together.
Would have been there aka would have been when pusha was.
Past tense.
If vogue wasn’t suing we would have been there together.
Would have been there aka would have been when pusha was.
Past tense.
But Pressa & WhyG weren’t there when Push was, they were there when Kodak was there. You have your timelines confused.
But Pressa & WhyG weren’t there when Push was, they were there when Kodak was there. You have your timelines confused.
If vogue wasn’t suing…… drake would have been there with the wassas…. When push was…..
Did the wassas have just a one time pass to visit Paris in January? Is it not possible for drake to take some people to Paris???
But Pressa & WhyG weren’t there when Push was, they were there when Kodak was there. You have your timelines confused.
The whole thing has nothing to do with when they were there in the past.
Drakes saying he would have been in Paris and would have brought wassas with them. January doesn’t have to be the sole time wassas ever go to Paris in their life
If vogue wasn’t suing…… drake would have been there with the wassas…. When push was…..
Did the wassas have just a one time pass to visit Paris in January? Is it not possible for drake to take some people to Paris???
Why would he bring them if they have nothing to do with Push? Drake & the Wass both have issues with Kodak. This is mental gymnastics, brother.
If vogue wasn’t suing we would have been there together.
Would have been there aka would have been when pusha was.
Past tense.
Pusha was not in Paris when they went, Kodak was...
Are you trying to say Drake is trying to threaten Pusha by telling him he would've been in Paris... 4 months before him...?
Make it make sense
If vogue wasn’t suing…… drake would have been there with the wassas…. When push was…..
Did the wassas have just a one time pass to visit Paris in January? Is it not possible for drake to take some people to Paris???
video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1685415036037324800/pu/vid/480x684/4dxYDlcMjDlVesao.mp4?tag=12
Don't know what to tell you lil bro