Like when I call out right wing republican about democrats, does that mean I'm a democrat now lol? Or the other way around too occasionally
People can't stick to the argument at hand so they gotta resort to pearl clutching lib bullshit
"Are you really defending Putin right now?"

I can't tell you how insane or uninformed you have to be to want Ukraine in NATO
Like unless you're a fanatic Ukrainian nationalist there's literally no reason
ok so were really having a semantic argument then when it comes to imperialism lmao
cuz if u wouldnt see that as imperialism (the land back movement) just as much as the original pilgrimage and genocide of the natives then were just gonna have to respectfully disagree on what justifies military action and what doesnt, therefore making it imperialism or not.
i appreciate u engaging with me even tho i was quite rude during some heated moments
all love
Damn you dumb dumb
Well, Austrians loved being Nazis so it's a dumb reason
You really have no concept of history
u are seething out ur mouth and not reading anything charitably
take a breather and come back if u really wanna have a conversation instead of just yelling stupid s*** 👍🏽
u are seething out ur mouth and not reading anything charitably
take a breather and come back if u really wanna have a conversation instead of just yelling stupid s*** 👍🏽
You're a moron American who doesn't know anything about history and you prove it every page
Like when I call out right wing republican about democrats, does that mean I'm a democrat now lol? Or the other way around too occasionally
People can't stick to the argument at hand so they gotta resort to pearl clutching lib bullshit
the problem is calling out the side reacting to military aggression and not having much to say about the military aggressor
You tryna sacrifice yourself and the world for Ukrainian rule over the Crimea bruh?
no which is why i said prob
idk the right answer :(
the problem is calling out the side reacting to military aggression and not having much to say about the military aggressor
Gee why would Russia be aggressive against a military pact solely existing to battle Russia I wonder
Gee why would Russia be aggressive against a military pact solely existing to battle Russia I wonder
gee why dont u keep sucking cock
the problem is calling out the side reacting to military aggression and not having much to say about the military aggressor
The thing is that it's not reacting to military aggression it's actively taking steps to provoke military aggression, same thing they did in Afghanistan in the 80s/late 70s
actual russian bots on ktt i cant believe it
but fox news said russiagate was a hoax
yup self determination is immoral (even with international recognition) if its gonna lead to widespread murder
and things that happened in ancient times are things that happened in ancient times
id really need to know what u mean by each example tho cuz idk if ur saying that with my logic we couldnt have supporter a western influenced korea or not, so if u feel im being hypocritical lmk
If self determination is immoral if it leads to violence, are you going to pin that immorality on the group seeking self determination or the one who is a perpetrator of violence so that they may maintain the status quo?
Because the pro-West Ukrainian president from 2014 is the one who rolled back agreements of autonomy and thus instilled hostile sentiments in the east which then escalated it into violence after they called for separatism from the government
Like when I call out right wing republican about democrats, does that mean I'm a democrat now lol? Or the other way around too occasionally
People can't stick to the argument at hand so they gotta resort to pearl clutching lib bullshit
No, I explicitly mean stuff like this:
People making claims like this that are basically used to say that Russia invading Ukraine would be epic and cool and kind of lowkey socialist, actual internet-poisoned behaviour
I completely agree that Western media has an extreme level of anti-Russia paranoia, Russiagate being the prime example, Russia Today is treated like Evil News Incorporated but I've seen people overcorrect so hard that they end up going for a 'Putin is cool actually' angle that arises from a particular strain of online leftism where disaffected contrarianism is the point, just as much as performative revolutionary gestures are in online anarchist spaces
no which is why i said prob
idk the right answer :(
Well it sure isn't adding a country to a nuclear military alliance that's in a territorial dispute with a nuclear power lmfao
actual russian bots on ktt i cant believe it
but fox news said russiagate was a hoax
Hillary was planning russiagate before she lost
No, I explicitly mean stuff like this:
https://twitter.com/LaborwaveCCCP/status/1494848606226026497People making claims like this that are basically used to say that Russia invading Ukraine would be epic and cool and kind of lowkey socialist, actual internet-poisoned behaviour
I completely agree that Western media has an extreme level of anti-Russia paranoia, Russiagate being the prime example, Russia Today is treated like Evil News Incorporated but I've seen people overcorrect so hard that they end up going for a 'Putin is cool actually' angle that arises from a particular strain of online leftism where disaffected contrarianism is the point, just as much as performative revolutionary gestures are in online anarchist spaces
Nah this s*** is stupid
just because Putin is someone who’s currently useful to socialism doesn’t mean he should be upheld or respected
The thing is that it's not reacting to military aggression it's actively taking steps to provoke military aggression, same thing they did in Afghanistan in the 80s/late 70s
dude why r u pretending that russia is not a world force the US should be concerned over?
i get that u hate america but since u keep asking me to be objective (which i think ive demonstrated that i really am trying to be) why cant u be objective and think of a single reason why an organization like NATO might exist?
even if u disagree with its goals, ur acting as if NATO was created to bully Russia for 0 reason, completely unprovoked
Here for an update
What’s going on?
Russia is putting out paperwork officially recognizing the two separatist republics as Independent nations and moved troops into them
US responded with with sanctions on the two breakaways
Here for an update
What’s going on?
Russia moved some troops into the territory their proxies already held for 8 years
If self determination is immoral if it leads to violence, are you going to pin that immorality on the group seeking self determination or the one who is a perpetrator of violence so that they may maintain the status quo?
Because the pro-West Ukrainian president from 2014 is the one who rolled back agreements of autonomy and thus instilled hostile sentiments in the east which then escalated it into violence after they called for separatism from the government
whoever starts violence first is immoral