All the people who are going to be tuning in to see the RNC following the shooting are about to expose themselves to another freak show.
Honestly it’d be in their best interest to tone it down as much as possible, but given the people they have lined up to speak, I don’t think it’s possible.
I tried watching Hasan last night for the first time in nearly a year.
Wow, he is just awful. No substance anymore. Watched for like 30 min and he just sat there and talked to chat.
Can someone recommend a daily livestreamer like Old Hasan that would talk about current events and be on top of things without acting like a Twitch streamer?
I tried watching Hasan last night for the first time in nearly a year.
Wow, he is just awful. No substance anymore. Watched for like 30 min and he just sat there and talked to chat.
Can someone recommend a daily livestreamer like Old Hasan that would talk about current events and be on top of things without acting like a Twitch streamer?
he was steaming for like 10-12 hrs daily i think
it probably was same s*** over and over for hours
The Donnie we know is back!
The unifier
people act like old men just blindly hate women not understanding that old men (and old women too) grew up in rapidly different times where the fabric of what it meant to literally live in society was different - and no, i do not mean this about anything related to social views/social issues, i mean these completely economically
consider that many older men grew up in a time where it was told to them holistically by all measures of society that their sole worth and value was the ability to attract a women and then provide for a family economically. over time, these norms have changed - consider that women could not even get credit cards legally until the mid-late 70s, and then in reality couldn't without their husbands until the 90s.
the idea of women having careers that actually competed with men - no less were equal to them - did not realy substantially enter mainstream public conscious until the 90s-00s; prior to this, yes feminist movement exists and women had jobs, but the mainstream association of men was still "breadwinner". the role of "head of household" was still seen as a primarily male job.
by that time of the late 90s, most boomers already had at least 1 child (in many cases multiple). imagine a situation where you - for at that point almost half a century - lived in a time where you were told your sole value was the ability to provide for your family, and then suddenly your wife starts to feel unhappy because they think they wasted their lives having a family rather than say, finishing college or pursuing a higher career
this isn't to blame women or social norms - it's just as understandable why women would feel that way, of course when you're told for 50 years that having a family is the sole thing to strive for so much so you don't even consider a career a possible reality but then suddenly 30 years later your daughter is able to be a PHD and CEO you start questioning your decisions yourself.
however this division between male and female boomers has been an intense cause of divorce. speak to almost any divorced boomer couple (shouldn't be hard, almost 2/3rds of boomer couples have at least 1 divorce) and you'll see some drips/inklings of this in virtually all of why they divorced - moreso because the vast majority of these divorces are initiated by the wife
the oversimplification of this is "men just want women to go back to being housewives" or "women just have more freedom to divorce abusive men" - and yes, these people exist of course. however there are swathes of old men who feel like men don't have a place in society because they legitimately don't know what it is if they can't be a head of household; this doesn't mean they literally want to be an authortiative household single income "dictator", it's that the idea of them being breadwinners to them isn't mutually exclusive to womens' rights, so they don't understand why the position has A) been deprecated and B) how to deal with that. Meanwhile, many older women view the openings of womens' freedoms as a path toward lives for both younger women and to an extent themselves to participate in alternate lives they wish they could have had opportunities for.
This is not actually a gendered topic, it's an economic one misconstrued as being about gender. Boomer men are going to be more willing to vote for candidates who espouse - NOT "traditional values" - but rather paths to returning to meaningful societal employment (not just having a job but having a job with material meaning/social effect). Boomer women on the contrary are going to be more willing to vote for candidates who espouse broader complementary social views that allow paths toward more ambigious economic freedoms.
average yap essay by krishna bound
I tried watching Hasan last night for the first time in nearly a year.
Wow, he is just awful. No substance anymore. Watched for like 30 min and he just sat there and talked to chat.
Can someone recommend a daily livestreamer like Old Hasan that would talk about current events and be on top of things without acting like a Twitch streamer?
why would you want to listen to that all day long
I tried watching Hasan last night for the first time in nearly a year.
Wow, he is just awful. No substance anymore. Watched for like 30 min and he just sat there and talked to chat.
Can someone recommend a daily livestreamer like Old Hasan that would talk about current events and be on top of things without acting like a Twitch streamer?
I tried watching Hasan last night for the first time in nearly a year.
Wow, he is just awful. No substance anymore. Watched for like 30 min and he just sat there and talked to chat.
Can someone recommend a daily livestreamer like Old Hasan that would talk about current events and be on top of things without acting like a Twitch streamer?
here you go bro
I tried watching Hasan last night for the first time in nearly a year.
