highly disagree. i think the last act contradicts the motives of the riddler and basically leaves batmans whole predicament unresolved — if I remember correctly.
I just remember walking out the theater going “did they get different writers for the last act? did they communicate with the writers preceding them whatsoever??”
the motif/general idea of the riddler is he wants to get back at the rich and powerful elite members of gotham society due to the fact he feels like he had no support, help, voice or attention from them. this is a direct juxtaposition of bruce wayne who seemingly has had the same background as the riddler but got everything because his parents were members of the rich and wealthy elite. factor this in with narcissism and BPD he strikes back at all of the corrupt and powerful members of gotham. him blowing up the wall is meant to be the final act because in his head he thinks this is a just payback for his life and society he grew up but as you've pointed out exactly, it makes no f***ing sense. the only people effected by this are lower income class neighborhoods, poor civilians and other lower tier criminals as shown in the penguin
The riddler I said failed narratively I agree. But I think Batman’s arc worked. I guess we would both need to rewatch to view it from the others POV
i think my complaint was that batman learned nothing at the end. its like the whole movie was driving home the point that his vigilante antics aren’t the answer, and Bruce just ignores this and goes “Gotta go.. Arkham needs a hero…”
the motif/general idea of the riddler is he wants to get back at the rich and powerful elite members of gotham society due to the fact he feels like he had no support, help, voice or attention from them. this is a direct juxtaposition of bruce wayne who seemingly has had the same background as the riddler but got everything because his parents were members of the rich and wealthy elite. factor this in with narcissism and BPD he strikes back at all of the corrupt and powerful members of gotham. him blowing up the wall is meant to be the final act because in his head he thinks this is a just payback for his life and society he grew up but as you've pointed out exactly, it makes no f***ing sense. the only people effected by this are lower income class neighborhoods, poor civilians and other lower tier criminals as shown in the penguin
Yep
the motif/general idea of the riddler is he wants to get back at the rich and powerful elite members of gotham society due to the fact he feels like he had no support, help, voice or attention from them. this is a direct juxtaposition of bruce wayne who seemingly has had the same background as the riddler but got everything because his parents were members of the rich and wealthy elite. factor this in with narcissism and BPD he strikes back at all of the corrupt and powerful members of gotham. him blowing up the wall is meant to be the final act because in his head he thinks this is a just payback for his life and society he grew up but as you've pointed out exactly, it makes no f***ing sense. the only people effected by this are lower income class neighborhoods, poor civilians and other lower tier criminals as shown in the penguin
THANK YOU
YES! im slowly remembering why exactly this irked me so much
it’s the best one but it caused so much damage to the image of Batman in the mainstream and other heroes
Is that really that movies fault though? I don’t think Nolan set out to make some perceived masterpiece…he was just making another entry in the series and it took a life of its own.
I’d probably feel a type of way if the movie was obviously trying to be critic bait but I don’t see it like that in how it was made.
i think my complaint was that batman learned nothing at the end. its like the whole movie was driving home the point that his vigilante antics aren’t the answer, and Bruce just ignores this and goes “Gotta go.. Arkham needs a hero…”
He learned that vengeance and being an angsty prick who beats people up isn’t what the people need
There’s literally a scene of him being a guiding light for the people and then helping injured people get into helicopters
Which juxtaposes his first scene where he was about brutality and vengeance
Is that really that movies fault though? I don’t think Nolan set out to make some perceived masterpiece…he was just making another entry in the series and it took a life of its own.
I’d probably feel a type of way if the movie was obviously trying to be critic bait but I don’t see it like that in how it was made.
I actually think TDKR is more guilty of trying to be “a masterpiece” then TDK was
My batman related movie hot take is that I enjoyed the second joker more than the first
Is that really that movies fault though? I don’t think Nolan set out to make some perceived masterpiece…he was just making another entry in the series and it took a life of its own.
I’d probably feel a type of way if the movie was obviously trying to be critic bait but I don’t see it like that in how it was made.
the point we were making was that for the character of Batman it was not good
It was a good movie though
Neither were good
But the second was absurd enough to at least be entertaining a little
Is that really that movies fault though? I don’t think Nolan set out to make some perceived masterpiece…he was just making another entry in the series and it took a life of its own.
I’d probably feel a type of way if the movie was obviously trying to be critic bait but I don’t see it like that in how it was made.
TDK is a masterpiece for it's time and holds up extremely well, is super quoted and referenced in pop culture, basically does everything it should do
it says more about the state of superhero movies in the 2000s than anything
OH YES
i remember thinking how they needed to contradict the motives of the riddler because he was kinda correct with his message but batman is supposed to be the hero so they decided hey lets just have riddler try to drown everyone for some reason
TDK did more damage to the joker than batman
now every joker is a serious terrorist who is darth vader level scary instead of being a sicko who just kills people because it's funny
He learned that vengeance and being an angsty prick who beats people up isn’t what the people need
There’s literally a scene of him being a guiding light for the people and then helping injured people get into helicopters
Which juxtaposes his first scene where he was about brutality and vengeance
he should distribute his billions and fund housing cooperates or some s***!
