Apr 27
NOTREOPENINGSHIBROMichael Jackson's bedroom at Neverland was two stories and bigger than an entire house. He had whole families sleeping over, so there couldn't have been any abuse.
“Michael Jackson's bedroom had two levels, but it was not bigger than the average house”
Two levels in that bedroom but still chose to sleep with children. Sick!
Apr 27·edited·3 repliesJoe might be the most normal one
got his family out the trenches in Gary Indiana in the 60s no s*** you had to be tough
media did him dirty
Nort 💫Apr 27EddoMiami· editedJoe might be the most normal one
got his family out the trenches in Gary Indiana in the 60s no s*** you had to be tough
media did him dirty
Apr 27·1 reply
shaleirose@burymeinecko
I see that @KingOfPop already proved you wrong about this topic ITT, you just won't accept it
I already debunked that dude. He used an unverified report from a tabloid to support his claim. Bill Dworin (the lead detective) , Tom Sneddon (at risk of perjury), and Lauren Weis (DA who interviewed the victim) all confirm that it was a match. This is what led to Michael paying 20+ million dollars
- Apr 27·1 replyburymeinecko
I already debunked that dude. He used an unverified report from a tabloid to support his claim. Bill Dworin (the lead detective) , Tom Sneddon (at risk of perjury), and Lauren Weis (DA who interviewed the victim) all confirm that it was a match. This is what led to Michael paying 20+ million dollars
You didn't debunk anything
You're just saying words
Apr 27EddoMiamiJoe might be the most normal one
got his family out the trenches in Gary Indiana in the 60s no s*** you had to be tough
media did him dirty
lot of people don’t talk about how the R&B Hall of Fame gave Joe their 2015 Humanitarian Award cuz it don’t fit their narratives
I hear a lot about Joes parenting style and all I’ll say is my dad doesn’t have any Humanitarian Awards
- Apr 27burymeinecko
Go ahead and post this "original report" lol. Amuse me. Also Michael's own lawyer will tell you that's why they settled. Michael was strip searched in December and paid out the settlement within a month. Please do better research but I get the sense you don't care about these victims and rather hold on to the lie because it's Michael Jackson
The child drew a picture of Michael Jackson's p**** and handed it to the prosecution who said it was a match. MJ's lawyers saw it and weeks later they paid the $20M settlement.
- Apr 27·1 replyshaleirose
You didn't debunk anything
You're just saying words
Here's the sources for people close to the case that confirm it was a match:
Lauren Weis (DA who interviewed the victim):
Bill Dworin (lead investigator):
Sneddon (at risk of perjury):
Carl Douglas (Michael Jackson's attorney) :
I put it all here for you if you're actually genuine about wanting to know the truth. But I get the sense that you've already made up your mind because it's Michael Jackson
- Apr 27·3 repliesburymeinecko
Here's the sources for people close to the case that confirm it was a match:
Lauren Weis (DA who interviewed the victim):
!https://youtube.com/embed/lhukIUm57k8Bill Dworin (lead investigator):
!https://youtu.be/M8j6KmV0QzQ?si=evR7VZ-SuuY_REnVSneddon (at risk of perjury):
Carl Douglas (Michael Jackson's attorney) :
!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkxIX5-awmUI put it all here for you if you're actually genuine about wanting to know the truth. But I get the sense that you've already made up your mind because it's Michael Jackson
Yeah @KingOfPop already disproved this, he also included the same source you did and you said it didn't count
I can tell you have your mind made up already because there was an allegation
- Apr 27·2 repliesshaleirose
Yeah @KingOfPop already disproved this, he also included the same source you did and you said it didn't count
I can tell you have your mind made up already because there was an allegation
It's the other sources that don't count which I addressed. They're from a tabloid, no actual source. That guy didn't disprove anything lol. He knows I've done my research so he sees no use in arguing anymore because he can't peddle his usual unfounded misinformation
- Apr 27·1 reply
Yall eat it up though because it's Michael Jackson
- Apr 27·1 replyburymeinecko
It's the other sources that don't count which I addressed. They're from a tabloid, no actual source. That guy didn't disprove anything lol. He knows I've done my research so he sees no use in arguing anymore because he can't peddle his usual unfounded misinformation
You haven't done any research, you heard an allegation and made up your mind from that point forward, and chose to interpret any new piece of information you learned as confirmation of your initial conclusion
- Apr 27burymeinecko
Yall eat it up though because it's Michael Jackson
You eating it up because an allegation was made
- Apr 27shaleirose
You haven't done any research, you heard an allegation and made up your mind from that point forward, and chose to interpret any new piece of information you learned as confirmation of your initial conclusion
I literally just provided you sources for all my pieces of information lol. I grew up enjoying Michael’s music and believing he was innocent. I believed the same lie that Sony set him up and he was just a kid in a man’s body, that it was all innocent. It wasn’t until I did my own research when I realized that this man was undeniably sick. Taught me a lesson never to be blinded by the stardom. Many of our favorite celebrities have skeletons in their closet that people don’t want to admit
Apr 27shaleiroseYeah @KingOfPop already disproved this, he also included the same source you did and you said it didn't count
I can tell you have your mind made up already because there was an allegation
What a f***ing idiot
- Apr 27·1 replyburymeinecko
It's the other sources that don't count which I addressed. They're from a tabloid, no actual source. That guy didn't disprove anything lol. He knows I've done my research so he sees no use in arguing anymore because he can't peddle his usual unfounded misinformation
Pedo fantasist uses the same court transcript but somehow it counts because it suits your fantasy of child abuse
- Apr 27·1 replyKingOfPop
Seargant Gary Spiegel's 1993 deposition has a lower left, dark splotch:
Sneddon in 2005 reported a dark splotch on the right side
Linden reported a light splotch:
Which one is the match
Still waiting on an answer to this
Both the sergeant and district attorney gave a different description
So which one is the matching one
- Nort 💫Apr 27·1 replyKingOfPop
Still waiting on an answer to this
Both the sergeant and district attorney gave a different description
So which one is the matching one
Been awhile since I’ve looked into the case but didn’t his description also claim Mike was circumcised when his autopsy showed otherwise?
- Nort 💫Apr 27
d*** talk
- Apr 27·1 replyKingOfPop
Pedo fantasist uses the same court transcript but somehow it counts because it suits your fantasy of child abuse
Very disgusting thing to say but it's no surprise that you'd resort to these types of insults. Once again just proving you don't care about the victims. We literally conversed about this already. The linden affidavit was never released to the public, you're sourcing a tabloid to support your claim
Apr 27·1 replyKingOfPopSeargant Gary Spiegel's 1993 deposition has a lower left, dark splotch:
Sneddon in 2005 reported a dark splotch on the right side
Linden reported a light splotch:
Which one is the match
This is so unhinged lmao
- Apr 27Nort
Been awhile since I’ve looked into the case but didn’t his description also claim Mike was circumcised when his autopsy showed otherwise?
Yes
- Apr 27·1 replyplightone
This is so unhinged lmao
Still no answer to the f***ing question
- Apr 27·1 replyburymeinecko
Very disgusting thing to say but it's no surprise that you'd resort to these types of insults. Once again just proving you don't care about the victims. We literally conversed about this already. The linden affidavit was never released to the public, you're sourcing a tabloid to support your claim
There are no f***ing victims
I've even dismissed the linden report even though the journalist admitted to using it to form the article
So there are still two separate descriptions given by the sergeant at the search and the district attorney
Which one is the f***ing correct one
- Apr 27KingOfPop
Still no answer to the f***ing question
I don’t even know the question I just came in this thread to a post about the splotches on MJs cocky
