We still getting dune 3 this year also

All of the good things about him can be true while simultaneously acknowledging that the show was overall was not completely positive. Also, you haven't even seen the movie yet

The run he's on is absolutely ridiculous.

Mickey 17 -> Die My Love -> The Drama -> The Odyssey -> Primetime

Dune: Part Three, Here Comes the Flood, and The Batman Part II all lined up next

If anyone ever believes that acting isn't an artform, just point to them Robert Pattinson's filmography

Yall better not switch when Dune 3 comes out

Bro doing everything in his power to make us forget he was in Twilight

Just saw this last night and the whole cast shines on this, not just Big Rob . Gotta second what someone else said about the cinematography here too. Really been interesting to see how a lot of the editors, directors, and producers from the HBO RenFaire show have splintered off into their own projects. Need more time to think about it but there's definitely a throughline between that show, Neighbors, The Python Hunt, and now this.

Havent even heard of The Python Hunt

But yeah you’re right. Definitely a scene taking shape.

Safdies, Ronald Bronstein, John Wilson, Lance Oppenheim, Nathan Fielder, Eric Notarnicola, Tim Heidecker, Tim Robinson, Andrew DeYoung

And then through them, producing projects for people like the guys who did Neighbours, the Python Hunt team, that Telemarketers doc series from 2023

They were never close

I have explained this multiple times in this thread but I will explain so again since you don’t read .

You cannot be NUANCED and NEUTRAL in reporting biopic or storytelling while adding FABRICATED details to make someone look BETTER or WORSE. I am not denying he is a complicated human in REALITY .

It’s been 20 years since this occurred . The framing of something 20 years later while they are still alive is a CHOICE. That bothers me. It’s not flexing on journalist who were also obsessed with ratings during Iraq was and we’re showing us bombs over Baghdad with great glee . It’s not dissecting the architects of Islamophobia still rampant to this day . It’s going in on Chris Hansen for an incident from 20 years ago and how he handled it. I see the nuance to what occurred

While also understanding story telling and wanting to get a hit movie ironically can separate a director and writer from REALITY. In the same way CHRIS HANSEN RATINGS affected HIS JUDGEMENT

I can critique ADDING THINGS THAT NEVER HAPPENED TO A BIOPIC. Selling a tie for the movie . Openly making it a comedy . Not donating to REAL LIFE VICTIMS . While making it seem like others care about ratings or money or fame more than a cause for an Oscar bait movie that will brag about its box office on Monday

It’s a bit unprecedented to have a Hollywood movie come 2 decades later criticizing someone. We will never see it for bush , Obama , Weinstein , Epstein , Oprah , Ellen degeneres or many people we later discovered more about

To each their own

Tired of having to put words in all caps to help your reading comprehension.

How are you gonna complain about fabrications in a biopic you haven't seen?

It's a dramatized version of the events, there's nothing in there that was complete fabrication

Fabrication in telling a real-life story is something like Monster: The Lizzie Borden Story

Because they are confirmed to be fabricated whether I see it or not . I’m seeing tonight

If I knew they added in scenes to Michael to make it look like he was a pedo. Whether I see the movie or not I can speak on that . It’s not that complicated

“ there is nothing that is complete fabrication “

Yes there is .

"They are confirmed to be fabricated"

What scenes?

Robert you a mothafuckin fool for this role

Been thinking since last night on how I feel about it as a whole. I'll probably go catch it again soon. But it was good, supporting actors did their thing too.

Like what?

he never woke up his children to show them a pedophile sting where the pedophile is naked or at all . THAT NEVER OCCURRED

Brother real life dumb and proving the exact issue I have with this movie

His entire interaction with the rabbi yes he has caught a rabbi but that’s not how the conversation or interaction goes at all

No s***? Not every single scene in a biopic is 100% a depiction of real-life events, especially things that occurred behind closed doors. That doesn't make it a fabrication, it's a dramatization

“ it’s not completely fabricated it happened they just changed everything about how it happened to serve the plot “

Brother that’s exactly what I am saying is foul and is dangerous when the general public will take it as truth

Do you think a biopic has to be as factual as a documentary?

THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF FABRICATED OR FICTIONAL TO SERVE A PLOT