It's AI generated. The image exists prior to Trumps post he wasn't the original post.

what in the f*** are ya'll talking about

It doesn't matter you're using the image to market yourself and that thereby provides you with a pecuniary benefit you didn't use a licensing fee for. Regardless of who produced the image repurposing it for your marketing efforts it's violating copyright name and likeness. It's literally Samsung v white, I get copyright s*** all the time to deny lmaoo

alevelphilosophyandreligion.com/philosophy/epistemology/the-tripartite-view

if you google no faise this is what comes up, ill join you skitzos

that's just how carti sounds

I'm sure Carti been practicing his niche Iberian peninsula languages

@LongLiveHipHop

"Synopsis of Rule of Law. Television and other media create marketable celebrity identity value. The law protects the celebrity’s sole right to exploit this value whether the celebrity has achieved her fame out of rear ability, dumb luck, or a combination thereof."

So how would you like Drake to proceed? A timestamp record? Diss record? Or another loosie sending direct shots at Dot?

I get what you're saying but thats not reality brother if we (people) actually sued everyone every time someone uses a name image or likeness it would literally never end. Youre looking at this in the vacuum or a perfect world / legal system. If Taylor sues him now she just gives him a liberal villain. It wouldn't be this cut and dry as AI is still new territory. I'm not doubting your personal expertise in the matter of copyright. I'm doubting politics / courts working out. It would only boost trump. Elections and politics aren't this cut and dry sueing would only help Trump.

The below was pulled from Feb 2024 don't know if it changed since then.
There are only 10 states — including California, Florida, New York and Illinois — that have current or proposed state laws prohibiting deepfake or AI-generated images.

This site and Reddit are not the same my friend.. not in any way besides maybe some of those idiots coming in here for info they can repurpose and leverage into karma farming and upvotes lmaoo

Did this case conclude ?

Yes Old af case lol it's seminal in copyright law

well obviously

but i’m just posting it cro, i’m not saying it’s true or valid in any way

Im just saying like we talk about Standin on business all the time right? Like if im upset with Yachty's behavior how could I condone this?

Lol it just looks SOOO fake. You talked all this s*** and now your quiet??? And the case wouldn't even go to court she'd win pre trial cuz the laws clear on the subject tbf

I get you, Nocta posted it earlier and received the same treatment dw lol

DrakeAnon

shooting the messengers

fah fah fah

get shot for way less in here

DrizzAnon

No face bass literally got my face melting

Seeing as the charts matters to you so much, how many number ones do RTJ have?

Reddit isnt a serious place istg. Everyday a new nigga on there has the same exact post “man we don’t talk about take care enough, it’s so under appreciated”

It’s top 3. It’s the album that put him on the map globally. We talk about it everyday. Niggas jus say anything

lol nah these are all loosies

Anyways Under Ground Kings😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨🔥🔥🔥