Thatโs transitive. Texas WR would have lit up Michigan secondary. OSU would have too with even average Qb play
1. How is that transitive? I didn't say "Michigan would beat Texas because Washington beat Texas and Michigan beat Washington." I said Michigan would beat Texas because they totally dominated a team that beat Texas at the line of scrimmage, meaning that they held that important advantage over both teams and would have beaten either regardless of their outcome against each other.
2. What do you mean OSU would have lit up their secondary? That is not even a hypothetical. They had the opportunity to light up their secondary when, you know, they literally played them head to head and... they didn't do that? And they lost???
3. Do you think Michigan had a bad secondary last year or something? That secondary had a CB get drafted in the second round in 2024, a CB who will be the first off the board at his position in 2025, and a safety who was one of the most highly coveted portal players now in a key role at Alabama. So what are we talking about here?
1. How is that transitive? I didn't say "Michigan would beat Texas because Washington beat Texas and Michigan beat Washington." I said Michigan would beat Texas because they totally dominated a team that beat Texas at the line of scrimmage, meaning that they held that important advantage over both teams and would have beaten either regardless of their outcome against each other.
2. What do you mean OSU would have lit up their secondary? That is not even a hypothetical. They had the opportunity to light up their secondary when, you know, they literally played them head to head and... they didn't do that? And they lost???
3. Do you think Michigan had a bad secondary last year or something? That secondary had a CB get drafted in the second round in 2024, a CB who will be the first off the board at his position in 2025, and a safety who was one of the most highly coveted portal players now in a key role at Alabama. So what are we talking about here?
cook
1. How is that transitive? I didn't say "Michigan would beat Texas because Washington beat Texas and Michigan beat Washington." I said Michigan would beat Texas because they totally dominated a team that beat Texas at the line of scrimmage, meaning that they held that important advantage over both teams and would have beaten either regardless of their outcome against each other.
2. What do you mean OSU would have lit up their secondary? That is not even a hypothetical. They had the opportunity to light up their secondary when, you know, they literally played them head to head and... they didn't do that? And they lost???
3. Do you think Michigan had a bad secondary last year or something? That secondary had a CB get drafted in the second round in 2024, a CB who will be the first off the board at his position in 2025, and a safety who was one of the most highly coveted portal players now in a key role at Alabama. So what are we talking about here?
Losing Sabb, Wallace, Sainristil, and Moore in an offseason is a LOT of experience.
Losing Sabb, Wallace, Sainristil, and Moore in an offseason is a LOT of experience.
Sainristil was a second round pick, Johnson is going to be a top 5 non-QB pick, and Moore and Sabb both could very well be second round players in 2025. 2023 Michigan having a weak secondary is a complete sham of an argument
Sainristil was a second round pick, Johnson is going to be a top 5 non-QB pick, and Moore and Sabb both could very well be second round players in 2025. 2023 Michigan having a weak secondary is a complete sham of an argument
Especially when OSU had f***ing CJ Stroud in two straight years and still couldn't stop Michigan's run game.
Thatโs transitive. Texas WR would have lit up Michigan secondary. OSU would have too with even average Qb play
in what world
๐ถ
what a return.
what a return.
Have some shame man
Have some shame man
?
?
We're not gassing plays against Tennessee Tech
imagine playing for Tennessee Tech
We're not gassing plays against Tennessee Tech
i will gas a 40 yard punt return
The good news is that anyone that wants playing time for a recent National Champion, will get their chance if they want it.
that's impressive regardless of the opponent
that's impressive regardless of the opponent
So a 40 yard punt return against a local JV squad would be impressive to you?
So a 40 yard punt return against a local JV squad would be impressive to you?
put some respect on bobby wilder's golden eagles
So a 40 yard punt return against a local JV squad would be impressive to you?
yea