Jun 20, 2025·1 reply
Nortconsent!
if it means she sends a picture of her ti... dog, I dont mind
Jun 20, 2025
WESLEYS THEORYYou don’t say?
Jun 20, 2025
TAIWAN SPICEu r the definition of mid
You are a post humanity child
I pity you- Jun 20, 2025
e tSo to go back to our earlier conversation,
Abortion is inherently immoral. In order to argue that it’s moral, you have to start changing parameters to attempt to push it outside of moral consistency.
Most of us would define ending a human life as immoral. So you would have to say a fetus is either not alive or not human for it to not be immoral.
This is where a pro-abortion moralist so to speak would start changing the definition of “alive” to make it fit, which basically is already losing the argument.
…….
- Nort 💫Jun 20, 2025WESLEYS THEORY
You don’t say?
yes!
- Nort 💫Jun 20, 2025·1 replyHEJ LIIIIIT
if it means she sends a picture of her ti... dog, I dont mind
you wanna see that cat
- e t 🎃Jun 20, 2025·1 replyNort
its a debate of how you define personhood, which is something not acknowledged within your post
and im not willing to have that debate rn cus its almost dog park time. joop has the zooms.
Changing the definition of personhood is not a moral argument. It’s a semantic argument. And that’s why it’s a moral failure.
Jun 20, 2025·2 repliesHEJ LIIIIITa girl just asked me if I wanted her to flirt with me
Say yes!
- Jun 20, 2025Nort
you wanna see that cat
she got 2 dogs.....
- Jun 20, 2025·1 replyEchiBridgers
Say yes!
I said " That's up to you "
Jun 20, 2025JACKIE ARTISTIt's entitled "Mimosa" -- by cabezadenego, Mbé, and Leyblack; you can look it up.
Jun 20, 2025im sorry guys im planning every single day
- Jun 20, 2025·1 replye t
- e t 🎃Jun 20, 2025·2 repliesJACKIE ARTIST
Of course, it's moral.
It is not moral unless you believe ending a human life is consistently non-contextually moral
- Jun 20, 2025
i get into a flow state
- Jun 20, 2025·1 replye t
So to go back to our earlier conversation,
Abortion is inherently immoral. In order to argue that it’s moral, you have to start changing parameters to attempt to push it outside of moral consistency.
Most of us would define ending a human life as immoral. So you would have to say a fetus is either not alive or not human for it to not be immoral.
This is where a pro-abortion moralist so to speak would start changing the definition of “alive” to make it fit, which basically is already losing the argument.
seriously cooking
holy moly
wow!
- e t 🎃Jun 20, 2025
I’m pro choice, btw. I just feel like the moral distinction is appropriate for people to understand.
- Nort 💫Jun 20, 2025·2 repliese t
Changing the definition of personhood is not a moral argument. It’s a semantic argument. And that’s why it’s a moral failure.
no, it’s a philosophical discussion.
I’m not a huge destiny fan but you can find his debates on it. I’m pretty much aligned with him on the subject.
- Jun 20, 2025·1 replyHEJ LIIIIIT
I said " That's up to you "
-200 aura
- Jun 20, 2025
Only being cognizant of Coldplay during ghost stories onwards
- Jun 20, 2025e t
It is not moral unless you believe ending a human life is consistently non-contextually moral
It's moral if they're an intruder.
- Jun 20, 2025·1 replye t
It is not moral unless you believe ending a human life is consistently non-contextually moral
artist said the other day when u brought this up
the fetus is parasitic therefore it's moral to kill a parasite
- Jun 20, 2025Nort
no, it’s a philosophical discussion.
I’m not a huge destiny fan but you can find his debates on it. I’m pretty much aligned with him on the subject.
Never say this irl it’s -220000000 aura
- Jun 20, 2025Like a Camillimane
artist said the other day when u brought this up
the fetus is parasitic therefore it's moral to kill a parasite
Well yeah.