thats your excuse? so Michael jackson is the only man in the world that is allowed to have 13 year old boys sitting on his lap?

This wasn't just for a few minutes, it was during the entire award show

No nigga what's not normal is u trying to sexualise that s***

Because those FBI files tell you who assisted the FBI in their examination of materials. The list included, but is not limited to:

• LAPD
• Legat London
• Crimes Against Children Unit
• They asked for FBI advice on prosecution, interviews and forensics
• Computer & A***ysis & Response (CART)
• FBI New York & Miami divisions
• Department of Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section

and they all found jack s***

yet some nerd who has seen a YouTube video under 'MJFacts' thinks he has all the answers & proof

forreal bro. Even if he's innocent, this s*** is still very strange behavior.

You guys look NUTS trying to defend this lol

no smoke without fire LMAO

people can just outright lie. you know that right

who's sexualizing anything?

think back to when you were 13, were you sitting on grown men laps like they santa?

its not like the kid was 5 or 6. This was a teenage boy lol

Ima quote this when they me too your ass 5 years from now bro. No smoke without fire this nigga never heard of a lie

i mean im seeing s*** he did with my own eyes that strange aint nobody lying its right there

You are deflecting from the points made in the OP each time to somehow conclude Jackson was guilty.

Yes it might be strange. Yes it might be naive on Jackson's part. I personally think he shouldn't have done it. His reasoning made sense, but he should have stopped because he opened himself up to exploitation.

But NOWHERE does that make him a pedophile!

I genuinely don't believe some of you understand the extremity of that accusation & how you've got there.

how you guys really defending a 13 yr old boy sat on this mans lap f***ing s

S*** so everyone who gets a picture taken sat on Santa's lap being straight up abused too huh

Everything you're saying , i've heard a million times.

I'm probably a bigger fan of this man than you tbh.

But i'm not a blind stan

Trying to write a false narrative behind a picture or clean cut proven lies with multiple sources?

Seems like common sense to me.

that would be 5 yr old kids and that santa is being paid for a job to take pics with kids on his lap. s***s completely different. ur just a delusional stan lol

You are. You think it's weird because your sexualising the idea of sitting in someone's lap. That's your argument to incriminate him too. Oh he sat in his lap so that must mean he had s***with him.

u guys are crazy im out
if i saw my kid sitting on some guys lap NO MATTER WHO idgaf. why tf my kid on this guys lap. why

You are completely missing the point. This is not about being a fan. This is not about being a 'blind Stan'

This is about facts. You might have heard it a million times because it's the f***ing truth. It's out there. It's in the OP and it was in the other thread. Backed up. Every single time.

If you choose to ignore hard evidence and prefer to create narratives with selective photos then that is your problem and not Jackson's.

OP

Sexualising every thing is incredibly strange behaviour, especially where children are involved.

nothing is normal about a 13 year old boy sitting on a grown mans lap that is not related to him at all.

That boy was MJ's date for the award show.

Listen to bob jones who was michael jacksons road manager for decades. Listen to what he's hinting at

The 'truth' about Michael and Jordan is not going to be given to you if the video starts with Diane Dimond. Do you even know who she is?

These YouTube videos from MJ hate accounts really don't prove s***. The person who made them makes surreal leaps in logic and creates a bizarre pedophilia fan fiction, exactly like Leaving Neverland did.

The truth about the Chandler's is laid out in my previous thread.

Aite bro. I hope if same dude allegedly has s***with your child you actually try to push for a criminal trial and not push for a settlement from the very start to finish. Would be a bit weird if the dude that supposedly had s***with your son actually wants the criminal trial to prove his innocence if he's actually guilty. Kinda like how Kobe's accuser backed out of the criminal trial that his lawyers wanted the exact same way

are you discrediting Bob Jones? I'm pretty sure he knows the real MJ more than we do. He worked with him for decades

Imagine a dude f***ed your son and instead of wanting to kill him and or at least get the death penalty or some s*** you say nah it's cool bro just throw me a couple millions and we good

id do that s*** fr