Physically
Yes
I wanted to cop some custom insoles for festivals but idk why I didn't go through with it i' the end
2Pac was a rapist
F*** outta here
Eminem finished the book of rap
Rick Ross ate it
😿
To say that the person doing the most was still not doing nearly enough and still keeping an absurd amount for himself and then to apply that standard to the rest makes it a more powerful example than any obvious one he could have picked
So I really just like fundamentally disagree with you. The example worked fine and made his point clearly
apparently not enough considering he died half a billion dollars in debt
I wanted to cop some custom insoles for festivals but idk why I didn't go through with it i' the end
I'd say it's worth it
I'm wearing some right now and my feet aren't crying like usual
So def worth the $14
apparently not enough considering he died half a billion dollars in debt
Man's was still donating while in massive debt
But yea attack mj
If I make 100mil
U shouldn't expect me to donate 90 mil
Why make money in the first place if you have to give all away? Why would I work more once I reach 10 million knowing I can’t keep anything else? All that would happen is 10 million would be the new “ultra rich” and everything else would adjust, prices would drop but so would minimum wage and salaries, etc. Everything would just re-balance around a new cap. Money doesn’t have any inherent value, it’s all dependent on all the other factors.
apparently not enough considering he died half a billion dollars in debt
Well I'm not sure if you know but the timeline makes it so Tupac didn't say that when he died
Well I'm not sure if you know but the timeline makes it so Tupac didn't say that when he died
oh so he was only 200 million in debt by then
I never denied that part of the argument oh my god i even f***ing echoed the same point in a standalone post
what im saying is he chose the poorest example possible
Pac was not criticizing the person Michael Jackson/The Jacksons he’s criticizing the system that made it possible for him to be that wealthy in comparison to that many homeless/poor people. Easy point and he’s right MJ stans took that personal
Why make money in the first place if you have to give all away? Why would I work more once I reach 10 million knowing I can’t keep anything else? All that would happen is 10 million would be the new “ultra rich” and everything else would adjust, prices would drop but so would minimum wage and salaries, etc. Everything would just re-balance around a new cap. Money doesn’t have any inherent value, it’s all dependent on all the other factors.
It was an example!
I'm insta retiring once I hit a certain sustainable amount
And just working part time from there
I don't need 1 billion dollars
Why make money in the first place if you have to give all away? Why would I work more once I reach 10 million knowing I can’t keep anything else? All that would happen is 10 million would be the new “ultra rich” and everything else would adjust, prices would drop but so would minimum wage and salaries, etc. Everything would just re-balance around a new cap. Money doesn’t have any inherent value, it’s all dependent on all the other factors.
I would buy cheezits
It was an example!
I'm insta retiring once I hit a certain sustainable amount
And just working part time from there
I don't need 1 billion dollars
Im just commenting in general. Forcing billionaires to give up their money is an extremely short term solution for any problem lol
Pac was not criticizing the person Michael Jackson/The Jacksons he’s criticizing the system that made it possible for him to be that wealthy in comparison to that many homeless/poor people. Easy point and he’s right MJ stans took that personal
Yes and oh my god I agree my only point is that he chose the poorest example of a celebrity who makes a ton of money and does nothing good with it
the system is f***ed i agree i am not ever gonna argue that
oh so he was only 200 million in debt by then
Being in debt is not the same as having negative money in the day to day reality for very rich people anyway
This argument isn't doing what you think it is
Being in debt is not the same as having negative money in the day to day reality for very rich people anyway
This argument isn't doing what you think it is
Being in debt is not the same as having negative money in the day to day reality for very rich people anyway
This argument isn't doing what you think it is
he’s breaking charity donations while being 200 million dollars in debt. 2Pac picked a horrible example.
Im just commenting in general. Forcing billionaires to give up their money is an extremely short term solution for any problem lol
Apparently not
Apparently they need to give away all their wealth!