there's a lot of incentive to lie on tory tbh same reason there is incentive to lie about details of what happened
I don't think she lied on Tory she just didn't see who actually shot her
Also, she actually lied about fighting Kelsey and f***ing tory behind her back. It's not about incentive, she actually lied about this, which would create real narrative for why Kelsey would have done this. Kelsey herself said Meg lied about this.
S*** tory may be found guilty, whatever. But she did lie about this, and that's not trivial.
There's no real reason for Kelsey to plead the 5th
its discharge with gross negligence. again prosecution didn't prove which shot grazed meg or if the gun was fired to break up the fight
is shooting in the air in residential neighborhood not gross discharge?
is shooting in the air in residential neighborhood not gross discharge?
goes to intent, and the jury decides that based on if the prosecution PROVED why it was fired
Ok this is good. Heading to meet up with a shorty can’t be distracted with this. See you boys tomorrow.
Love ya.
The jury in Tory Lanez’s trial is coming back tomorrow at 9 a.m. for continued deliberations.
sounds like assault charge is a no. so just the other two
Willfully and on purpose
Sounds like...nvm
It’s looking bad for him
there's a lot of incentive to lie on tory tbh same reason there is incentive to lie about details of what happened
ain't u the nigga who lost the versus against KENDRICK LAMAR?
The shambles has already begun lmfao
https://twitter.com/nottrambraxton/status/1605942761420627968ain't u the nigga who lost the versus against KENDRICK LAMAR?
and? wayne lost next verzuz too and 7 out of 8 songs that won i used 💀💀
jury focusing heavily on "intent" based on their second request for clarification.
they are likely looking at penal code 246.3:
(a) Except as otherwise authorized by law, any person who willfully discharges a firearm in a grossly negligent manner which could result in injury or death to a person is guilty of a public offense and shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170.
Idc about the verdict outside of the hope that genuine justice is served on both sides.
At the end of the day, she was shot and I truly do not believe she has much, if any incentive to lie on Tory.
There is the slight possibility Kelsey being the shooter, but what would be Tory's incentive to keep it going for this long as opposed to just being cooperative since his freedom/reputation is on the line?
It's sad that we are using the verdict as a means to live vicarously in our own beliefs as if the ruling is going to actually tell the whole, objective truth, because it's evident that it didn't.
I agree with everything but the incentive to lie . She has had little incentive to lie about most of the things she lied about so far but she still lied anyways. I’m not saying tory 100% didn’t do it but idk what she’s shown so far to paint her as more honest than the other two parties.
Post also describes pretty much every “if the shoe were on the other foot” type argument in politics too
jury focusing heavily on "intent" based on their second request for clarification.
they are likely looking at penal code 246.3:
(a) Except as otherwise authorized by law, any person who willfully discharges a firearm in a grossly negligent manner which could result in injury or death to a person is guilty of a public offense and shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170.
So theyre sure he shot
Ok this is good. Heading to meet up with a shorty can’t be distracted with this. See you boys tomorrow.
Love ya.
no way this trial is actually disrupting your personal life