Mechanical 🌶️Dec 9, 2020·1 replyok that makes sense then
Dec 9, 2020Mechanicalok that makes sense then
Yeah and all of this happened right when McDonald’s brought out the McCafe and people werent feeling it that much
String of luck
Unity 💯Dec 9, 2020NGSooo Tim Hortons (think of it as Canada’s Dunkin) used to have really good coffee but then they got bought out by burger king.
When that happened burger king switched the bean supplier to the same one they would use for burger king coffee
McDonald’s saw this and struck a deal with tim hortons old supplier. so yes McDonald’s coffee (at least here in Canada) is good.
McD's Undefeated fr 🔥
- Unity đź’ŻDec 9, 2020
Greatest restaurant of all time!
Dec 9, 2020
TdotKd should just shave the hair off
Yeah looks awful
- Mechanical 🌶️Dec 9, 2020·2 replies
- Unity đź’ŻDec 9, 2020Mechanical
Greatest grocery store of all time!
- Dec 9, 2020·1 replyMechanical
Change the W to a P and I’m shopping there all the time
- Mechanical 🌶️Dec 9, 2020Dr FyaskHO
Change the W to a P and I’m shopping there all the time
🤤
- Unity đź’ŻDec 9, 2020
???
Dec 9, 2020
Dec 9, 2020Unity seem like the type to search things into google images to find his avis
- Unity 💯Dec 9, 2020·1 reply
How else would you find a picture of a Wegmans storefront man
- Dec 9, 2020·1 reply
Damn rocket blew up
- Dec 9, 2020·1 replyUnity
How else would you find a picture of a Wegmans storefront man
Driving there
- Dec 9, 2020·1 reply
State Representative Terry Meza (D-TX) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state's "castle doctrine." This doctrine allows homeowners in the state to defend oneself against a home intruder.
Listen to the insanity of her leftist argument in support of the bill:
"I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I'm saying is that it doesn't warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate.They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed."
Meza was quick to reassure that her bill "would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves."
"Under the new law the homeowner's obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner's responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner."
"In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner's insurance we reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better." - Unity đź’ŻDec 9, 2020The Man
Driving there
Dumb post
- Dec 9, 2020AKFresh
State Representative Terry Meza (D-TX) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state's "castle doctrine." This doctrine allows homeowners in the state to defend oneself against a home intruder.
Listen to the insanity of her leftist argument in support of the bill:
"I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I'm saying is that it doesn't warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate.They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed."
Meza was quick to reassure that her bill "would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves."
"Under the new law the homeowner's obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner's responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner."
"In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner's insurance we reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better."I agree that stealing doesn't warrant murder. Nobody should take murder lightly
But the rest of that is complete lunacy
- Dec 9, 2020
he homeowner's obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion
- Dec 9, 2020·1 reply
" because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner."
- Dec 9, 2020Fundamentals
" because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner."
Idiocy
- Dec 9, 2020
What is a wegmans?
Dec 9, 2020https://twitter.com/shelovetheg/status/1026694996991389697Mechanicalmy favorite video at the moment
wild he described like my entire worldview
- Dec 9, 2020Fundamentals
Damn rocket blew up
thought u were talkin about the harden situation til i saw the post above lol
- Dec 9, 2020·1 reply
Damn it’s been 8 years since the Toronto monkey in ikea? Lol
