1. How is that transitive? I didn't say "Michigan would beat Texas because Washington beat Texas and Michigan beat Washington." I said Michigan would beat Texas because they totally dominated a team that beat Texas at the line of scrimmage, meaning that they held that important advantage over both teams and would have beaten either regardless of their outcome against each other.
2. What do you mean OSU would have lit up their secondary? That is not even a hypothetical. They had the opportunity to light up their secondary when, you know, they literally played them head to head and... they didn't do that? And they lost???
3. Do you think Michigan had a bad secondary last year or something? That secondary had a CB get drafted in the second round in 2024, a CB who will be the first off the board at his position in 2025, and a safety who was one of the most highly coveted portal players now in a key role at Alabama. So what are we talking about here?
I said OSU would have lit them up with competent qb play. Which they lacked last year. They had below average play.
You’re still using transitive ideas with the talk about Z team dominating X team because Y team dominated X team. That ignores what other advantages Texas would have over Michigan: at least above average QB play paired with sanders mitchell worthy Baxter.
Kent State is down 17-0 to St Francis
Good they come to neyland next week.
We’re scheduling out of conference like saban used to.
Good they come to neyland next week.
We’re scheduling out of conference like saban used to.
Makes me wonder how bad Pitt is for giving up 24 to them.
okst
Makes me wonder how bad Pitt is for giving up 24 to them.
We broke Pitt in 2022
Narduzzi is a piece of s***
Football gods plz
Why have you forsaken me
How does your strength and conditioning suck so much???? Holy s***.