Apr 25·1 reply
burymeineckoThe former deputy district attorney that interviewed the actual victim and the lead investigators in the case, yes. Very funny indeed
latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-01-05-me-8514-story.html
Gets even funnier when you find out the Chandler lawyer wanted to see the pics or get them barred from evidence
Apr 25·1 reply
SABMAN TURNTi don’t wanna go all the way and say he’s innocent, but i’ve never seen any accusations KingOfPop hasn’t credibly disproved so far
certain things like the photos are obvious red flags, but others like “he slept in the same room as kids” lose all credibility when you find out that single room is bigger than my entire childhood home & had 2 floors
but if the fbi had his whole s*** bugged for years then wtf are they doing with the evidence they must have collected ?
- Apr 25
BVLhighkey brag post
no it isnt
Apr 25KingOfPopSo it was an unreported settlement
Now it was leaked by the estate
It almost looks like you have no idea what you are talking about
It's still considered an unreported amount because the information came from one party and wasn't confirmed legally so it couldn't be verified. You're an idiot.
Apr 25·2 repliesLet me summarize what the deputy said “ he not only knew his skin disease that was taking over his entire body at the time was on his hog but also on his taint which is weird because Micheal said the victims never saw him naked” wow great detective work
Apr 25scobut if the fbi had his whole s*** bugged for years then wtf are they doing with the evidence they must have collected ?
Watching it
They had Jeff tapes too
- Apr 25·1 reply
EverestCongrats on having s***broski.
it's important context bc i wasn't exaggerating and i'd def ask most people i know to go home if they started up their third hour-long "mj isnt a pedo" lecture in two weeks
- Apr 25·1 reply
also im saving myself for jesus
Apr 25MJ INNOCENT
- Apr 25·1 replyNOTREOPENINGSHIBRO
Let me summarize what the deputy said “ he not only knew his skin disease that was taking over his entire body at the time was on his hog but also on his taint which is weird because Micheal said the victims never saw him naked” wow great detective work
They leaked the report to a pro-prosecution site during the 2005 trial
web.archive.org/web/20090630025648/http://www.thesmokinggun.com/michaeljackson/010605jacksonsplotch.htmlMJs circumcised in the "accurate" description
- Apr 25·1 replyKingOfPop
They leaked the report to a pro-prosecution site during the 2005 trial
https://web.archive.org/web/20090630025648/http://www.thesmokinggun.com/michaeljackson/010605jacksonsplotch.htmlMJs circumcised in the "accurate" description
is the fbi thing true and why don't you just all run with that
- Apr 25·1 replysco
is the fbi thing true and why don't you just all run with that
What FBI thing? They assisted with the 1993 and 2005 investigations and found nothing
- Apr 25·1 replyKingOfPop
What FBI thing? They assisted with the 1993 and 2005 investigations and found nothing
they had his house bugged from late 80s for years?
- Apr 25·1 replyKingOfPop
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-01-05-me-8514-story.html
Gets even funnier when you find out the Chandler lawyer wanted to see the pics or get them barred from evidence
That's not what the lawyer is saying. He's saying that Michael's defense can provide the photos or submit to a second search if they want. It's no surprise that you lack media literacy though
- Apr 25·1 replysco
they had his house bugged from late 80s for years?
They assisted with the 1993 and 2005 investigations and found no wrongdoing
- Apr 25·1 replyburymeinecko
That's not what the lawyer is saying. He's saying that Michael's defense can provide the photos or submit to a second search if they want. It's no surprise that you lack media literacy though
If the description was accurate why does he want the photos or a second search?
And if he doesn't get them, ban the photos?
Sounds mighty confident in that description doesn't it..
- Apr 25·1 replyNOTREOPENINGSHIBRO
Let me summarize what the deputy said “ he not only knew his skin disease that was taking over his entire body at the time was on his hog but also on his taint which is weird because Micheal said the victims never saw him naked” wow great detective work
Lol ignoring the fact that they said he described a specific mark on the underside of his p**** which is why you didn't respond to my post. Yall are just so blinded by the stardom that you can't see the truth
Apr 25https://twitter.com/dannywgoodwin/status/2047693611047796800
GodzillaMinusOneNot saying he's innocent or guilty. But its just very funny how the goal posts get moved when the audience likes the artist vs when they don't
He wouldn’t have those allegations if he had Kravitz discography lol
- Apr 25·1 replyKingOfPop
If the description was accurate why does he want the photos or a second search?
And if he doesn't get them, ban the photos?
Sounds mighty confident in that description doesn't it..
Yes so why didn't Michael submit a second search rather than paying 20+ million dollars (50 million today)?
- Apr 25sco
it's important context bc i wasn't exaggerating and i'd def ask most people i know to go home if they started up their third hour-long "mj isnt a pedo" lecture in two weeks
I was kidding but no yeah you’re right there is insanely comprehensive, compelling, robust arguments and presenting of the facts/lies within this MJ stuff that the fans/experts can do
- Apr 25·1 replyburymeinecko
Yes so why didn't Michael submit a second search rather than paying 20+ million dollars (50 million today)?
No you're right, keep searching and getting humiliated until they get it right
Moron
- Apr 25·1 replyKingOfPop
No you're right, keep searching and getting humiliated until they get it right
Moron
Better than paying 50 million dollars and being allegedly framed as a pedophile (According to you)
- Apr 25burymeinecko
Lol ignoring the fact that they said he described a specific mark on the underside of his p**** which is why you didn't respond to my post. Yall are just so blinded by the stardom that you can't see the truth
I did respond to
Your post that was the site bugging
- Apr 25KingOfPop
They assisted with the 1993 and 2005 investigations and found no wrongdoing
https://medium.com/@ruckerjael/how-come-nobody-ever-apologizes-to-michael-jackson-the-fbi-files-fc7efd6f0dd3
https://vault.fbi.gov/Michael%20Jackson
so thats a no
damn this changes things
