SinceKumbaya

5y

Yeah it goes without saying would be 90s / 2000s artists but it makes no sense anyway. He been convicted already too

Q3D

5y

It is not and the quote is fabricated as its cut up and rearranged in a way that sounds way more aggravating than it really is! You don't just cut a qiote up to make it say something it isn't originally saying

If you don't understand what the author is saying that's fine, but don't go around spreading false info that most people will not care to verify

Null_

5y

I understand perfectly what the author is saying, but just because they may have made some valid points doesn’t change the fact that they said creepy things

And adding the context to the quote doesn’t help at all. If someone were to say “my favorite books are Harry Potter, Hunger Games, The Great Gatsby, Mein Kamf, The Fault in our stars” and someone only pointed out the fact that you literally cited Hitler’s book as one of your favorites but didn’t include the other books, it doesn’t change the fact that saying that book is your favorite is a giant red flag

Kind of like how calling little children “Kinky” is a giant red flag

Q3D

5y

OK that definitely doesn't mean the same thing as that quote the wording is strange but what they're saying is in no way making an argument in favor of touching little girls

bloom

5y

It might not be the same exact thing but the energy is no less vile and f***ing disgusting

Q3D

5y

Your exemple doesn't make any sense

You choose to view the article as creepy, I agree it's provocative but it's not provocative just for the sake of it, it's actually tackling an interesting issue that is notoriously hard to talk about, especially because people will act shocked and outraged at the mere mention that yes kids are also people with feelings, wants, needs, emotions on the same level as adults.

Now this isn't the thread for this argument and I can sense that you're not trying to actually discuss anything. So I'm left wondering what the end goal is for you doing this?

bloom

5y

NIGGA HE CALLED CHILDREN KINKY THAT IS NOT PROVOCATIVE THAT WARRANTS A GIANT CROSSHAIR ON HIS HEAD! Wow! I can’t with y’all br.o. My god

Q3D

5y

I don't agree with the wording either but acting like they said this to justify any pedophilic activity is a f***ing reach

Mandolin Man

5y

performative

Not Like Josuke

5y

That person: kids are kinky

@Q3D :

It’s provocative, gets the people GOIN

Q3D

5y

I don't agree with the wording either but acting like they said this to justify any pedophilic activity is a f***ing reach

red eagle

5y

huh??

Null_

5y

I understand perfectly what the author is saying, but just because they may have made some valid points doesn’t change the fact that they said creepy things

And adding the context to the quote doesn’t help at all. If someone were to say “my favorite books are Harry Potter, Hunger Games, The Great Gatsby, Mein Kamf, The Fault in our stars” and someone only pointed out the fact that you literally cited Hitler’s book as one of your favorites but didn’t include the other books, it doesn’t change the fact that saying that book is your favorite is a giant red flag

Kind of like how calling little children “Kinky” is a giant red flag

Q3D

5y

B**** Idk maybe you were a Saint in your youth but most people had sexual thoughts at an early age whats so hard to understand about this

Handsome Bachelor

5y

Lol this nigga done they not gonna reduce his sentence no matter what he does. And investigations like this take time anyway, just like his took so much time, so even if he does gives someone up, they cant just take his word for it. They gotta conduct their own investigation against those individual(s) and gather evidence, etc and take it to trial. But hey when your desperate your desperate. I dont doubt for one second there are definitely more predators in that industry but whether or not Kelly actually knew some is a different thing. We'll see what happens

bloom

5y

It’s not a reach. He’s talking about “hyper criminalization” of supposed gay pedophilia when in reality Pedos are let off way too easily. There’s a cognitive dissonance already.

The text was supposed to be about changing narratives on Trans people. In what world do you make that point by stating that children can “give violence” and be kinky & corrupted. “There are no princesses”, easily makes the creepiest mic drop of all time.

You gotta turn on your critical thinking and wonder what his end goal is? What kind of stage did he set? What’s your motive for painting children as sexual deviants in an article that directly tackles their abuse?

See, nothing he said provoked my understanding of Trans people. It did make him look like a massive pedophile, though.

Q3D

5y

Im not tryna argue about this anymore because we definitely didn't get out the same thing from that text

bloom

5y

Bro there’s a way to make all the right points for his bigger message without this twisted and creepy exercise on children’s “purity”. That wasn’t just uncalled for, it spelled out a massive warning for this guy.