What do you mean they have severe credibility issues? They're accusing Michael Jackson so don't need credibility!

“Defaming victims”

They are known scammers and have been for decades, don’t get why y’all are refusing to acknowledge that

Did they scam the estate? They willingly gave up 16 million dollars for a few years of silence. Now it's time to re-up.

Crybaby b****es with their toys out of the pram because the biopic is a record breaking success

Was always going to come with the territory

Ktt slowly starting to be more rational on this s***. You used to get killed for been suggesting MJ was a weirdo back in the day on here

Some people just don’t understand the concept of changing your opinion on something when presented with new information

He’s effectively a Christ figure at this point so I hope everybody gets their settlement money. Because public perception is beyond set in stone

You just don't need any credibility (or even a physically possible story) for these people to believe what gets claimed

Most of them probably don't even know what was claimed

If Michael did do something, these aren't the right people to push that point

It's clear they're taking advantage of the situation after already being paid and using the movie to signal boost to try to force another settlement "to avoid bad publicity" for the movie and image

was it for a few years of silence?

also, have they even been silent? only time MJ’s name is ever brought up nowadays is
1) when there’s a new biopic
2) when there’s a new music leak
3) when this family is speaking on him

Credibility doesn't matter to the smooth brains who follow this s*** like gospel

U guys want him too be a pedophile so bad it makes u all look suspect urselves

Sab is a weirdo and does this all the time lol

Sab has literally banned people from this website for defending pedophilia

He’s just saying that this specific family are liars, which has been known for decades before this new lawsuit

Nah you’re right lol wasn’t trying to say Sab was defending pedos or anything like that

I just meant editing thread titles to insert his opinion

Ahhh gotchu my fault

Maybe go read the article

What Michael Jackson???? I’m shocked

Its hilarious how for years MJ abused little boys, always little boys, that was his MO - telling them girls were evil, MJ was gay you name it and it's quite literally what was alleged to have happened. He'd isolate, tell you women were evil, then abuse you. Pretty sure most of Leaving Neverland was this (the other half abuse stories in buildings that didn't exist or award shows he didn't attend)

Now one of the Cascio sisters joins the "why work when you can lie about MJ" train and they're jumping for joy because of course that's true and it doesn't matter it invalidates the other claims

Too stupid for words.

i’ve def toned that down a lot tbf unless i think the edit could be funny enough & it’s an unserious topic, then it’s tough to say no

nowadays i mainly edit thread titles to:

• update with new information for ongoing topics
• tone down sensationalizing serious discussion topics
• remove an op’s biases/misinformation they might not have even realized that was later clarified in the thread’s replies but never fixed in the title

here, i removed that these were “new” allegations, added the context that the accusing party was previously receiving payments that recently dried up, and added that they’re actually known for running scams regarding MJ

i guess “scamming” is an opinion, so op removed that

Not everyone is p*** brained and extremely paranoid sorry bro, you gotta invent situations where the swaggiest mfer on earth is manufacturing scenarios where he gets to lure little kids of good friends into his bed

Michael is one of the niggas that white America didn’t get to lynch if it means defaming someone who was found not guilty in the court of law they’ll believe any obvious scammer

That all makes sense but unfortunately This is now a Jay Electronica thread