paul on the corniest 80s synths ever made
dogshit writing
flop and lowest selling album

a classic in all honesty

It’s certainly an interesting album.

Experimental Paul is better then people give him credit for.

stoner album

Not really, it’s equal to like +\- 0.3cm of erect size

u cannot stretch a soft d*** to be hard bro

He’s just testing you to see if you know your Paul music

If you’ve heard Press To Play, you know he’s automatically trolling.

hard d*** is a beast
soft d*** is a wimp

to echo my take from earlier — you would think Paul would have a better solo discography than he does. It’s not awful, he has a couple classics, but still.

is there more midtles today...

it doesn’t have to be hard to measure length

Silly Love Songs

u completely missed what he said man

dang flabbit

great tune

bro nobody cares about how long a soft d*** is. its all about when its time to get to action. u dont judge a bugatti by how fast it is in neutral

Better then Radiomid

This is bait Nort please don’t take it seriously or call me a racist

Fellas would listen to Ringo.Starr discography before a Pavement record on this website

meatles

the length of a stretched soft d\*\*\* is the same as it erect plus or minus 0.3cm

Anyway

You do hft?

Why are you apologizing for the truth

But that doesn't answer my q

he won't get this you can post this 300x in a row and he'll be posting the same argument

NPC moment