If true, time to support the shadow army

But looks like bullshit anyway. Not saying it isn't but ehh seems like it

Assuming it is real, time to host a government in exile and funnel money to the resistance. Enjoy the car bombs Mr putin

It’s game over

why you capping so hard for a terrorist state, dweeb?

terror and blackmailing are russian tactics for ages. they doing false flag operations in ukraine since 2014

shelling of donetsk is the same now, just to stop western supply

Faked

Good luck spreading more fascist cancer

realistically i don't see why people are defensive about the fact a lot of weapons are going to places where they aren't being accounted for. that's clearly the point of a large part of weapons being sent...it's not some giant oversight or something. the same thing happened with the US sent weapons to allies in the middle east and parts of africa. It's not some "giant mistake" or something.
The point is clearly to basically arm non-governmental forces (civilian or otherwise) in the expectation of general civilian warfare so it's impossible for opposition to stabilize. If you're pro-ukraine, this shouldn't really be controversial nor should it really be seen as some wild accusatory claim, it's just a truth of modern geopolitical arming tactics

tv says ukraine is winning so it must be true

Sorry Mr. POOtin!! xDD

I agree

I think it's an irresponsible strategy and one I disagree with (certainly didn't help in the ME), but I acknowledge it's a strategy (albeit not a good one), it's not blatant incompetence

yall not tired, clowns? how many times have you posted fake s*** itt? only to say "oh, i don't believe anything about this war anymore" when you get exposed?

if you can't work with information, then don't. got sources on real situation at battlefront rn and it's tough, but not remotely like that

we all remember you dweebs saying "it's all western calumny, russia won't attack, it's just militaty drills with 150k troops on ukrainian borders", "russian troops without chevrons in 2014 donbas was a civil war, not russian invasion", "genocide of russians", "ukrainians are nazis" and other idiotic narratives. you are literally useless here, go back to socialism thread

Civilian Shields vs Nuclear Shields

The d***eating is insane

if this is your life rhytm, i won't judge

They have nothing to gain by surrendering.

6 month war. 15,000 Russian dead. Kyiv is free. Kharkiv is free. Russian gains have stalled. 1/3 of Russia’s military might destroyed. Russians scraping their warehouses for T-64 tanks.

Big win for Putin

They want russia to win because they've had bad experiences at tje hands of power in the eu, us so they assume the enemy of their enemy is automatically their friend instead of much worse

Elitist paternalism like this is exactly why liberalism is losing ground on a global scale right now

Crazy thing is that y’all literally said everything he’s quoting in his post itt

Its not elitist paternalism to call fascists fascists and it's not liberalism either. It's called an accurate perception of reality

Yeah mans not wrong

Should leave adult topics to the adults

They've constantly been hilariously wrong to the point it is damaging their reps on here

These people thought ukraine would be a nazi training ground by now

My favourite of their paranoid delusions is that America wanted a war the whole time

At a certain point it’s just denialism. Russia’s goal was to annex Ukraine and they barely secured the Donbas. That’s not a strategic victory, I don’t care who you’re rooting for.

America definitely didn't want war, if they did people wouldn't have dismissed the initial invasion intelligence reports as fake. In comparison to other situations (i.e. MENA, west africa), the US obviously played the initial reports with more caution, obviously since it involves a major geopolitical actor.
However, the US definitely sees the active war as a vehicle for NATO expansion & excuse for attempted destabilization of Russia. Whether or not you think this is justified is different, but they definitely view the opportunity to take reactive action as positive. Even moreso as Europe (who is cucked as f*** geopolitically and has no choice due to their own idiocy) takes near the entire brunt of negatives of these actions while the US remains mostly isolated incidentally relative to their geopolitical interests unfolding.