THANK YOU
YES! im slowly remembering why exactly this irked me so much
if that’s your opinion then I’d agree
He kind of f***ed all of the people he wanted justice for
Though I am fine with villains being hypocritical if that’s what they were going for
he should distribute his billions and fund housing cooperates or some s***!
Sick movie idea
Dork Jesus Christ
i think my complaint was that batman learned nothing at the end. its like the whole movie was driving home the point that his vigilante antics aren’t the answer, and Bruce just ignores this and goes “Gotta go.. Arkham needs a hero…”
Imo the point is that his specific way of going about it wasn’t enough / the answer. The symbol is vengeance begets nothing but more negativity at the end of the movie he learns to loosen the f*** up a lil bc what he’s doing is inspiring madness and more crime
I think they’ll explore this more as the trilogy goes on but again juxtapose the beginning when he saves the guy at the trains - he is terrified of Batman and runs away. He inspires the riddler to “do the same thing” as him the riddler says “they’re the same” Batman is f***ed up by this at the beginning he also notes that crime is up despite his actions
Then we look at the end. S*** is f***ed by the little boy believes jn him which leads to everyone believing in him and him literally being the light in the dark leading them to safety (on the nose) then the scene with the helicopter right after. He sees that he needs to be more then vengeance to make a difference which I also took to mean he’s gonna need Bruce Wayne as a persona which he’s been neglecting for months at that point
@Camille am I crazy
he should distribute his billions and fund housing cooperates or some s***!
u don’t get Zoe kravitz then
TDK did more damage to the joker than batman
now every joker is a serious terrorist who is darth vader level scary instead of being a sicko who just kills people because it's funny
Heath Ledger did a phenomenal job in the role, like I will not downplay that. But I do agree. The fact he drove himself crazy IRL trying to master the whole character Christopher has written adds an extra layer of pressure to every portrayal afterwards.
Jared Leto Joker tried to combine the 2 types of Jokers but he sucked ass lmaooo.
if that’s your opinion then I’d agree
He kind of f***ed all of the people he wanted justice for
Though I am fine with villains being hypocritical if that’s what they were going for
i am too but it seems like that decision was made after writing themselves into a corner
He learned that vengeance and being an angsty prick who beats people up isn’t what the people need
There’s literally a scene of him being a guiding light for the people and then helping injured people get into helicopters
Which juxtaposes his first scene where he was about brutality and vengeance
Locked in and you said it more simply than me
Sick movie idea
Dork Jesus Christ
LOL
Imo the point is that his specific way of going about it wasn’t enough / the answer. The symbol is vengeance begets nothing but more negativity at the end of the movie he learns to loosen the f*** up a lil bc what he’s doing is inspiring madness and more crime
I think they’ll explore this more as the trilogy goes on but again juxtapose the beginning when he saves the guy at the trains - he is terrified of Batman and runs away. He inspires the riddler to “do the same thing” as him the riddler says “they’re the same” Batman is f***ed up by this at the beginning he also notes that crime is up despite his actions
Then we look at the end. S*** is f***ed by the little boy believes jn him which leads to everyone believing in him and him literally being the light in the dark leading them to safety (on the nose) then the scene with the helicopter right after. He sees that he needs to be more then vengeance to make a difference which I also took to mean he’s gonna need Bruce Wayne as a persona which he’s been neglecting for months at that point
@Camille am I crazy
This was my take too
Batman was well written but the riddler was either a hypocrite who just wanted to justify his violent urges or a little poorly written
Imo the point is that his specific way of going about it wasn’t enough / the answer. The symbol is vengeance begets nothing but more negativity at the end of the movie he learns to loosen the f*** up a lil bc what he’s doing is inspiring madness and more crime
I think they’ll explore this more as the trilogy goes on but again juxtapose the beginning when he saves the guy at the trains - he is terrified of Batman and runs away. He inspires the riddler to “do the same thing” as him the riddler says “they’re the same” Batman is f***ed up by this at the beginning he also notes that crime is up despite his actions
Then we look at the end. S*** is f***ed by the little boy believes jn him which leads to everyone believing in him and him literally being the light in the dark leading them to safety (on the nose) then the scene with the helicopter right after. He sees that he needs to be more then vengeance to make a difference which I also took to mean he’s gonna need Bruce Wayne as a persona which he’s been neglecting for months at that point
@Camille am I crazy
god, do i need to rewatch this crap