give me scoops and I'll post whatever you want when u need favorable PR = totally fine
having s***with no signs of media favoritism = not okay?
give me scoops and I'll post whatever you want when u need favorable PR = totally fine
having s***with no signs of media favoritism = not okay?
you might be right behind @Shadow374 for dumbest f***ing retard that's ever graced this website
you might be right behind @Shadow374 for dumbest f***ing retard that's ever graced this website
where am I wrong exactly?
give me scoops and I'll post whatever you want when u need favorable PR = totally fine
having s***with no signs of media favoritism = not okay?
This getting more pub than schefter asking GM's to edit posts because theres a vagina involved
you were doing pages defending her now the concrete evidence is out all of a sudden you want the discussion to stop
Bro just loves to argue
ppl dont even realize they are living in a puritanical society where we are brain washed about s***
I'm not saying there's no conflict of interest with russini/vrabel it's just funny what we pick and choose to be upset about when the whole NFL scoop business is built on quid pro quo relationships. and we are fine with it except when there's a sexy scandal
where am I wrong exactly?
i learned a long time ago not to take anything you say seriously
i learned a long time ago not to take anything you say seriously
good non-answer as expected
Bro just loves to argue
u guys are the ones still talking about it. if it were up to me it would be a non story or rather a much smaller story
good non-answer as expected
i'd have better success explaining calculus to my neighbors child with downs than trying to get anything through your two brain cells
i'd have better success explaining calculus to my neighbors child with downs than trying to get anything through your two brain cells
ah yes insults. the argument of those who have no good argument
ah yes insults. the argument of those who have no good argument
Ah yes 🤓 ☝️
I was never defending whether it happened or not. anyone with a brain knew it happened from the first photos.
I was speaking on why the normal quid pro quo that ppl like schefter engage in as a regular practice is okay while having s***with someone with no proof of quid pro quo is taboo. like hey trading stories for media favoritism is fine if it's all business related but the second romance is involved it's not okay?
You are autistic
u guys can post every new piece of tabloid journalism that comes out about vrabel/russini. the news of the day is that their relationship goes back 6 years - shocking news for those who thought the Arizona meet up with their first ever meet (not sure who thought that).
in the past when I have spoken of tabloid NFL stuff ITT u guys have given me the lipstick alley response so I gave it back to u.
You are autistic
so?
u guys can post every new piece of tabloid journalism that comes out about vrabel/russini. the news of the day is that their relationship goes back 6 years - shocking news for those who thought the Arizona meet up with their first ever meet (not sure who thought that).
in the past when I have spoken of tabloid NFL stuff ITT u guys have given me the lipstick alley response so I gave it back to u.
Nothing worse than losing your best eater
No one says it fine for “journalists” to take favors for positive PR. Whether it happens or not. Even if it does it isn’t anywhere near as blatant as what Rusini and Vrabel did. And just cause other people do it doesn’t make it right. There’s no story of Schefter sucking off jerry jones for a scoop out there
No one says it fine for “journalists” to take favors for positive PR. Whether it happens or not. Even if it does it isn’t anywhere near as blatant as what Rusini and Vrabel did. And just cause other people do it doesn’t make it right. There’s no story of Schefter sucking off jerry jones for a scoop out there
has one single piece of slanted reporting by Russini come out yet? because to my knowledge the answer is no and I'm sure countless ppl have been scouring her tweets for it
give me scoops and I'll post whatever you want when u need favorable PR = totally fine
having s***with no signs of media favoritism = not okay?
Why would scoops in exchange for favorable coverage or a planted story be wrong or immoral? That's just the business. It's not even quid pro quo necessarily, it's literally just both parties doing their jobs
Russini will never work for a reputable org again
Vrabel will be fine
It is what it is
has one single piece of slanted reporting by Russini come out yet? because to my knowledge the answer is no and I'm sure countless ppl have been scouring her tweets for it
You can’t be that f***ing stupid can you. Was see not pushing a bunch of titans stuff when Mike was there. Was she not pushing every AJ to Pats narrative she could get out of Mike this offseason?