Yes and intellectuals are so quick to write these people off who need to be educated, not abandoned. They are the ones who need the most help.
It’s why attitudes like “fuck the south and the red states let’s only worry about blue states” are so damaging because when you have that attitude to the people who need to be enlightened the most, you guarantee they will never listen.
It’s how generations of pro-union blue collar workers have become neo-fascists because the elitist liberals abandoned them. And when their identity politics game stops working and they cant count on minority votes to pull them over the top, they will never be able to reach those lower classes they can help again. And the far right will take over.
Politics is about tribalism my friend not about what’s best for the people
Lol
Props to them 👏👏
Man said elite, wealthy east coast liberals like a subscription isnt 99 cent
That’s the target audience to buy a NY times subscription. Yes a coal miner in West Virginia could afford it, but he’s not gonna go searching for news in the same way as an east coast elitist will. If you impede access and construct artificial barriers to this information, it will only serve to reaffirm the opinions of those who seek it out, instead of educating others who need it the most.
Left bad, right bad, we need something else.. like a third.. a THIRD POSITION
he literally was d***riding futurism too
ok I mostly agree unfortunately we don't know which of the 2 options would work the best because what if the opposing government in Russia and Ukraine fails?
doesn't bring anything rn to speculate on the possible future
but it's hard looking in and not feel the need to help and I feel like most of the people feel that way and that's why we are helping them
I’m saying both must happen simultaneously
Basically Afghanistan in the 80s again or Vietnam etc
Yes and intellectuals are so quick to write these people off who need to be educated, not abandoned. They are the ones who need the most help.
It’s why attitudes like “fuck the south and the red states let’s only worry about blue states” are so damaging because when you have that attitude to the people who need to be enlightened the most, you guarantee they will never listen.
It’s how generations of pro-union blue collar workers have become neo-fascists because the elitist liberals abandoned them. And when their identity politics game stops working and they cant count on minority votes to pull them over the top, they will never be able to reach those lower classes they can help again. And the far right will take over.
Reddit Gold
That’s the target audience to buy a NY times subscription. Yes a coal miner in West Virginia could afford it, but he’s not gonna go searching for news in the same way as an east coast elitist will. If you impede access and construct artificial barriers to this information, it will only serve to reaffirm the opinions of those who seek it out, instead of educating others who need it the most.
THERE IT IS
Bombing rebel groups = having boots on the ground about to seize a democratic nation
nah this is all wrong putin is kanye america is kim ukraine is north and nato is tiktok
Who's Skete in this scenario? The EU?
Who's Skete in this scenario? The EU?
yep
Politics is about tribalism my friend not about what’s best for the people
That’s the target audience to buy a NY times subscription. Yes a coal miner in West Virginia could afford it, but he’s not gonna go searching for news in the same way as an east coast elitist will. If you impede access and construct artificial barriers to this information, it will only serve to reaffirm the opinions of those who seek it out, instead of educating others who need it the most.
I cant be mad at them for trying to make a profit gotta keep the lights on somehow
A little less profit would help them tho they write a lot of bullshit need to trim the fat
Bombing rebel groups = having boots on the ground about to seize a democratic nation
Ah yes bombing civilians is justified if they’re rebels
Gtfo
I cant be mad at them for trying to make a profit gotta keep the lights on somehow
A little less profit would help them tho they write a lot of bullshit need to trim the fat
Trying to make a profit ? They aren’t struggling
I cant be mad at them for trying to make a profit gotta keep the lights on somehow
A little less profit would help them tho they write a lot of bullshit need to trim the fat
Plenty of news organizations survive on ad based models. And when they own things like wordle, they can surely parlay that into funding free access to important news.
The way people consume information has changed and it’s way harder to convince someone to buy an online news subscription than it was to get them to read the newspaper while they drink their morning coffee.
Bombing rebel groups = having boots on the ground about to seize a democratic nation
Saudi Arabia bombs hospitals, schools and is starving 400 thousand Yemeni children, the UN says it's the worst humanitarian crisis since WW2
This is literally just denying genocide
I cant be mad at them for trying to make a profit gotta keep the lights on somehow
A little less profit would help them tho they write a lot of bullshit need to trim the fat
Profits aren’t what keeps the lights on
Left bad, right bad, we need something else.. like a third.. a THIRD POSITION

Source?
You think the New York Times would vanish if it went free but could donate or subscribe for more accurate coverage ?
You think the New York Times would vanish if it went free but could donate or subscribe for more accurate coverage ?
I dont deal in speculation