Wow, he is just awful. No substance anymore. Watched for like 30 min and he just sat there and talked to chat.
Can someone recommend a daily livestreamer like Old Hasan that would talk about current events and be on top of things without acting like a Twitch streamer?
Matt Christman
The Donnie we know is back!
January 6th hoax?
average yap essay by krishna bound
this was a semi-mainstream feminist academic position in the 90s btw
The amount of posts I’m seeing saying Trump is “black” now because he got shot and has a felony is ridiculous
Like do these people hear how dumb they sound
Same energy as people calling Bill Clinton America's first black president for getting his duck sucked in the oval office
people act like old men just blindly hate women not understanding that old men (and old women too) grew up in rapidly different times where the fabric of what it meant to literally live in society was different - and no, i do not mean this about anything related to social views/social issues, i mean these completely economically
consider that many older men grew up in a time where it was told to them holistically by all measures of society that their sole worth and value was the ability to attract a women and then provide for a family economically. over time, these norms have changed - consider that women could not even get credit cards legally until the mid-late 70s, and then in reality couldn't without their husbands until the 90s.
the idea of women having careers that actually competed with men - no less were equal to them - did not realy substantially enter mainstream public conscious until the 90s-00s; prior to this, yes feminist movement exists and women had jobs, but the mainstream association of men was still "breadwinner". the role of "head of household" was still seen as a primarily male job.
by that time of the late 90s, most boomers already had at least 1 child (in many cases multiple). imagine a situation where you - for at that point almost half a century - lived in a time where you were told your sole value was the ability to provide for your family, and then suddenly your wife starts to feel unhappy because they think they wasted their lives having a family rather than say, finishing college or pursuing a higher career
this isn't to blame women or social norms - it's just as understandable why women would feel that way, of course when you're told for 50 years that having a family is the sole thing to strive for so much so you don't even consider a career a possible reality but then suddenly 30 years later your daughter is able to be a PHD and CEO you start questioning your decisions yourself.
however this division between male and female boomers has been an intense cause of divorce. speak to almost any divorced boomer couple (shouldn't be hard, almost 2/3rds of boomer couples have at least 1 divorce) and you'll see some drips/inklings of this in virtually all of why they divorced - moreso because the vast majority of these divorces are initiated by the wife
the oversimplification of this is "men just want women to go back to being housewives" or "women just have more freedom to divorce abusive men" - and yes, these people exist of course. however there are swathes of old men who feel like men don't have a place in society because they legitimately don't know what it is if they can't be a head of household; this doesn't mean they literally want to be an authortiative household single income "dictator", it's that the idea of them being breadwinners to them isn't mutually exclusive to womens' rights, so they don't understand why the position has A) been deprecated and B) how to deal with that. Meanwhile, many older women view the openings of womens' freedoms as a path toward lives for both younger women and to an extent themselves to participate in alternate lives they wish they could have had opportunities for.
This is not actually a gendered topic, it's an economic one misconstrued as being about gender. Boomer men are going to be more willing to vote for candidates who espouse - NOT "traditional values" - but rather paths to returning to meaningful societal employment (not just having a job but having a job with material meaning/social effect). Boomer women on the contrary are going to be more willing to vote for candidates who espouse broader complementary social views that allow paths toward more ambigious economic freedoms.
For those who prefer a quick TLDR:
@krishna_bound essentially agrees with my suggestion that Trump should implement "fap booths" nationwide. The idea is that this would lead to lower crime rates by addressing widespread horniness.
is that seriously all you took from that?
He’s right
His point is the the economic base is the primary point in determining how gender dynamics operate, not necessarily that gender doesn’t matter at all
men didn’t just wake up one day and decide to/to not be the primary breadwinners just based off policy change, and even then that policy change was rooted in how society organized its economy and how labor was extracted
gender dynamics and conflicts don’t just solely appear out of thin air or because one human has identifies as a male or women
First of all, men are still the primary breadwinners all across the globe, in rampant sexist societys.
Women take up a larger share of the labor market and men lash out by being sexist
Seems like sexism is the default response in both economic dynamics
Imagine being trigged by Tenacious D.
Trump threw away his old speech and wants to focus on unity now lol
"Unity"
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C9YXhU6PVc0/?igsh=MWRrdzcxb3RneHhmOQ==
When Trump wins and Project 2025 is implemented and the only artists that you’re legally allowed to listen to are Tom McDonald, Kodak Black, Kidd Rock and Ted Nugent.