He wasn't comparing them because of morals or because of religion, he was comparing them because of the power they have relative to disputed government representation within disputed territory. No one would deny the Quds as actually extensions of the Iranian Government and Iran isn't disputed territory

Do you have any idea how much influence Khamenei has on how Hamas and hizbullah operate? That's why I'm comparing them and ofcourse also because of their s*** morals.
You got a problem with that? You wanna shill for the Ayatollah a little bit n call his regimme legitimate a few more times buddy?

my guy i hate to tell you this but regardless of anyone's position or belief, Khamenei's government is LITERALLY THE STATE GOVERNMENT, Azov battalion IS NOT in Ukraine. The comparison does not work because the IRGC is LITERALLY PART OF THE GOVERNMENT, the Azov Battalion is a INDEPENDENT MILITIA with plausible deniability to any part of the government. Khamanei is picking who goes to the UN to represent Iran, Azov isn't picking Ukraine's representatives at the UN. That's why the comparison doesn't work, you have to be delusional to think acknowledging who is literally the current head of the state is and who isn't is somehow supporting them

My guy we are talking about battelions run and filled by psychopaths. They are very comparable.

And who the f*** gives a s*** about UN.
F***in western made organization pretending they got morals. If they had morals they wouldnt even let these c***s in.

the only reason Hamas & Azov are comparable is because they are not the sole powers or voices within a state (and both are being invaded!). If you want to talk about direct sole state actor-sanctioned psychopaths it defeats the entire point of his conversation, because that's literally every country If you want to compare Azov to IRGC you're completely invalidating the entire argument he's trying to make, because you'd be saying Azov = Ukraine, which he's specifically trying not to do

Brother you don't have much knowledge on Iran do you. In Iran there is the Sepah and Artesh (army). Sepah is the militia directly responsible for protecting the islamic republic regimme ideology and Qods is an extension of that which actually Soleimani created.

The artesh is the actual army. People that join the Artesh aren't psychopaths but those who join the Qods are islamist psychopaths and they are sent to help and in many cases command Hamas and other paramilitias with the purpose of spreading the Ayatollah's ideology.

So yeah they are very comparable my guy.

Here is a fun fact the idiots who were responsible for rocketing down the ukranian passenger plane were from sepah.

You’re completely missing the point

Woke: remove both statues

What did Lenin do that was nearly as wrong as Bandera

No. You are missing the point.

I am not saying Azov = Ukraine.
I'm saying:
Ukranian Army = Ukraine
Artesh = Iran
Azov = Qods

Is Iran internationally disputed territory due to protracted and ongoing colonization or loss of sovereignty y/n

You keep missing the point buddy.

Azov existed before putin's special military operation ...

Qods and Azov are both militias spreading exteremist ideologies

Very very comparable

if you only want to make the comparison "people who have bad ideas", then yes, sure, that's not the point I'm denying. The point is the comparison doesn't work specifically because he was referring to Azov & Hamas's roles relative to the country they belong and the context of them relative to said country's sovereignty. This isn't a defense of any group, it's pointing out what the actual point of the comparison was originally and why the Quds isn't an apt one

Wasn't Lenin the one who gave Ukraine some sort of independence? Or let's say more freedom

Why do you think Qods was established?
To stronghold the Ayatollahs position in neighbouring countries.
Sepah Al Qods is there to liberate the palestenians, or atleast that's what they chant on Qods day! Again that is why they are very very comparable.

You’re literally brain dead

You can definately support a free, independent Palestinian state where Palestinians won't be discriminated without supporting Hamas. Just like you can support the idea of a own state for Jewish people and not support Israel and their apartheid regime

Also, Hamas doesn't control whole of Palestine. And yes, they are extremists

That's my point as to why they aren't comparable

But they are, your whole point is iran aiint under attack so they aint comparable. But Qods operates outside of Iran predominantly, when they get called in it is usually to kill the iranian protestors cause the artesh wont do it

He essentially formed the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic that has its modern borders

There is no other fighting force in Palestine

I disagree on the jewish state part theres isn't a reason to support a state for jewish people because the jewish faith explicitly bans it in the Talmud as per The Three Oaths. There is no reason to support a jewish ethnic state besides interpretations of religion or essentially ethnonationalism; with jewish rhetoric split on the religious end, and with the actual scripture they claim to obey saying they shouldn't do that, there isn't a great reason to support it. The origin of support for Israel from the west was not charitable, it was literally along the lines of "we don't want these jews here can we PLEASE put them somewhere else". Advocating for actual acceptance of jewish people living in respective countries without thinking they need to be shipped abroad is far more meaningful

But they are associated with a fully sovereign state are they not