Possible. Gonna be honest. I love his music. And because nothing was definitively proven, I feel more comfortable listening to his music and not worrying about it.

Even if he didn't touch kids; absolutely nobody would give some of the stuff he was doing the benefit of doubt if he wasn't Michael Jackson lol.

If your next door neighbor Phil was having slumber parties with middle school boys; you would just call him a pedo. You wouldn't care about his story about not having a childhood lol.

I feel like ppl bring up the fact that parents and ppl lied, a lot. Ignoring the fact that it's completely possible MJ was a pedo; while the families also tried exploiting him for money. 2 things could be true.
Also possible that he was attracted to children, and just never acted on it in an extreme way.

We'll never truly know if he was innocent at the end of the day though

deadass one of the biggest questions that i go back and forth on in life

Y'all watch these

”If your next door neighbor Phil was having slumber parties with middle school boys; you would just call him a pedo. You wouldn't care about his story about not having a childhood lol.”

i’ve said this point a million f***ing times dawg lol related to separating art from artist

whether or not MJ did it is somewhat tangential, the point is that the mere idea that it’s even being looked into and debated so extensively at all is due to his stature as a musician

if he was a stranger no one would be looking into the s*** that keenly at all, and would just immediately dismiss it as pedo s*** or just outright weird

ill never forget i was arguing with this radlib c***trying to tell me i have a “duty” to inform people about problematic artists before recommending them their music, and then i go and check their scrobbles and they were actively spinning Rex Orange County while he was being investigated for sexual abuse or whatever s*** had happened

people seriously pick and choose with that s*** i swear

Nope

It's crazy how empirical the information in these videos are, and then he actually got to interview MJ's actual cousins.

How none of these gained any headlines is beyond me.

he made thriller so everybody turns a blind eye. thats hope talented he was.

a blind eye to what actual evidence

the overwhelming amount of evidence lmfao

no

So nothing. gotchu

See this is how losers react in the face of facts. They laugh it off while living in blissful ignorance

This threads gonna get locked before the king of pop gets here and that’s a shame

didn’t read

i don’t believe it never have

he didn’t do it

and the kid is not his son

Puff pays $30 million in settlement
but says he not guilty

Mike paid $25 million in settlement
but said he not guilty

Before the lock he did that s***

No… long story short the first accuser’s father not only said extremely sus things in a recorded phone call but Carrie Fisher said in her own book that he sold her morphine and tried to “pimp out” his son

In her autobiographical book Shockaholic, Carrie Fisher claims that Chandler was her dentist, and was known as the "dentist to the stars," happily accommodating questionable requests by the famous in exchange for being associated with them. In the late 1980s, addict Fisher would get unnecessary dental surgery just to obtain morphine from him. Fisher claimed Chandler could be persuaded via financial incentives or "favors" to come to a patient's house to administer d****. His license plate read "SLEEP MD". In the book, Fisher refers to Chandler as "strange", referring to him as "this freak", saying Chandler told her in the privacy of a dental visit that "My son is VERY (unsettling smile, raised eyebrows, maybe even a lewd wink) good looking...It was grotesque. This man was letting me know that he had this valuable thing that Michael Jackson 'wanted'". She describes how shortly afterwards, he reversed himself and in 1993 told Fisher he was bringing charges against Jackson, and at that time was "shocked with moral indignation. Fisher then states,

"This was the time I knew I had to find another dentist. No d*** can hide the feeling of one's skin crawling...I never thought that Michael's whole thing with kids was sexual. Never. As in Neverland. Granted, it was miles from appropriate, but just because it wasn't normal doesn't mean that it had to be perverse. Those aren't the only two choices for what can happen between an adult and an un-related child hanging out together...and yes, he had an amusement park, a zoo, a movie theatre, popcorn, candy and an elephant, but to draw a line under all that and add it up to the assumption that he fiendishly rubbed his hands together as he assembled this giant super spiderweb to lure and trap kids into it is just bad math."5

.....wow.

If that man and his son go on to claim you did heinous s*** do you go on to give them $25M?