from azovstal, they still have the entire rest of the city
I'm asking how many innocent people dying is worth it to keep what amount of land. What's the calculus here.
So what? 10k to keep these two republics? 20k? I mean this is the war you're in favor of waging.
You profess to have a good faith interest here unlike western hegemons who would see any amount of Ukraine in ruins with everybody dead to a man before Russia gains an inch of ground. So what's the magic number
I'm asking how many innocent people dying is worth it to keep what amount of land. What's the calculus here.
So what? 10k to keep these two republics? 20k? I mean this is the war you're in favor of waging.
You profess to have a good faith interest here unlike western hegemons who would see any amount of Ukraine in ruins with everybody dead to a man before Russia gains an inch of ground. So what's the magic number
Apply this logic to the nazi invasion of the Soviet Union and see how profoundly stupid you sound
Armed resistance by who lmao ukraine army and azov? Especially f***ing mariupol
That's such a dumb argument lmao they don't want to be a part of LNR/DNR because rhe republics don't have control, well there were times those republics didn't have control over the regions they do now so what happened there?
I'd say if the people of Mariupol wanted to be in the DNR we would know by now
I'd say if the people of Mariupol wanted to be in the DNR we would know by now
Lmao right that's how media works
Lmao right that's how media works
First round of the 2019 election, Poroshenko too a plurality of the vote in mariupol
What you're proposing is russia be allowed to take a load of land in which the people don't even want to be Russian.
The only people at fault for deaths is russia. Everyone else is arguing appeasement of a fascist invader
Neville Chamberlain ass mfs
The only people at fault for deaths is russia. Everyone else is arguing appeasement of a fascist invader
Neville Chamberlain ass mfs
So sending - what is it I think pushing $2B at least - in weapons to a country and not even knowing where they end up somehow doesn’t cost any lives?
So sending - what is it I think pushing $2B at least - in weapons to a country and not even knowing where they end up somehow doesn’t cost any lives?
3B
The only people at fault for deaths is russia. Everyone else is arguing appeasement of a fascist invader
Neville Chamberlain ass mfs
You're right, but Apollo Creed died cause Rocky didn't "throw the damn towel!"
So sending - what is it I think pushing $2B at least - in weapons to a country and not even knowing where they end up somehow doesn’t cost any lives?
The weapons are going to the Ukrainian army who distribute them where needed
It's a transfer of weapons from one state to another. It is good.
The weapons are going to the Ukrainian army who distribute them where needed
It's a transfer of weapons from one state to another. It is good.
I really can’t tell whether liberals like you are incredibly stupid or just straight up sadistic
I really can’t tell whether liberals like you are incredibly stupid or just straight up sadistic
You mfs are happy letting ukraine get trampled on with no support whatsoever and get angry at the idea of the Ukrainian people rising up and defending against it
Yet we are the sadists. Youre excusing fascism. We aren't
Neville chamberlain mf
The weapons are going to the Ukrainian army who distribute them where needed
It's a transfer of weapons from one state to another. It is good.
“The weapons are going to the Somali Army/Afghan NationalArmy/Iraqi Army who distribute them where needed”
First round of the 2019 election, Poroshenko too a plurality of the vote in mariupol
What you're proposing is russia be allowed to take a load of land in which the people don't even want to be Russian.
Where are you getting that from lol?
“The weapons are going to the Somali Army/Afghan NationalArmy/Iraqi Army who distribute them where needed”
The state of ukraine before the supply of weapons is nothing like the state of either 3 examples; if ukrajne lacked a legitimate, popular and democratically elected government then yeah you would be correct
The state of ukraine before the supply of weapons is nothing like the state of either 3 examples; if ukrajne lacked a legitimate, popular and democratically elected government then yeah you would be correct
You have no clue what war does to a country
Thats the final round
Okay where u getting it from that he won mariupol first round
Okay where u getting it from that he won mariupol first round
Bear with me im out on a walk
The only people at fault for deaths is russia. Everyone else is arguing appeasement of a fascist invader
Neville Chamberlain ass mfs
Liberal try not making WW2 references challenge
You have no clue what war does to a country
War does awful things best prevented by countries not getting invaded in the first place
Do you really think allowing russia to stomp the f*** out of Ukraine will make extremists less powerful? They'd be the ones people look to
War does awful things best prevented by countries not getting invaded in the first place
Do you really think allowing russia to stomp the f*** out of Ukraine will make extremists less powerful? They'd be the ones people look to
Do you think funneling weapons to Ukraine will kill less people?