If Russian state TV is calling them kokhols who need to be put in their place and purged if they resist I hope you give them thr same energy as some random Ukrainian soldier
Classically british
Feel like the top of command really put the clamps on footage also.
Yeah cause it's dangerous to get info out
Ultimately nonsensical to say an actual political leader who makes decisions is better than a figurehead who had zero power over them
Queen just sat there while British parliament executed policy.
Also it's rich for people to accuse me of a lack of objectivity from me when my predictions (when I actually make them) tend to come correct vs half this thread who initially thought the invasion wouldn't occur or was a US rumour to ostracise Russia, then predicted a Ukrainian wipeout, and a neo nazi taliban style power vacuum to happen
It really is an aggressor and a victim of aggression scenario. I don't see how the invasion of Ukraine is functionally different from a western country invading anywhere on bullshit pretenses save for closer culture and shared history, which doesn't make it less awful
Who said there would be a power vacuum lol? Most just said that arming neo Nazis who train other neo Nazis probably isn't a great idea and will lead to them having a larger and more armed presence in the long term. Even in Afghanistan it didn't backfire until more than a decade later
Also how do I love war when I want it over as fast as possible through a ukrianian victory that will disincentives aggressors everywhere
It would be more accelerationist to do nothing
You think this will disincentivize the US and its allies lol? They're the biggest aggressors of all
You think this will disincentivize the US and its allies lol? They're the biggest aggressors of all
Who is the us going to invade next? Really. If it wasn't for this happening, the us is in the midst of turning away from interventionism. Doesnt discount the awful things it has done previously but the political tide shifted away from it.
“The economy of imaginary wealth is being inevitably replaced by the economy of real and hard assets" - P
ideology will be dead by the end of the decade realpolitik the only thing which matters
long thermals and tinned food easy game
“The economy of imaginary wealth is being inevitably replaced by the economy of real and hard assets" - P
ideology will be dead by the end of the decade realpolitik the only thing which matters
long thermals and tinned food easy game
Russians winning imaginary victories vs real HIMAR missiles
Who is the us going to invade next? Really. If it wasn't for this happening, the us is in the midst of turning away from interventionism. Doesnt discount the awful things it has done previously but the political tide shifted away from it.
Aggression isn't limited to a full-on military invasion, you know that. The US is still dropping bombs on tons of countries, waging economic war on multiple countries, supporting countries in their invasions like Saudi Arabia and Israel. The US has plenty of geopolitical adversaries it could invade. Not long ago Joe Biden has said the US will use force to prevent Iran from getting nuclear arms if necessary.
The US has already threatened African countries with aggression for trading with Russia. If anything, this further geopolitical polarization will lead to more US aggression.
Russians winning imaginary victories vs real HIMAR missiles
ruskis getting pumped on battlefield but europe in shambles headed for an all time economic and living standards crisis. P rocking and rolling he dgaf about expendable troops.
if you dont live in a country with the ability to sustain its own energy production give it away and prepare for the bug meat rations
thermals about to be the new toilet paper get in before the rush.
long firewood and log burners
Aggression isn't limited to a full-on military invasion, you know that. The US is still dropping bombs on tons of countries, waging economic war on multiple countries, supporting countries in their invasions like Saudi Arabia and Israel. The US has plenty of geopolitical adversaries it could invade. Not long ago Joe Biden has said the US will use force to prevent Iran from getting nuclear arms if necessary.
The US has already threatened African countries with aggression for trading with Russia. If anything, this further geopolitical polarization will lead to more US aggression.
The us should absolutely give African countries far greater generosity
Who is the us going to invade next? Really. If it wasn't for this happening, the us is in the midst of turning away from interventionism. Doesnt discount the awful things it has done previously but the political tide shifted away from it.
Latin America and Southeast Asia
Besides, why would the US turn away from interventionism in the first place
As long as there is somewhere that isn’t doing exactly what is needed, there is reason to go in and mop up
Latin America and Southeast Asia
Besides, why would the US turn away from interventionism in the first place
As long as there is somewhere that isn’t doing exactly what is needed, there is reason to go in and mop up
Southeast Asia? Don't know much bout Cambodia but don't the Vietnamese love America more than China.
Who is the us going to invade next? Really. If it wasn't for this happening, the us is in the midst of turning away from interventionism. Doesnt discount the awful things it has done previously but the political tide shifted away from it.
Delusional
Southeast Asia? Don't know much bout Cambodia but don't the Vietnamese love America more than China.
Ah yes Cambodia and Vietnam, the only countries who exist in Southeast Asia
Not like there aren’t multiple insurgencies in Myanmar and Philippines to pit against the Chinese backed governments mujahideen style
Very beneficial and easy to stoke flames near the border of your enemies by shipping arms, promoting extremism, sending advisors, etc
Almost like another country
Ah yes Cambodia and Vietnam, the only countries who exist in Southeast Asia
Not like there aren’t multiple insurgencies in Myanmar and Philippines to pit against the Chinese backed governments mujahideen style
Very beneficial and easy to stoke flames near the border of your enemies by shipping arms, promoting extremism, sending advisors, etc
Almost like another country
The Chinese support Rodrigo Duterte? Not doubting you but sounds surprising. As for Myanmar, thats a f***ing quagmire and idk who thr Chinese even back there at all
Also you think the us are going to fund maoist insurgents?
The Chinese support Rodrigo Duterte? Not doubting you but sounds surprising. As for Myanmar, thats a f***ing quagmire and idk who thr Chinese even back there at all
Also you think the us are going to fund maoist insurgents?
Just checked and apparently Philippines ruling party strengthened ties with China and Russia. Fait enough.
US still preferred in that region though
The Chinese support Rodrigo Duterte? Not doubting you but sounds surprising. As for Myanmar, thats a f***ing quagmire and idk who thr Chinese even back there at all
Also you think the us are going to fund maoist insurgents?
Both governments are backed by the Chinese
And the US used the split between Maoist China and the USSR to play politics against the Soviets back in the 70’s, the Pentagon don’t care about ideology when they can very well get the upper hand here
We’ve funded everything from International Jihadists to genocidal primitivisrs, Maoists are not anything crazy here
Just checked and apparently Philippines ruling party strengthened ties with China and Russia. Fait enough.
US still preferred in that region though
Being preferred is not what america wants. It’s hegemony. American dollars in trade, American companies, American policy.
China is a direct counter to that
Being preferred is not what america wants. It’s hegemony. American dollars in trade, American companies, American policy.
China is a direct counter to that
20% youth unemployment in China, Joey B rocking and rolling
Both governments are backed by the Chinese
And the US used the split between Maoist China and the USSR to play politics against the Soviets back in the 70’s, the Pentagon don’t care about ideology when they can very well get the upper hand here
We’ve funded everything from International Jihadists to genocidal primitivisrs, Maoists are not anything crazy here
It's possible but it hasn't happened yet
Meanwhile russia is trying to take over a country. What you're saying would be all too pertinent if this was going on now but as of now, Russian aggression must be stopped
Ah yes Cambodia and Vietnam, the only countries who exist in Southeast Asia
Not like there aren’t multiple insurgencies in Myanmar and Philippines to pit against the Chinese backed governments mujahideen style
Very beneficial and easy to stoke flames near the border of your enemies by shipping arms, promoting extremism, sending advisors, etc
Almost like another country
China backs those governments?
China backs those governments?
Not that it justifies intervention but both of those governments are absolute F tier