Imagine have Brett Farve and Aaron Rodgers for 3 decades and only having 2 Super Bowls to show for it. Thatās insane bro lmao
is it? brees has 1. peyton had 1 with the colts. marino had none.
1 is a good amount. 2 is crazy. 3 makes you a legend.
is it? brees has 1. peyton had 1 with the colts. marino had none.
1 is a good amount. 2 is crazy. 3 makes you a legend.
All those QBs you named were once in a generation players for their respective franchises. Meaning they werenāt easily replaced, if at all. The Packers literally transitioned from one HOF QB to another seamlessly with no lag time lol. Outside of the Niners, thatās unheard of. Btw, look how many chips the Niners got out of that scenario
So if we are too compare, itās absolutely insane. The Niners got what 6 or 7 chips between Montana and Young? The Packers only have 2 between Farve and Aaron f***ing Rodgers
when Rodgers Alone, at least physically, is by far more talented than all 3. You can actually argue that heās all three combined in 1 QB
nah, thatās a fail
All those QBs you named were once in a generation players for their respective franchises. Meaning they werenāt easily replaced, if at all. The Packers literally transitioned from one HOF QB to another seamlessly with no lag time lol. Outside of the Niners, thatās unheard of. Btw, look how many chips the Niners got out of that scenario
So if we are too compare, itās absolutely insane. The Niners got what 6 or 7 chips between Montana and Young? The Packers only have 2 between Farve and Aaron f***ing Rodgers
when Rodgers Alone, at least physically, is by far more talented than all 3. You can actually argue that heās all three combined in 1 QB
nah, thatās a fail
they got 1 from favre, 1 from rodgers (so far).
could be worse. and i dont get your logic that because they went from 1 HOFer to another that it would be easier to get more than the 1 each that peyton and brees got.
having a HOF QB for a long time consecutively doesn't mean you have a dynasty like the niners had. dynasties start higher than the QB (well maybe not so much in the pre-free agency era, but definitely now)
they got 1 from favre, 1 from rodgers (so far).
could be worse. and i dont get your logic that because they went from 1 HOFer to another that it would be easier to get more than the 1 each that peyton and brees got.
having a HOF QB for a long time consecutively doesn't mean you have a dynasty like the niners had. dynasties start higher than the QB (well maybe not so much in the pre-free agency era, but definitely now)
Thatās why I brought up the Niners. Thatās their biggest comp. I understand winning a Super Bowl isnāt easy even if youāve got a HOF caliber QB on your franchise but when you spend at least 2 decades with 2 back to back, as evidenced by the only other team in relatively ārecentā history that I can think of that went through the same thing, one would think your chances of winning more increase exponentially. So how then did the Niners end up with 6 or 7 and the Packers only 2 so far? Especially when considering that at least one of their QBs is arguably better than all 3? I chalk that up to nothing but management
Having them consecutively doesnt make it different lol
Then how do you explain the Niners? You canāt sit here and tell me it isnāt a failure by comparison. Even if you remove it, itās still a failure lmao Brady got 6 by himself. How you spend 3 decades with Aaron Rodgers and Brett Farve and only get 2
thatās a fail. I donāt know how else to put it. I guess they should be grateful for the 2?
f*** that lmao
Somebody from Taiwan just dropped a rack on my Covid shirt, why canāt it be someone from the USA
Thatās why I brought up the Niners. Thatās their biggest comp. I understand winning a Super Bowl isnāt easy even if youāve got a HOF caliber QB on your franchise but when you spend at least 2 decades with 2 back to back, as evidenced by the only other team in relatively ārecentā history that I can think of that went through the same thing, one would think your chances of winning more increase exponentially. So how then did the Niners end up with 6 or 7 and the Packers only 2 so far? Especially when considering that at least one of their QBs is arguably better than all 3? I chalk that up to nothing but management
first off the niners have only won 5 super bowls total. steve young is a "3 time champion" but was a backup to montana for the first two. he won 1 as a starter
and honestly idk all that much about their dynasty but free agency didnt truly start until 1993. before then teams could essentially put the franchise tag on 37 of their 47 players every year, lol.
Then how do you explain the Niners? You canāt sit here and tell me it isnāt a failure by comparison. Even if you remove it, itās still a failure lmao Brady got 6 by himself. How you spend 3 decades with Aaron Rodgers and Brett Farve and only get 2
thatās a fail. I donāt know how else to put it. I guess they should be grateful for the 2?
f*** that lmao
Niners and Pats are the outliers in that regard
if i had to set the over/under on how many years will pass before another QB wins 6 rings as a starter, I would put it at 150 years and hammer the over