Thread was locked by
a moderator
  • KILLA CAM 300

    We getting a verdict this week?

    Wednesday

  • IHS

    There are others calling Megan "Marcus" ITT.

    Always felt a lil racist

  • Dec 19, 2022
    ·
    2 replies
    VA7a

    Kelsey testimony is ADMITTED as EVIDENCE which counts just as much as her most recent testimony.

    No it's not lol. Wasn't made under oath and her conflating statements essentially make her worthless as a witness.

  • I am not sure how Kelsey's interview is taken as truth...and her testimony on the stand isn't.

    If she was compromised last week, then she could have been compromised in September, when she had 2 years+ to prepare her version of events that could have protected her.

    🤷🏿‍♂️

  • Everything

    No it's not lol. Wasn't made under oath and her conflating statements essentially make her worthless as a witness.

    Yeah, the threat of potential perjury and being under oath has to matter, right?

    You can't take the interview (without any police presence) as valid and take the testimony under oath as BS.

    I mean you could and maybe the jury will! But that sounds weird

  • Dec 19, 2022
    IHS

    There are others calling Megan "Marcus" ITT.

    Smh I’m sure there is

  • Dec 19, 2022
    Babaláwo

    This nigga gonna find a way to mention Papi or be damned

    Lmaoo nigga brought up sales in a trial thread

  • Dec 19, 2022
    ·
    1 reply

    Wait so technically if they gave Kelsey immunity and IF it comes out that she did it nothing will happen to her she just going to go on about her life?

    Can Meg sue her legal team for protecting one of her alleged attackers?

  • IHS

    There are others calling Megan "Marcus" ITT.

    @ROLF ayoooo 😭😭😭😭

  • Dec 19, 2022
    ·
    1 reply

    Call OG to the stand

  • Dec 19, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    KILLA CAM 300

    Wait so technically if they gave Kelsey immunity and IF it comes out that she did it nothing will happen to her she just going to go on about her life?

    Can Meg sue her legal team for protecting one of her alleged attackers?

    They gave her immunity, she was under oath, and she still outright said she didn't see Tory shoot meg, said she panicked and doesn't know why she sent those text msgs, and pled the 5th in regards to her comments responding to Tory saying "I'll shoot you"

    Pretty damning s*** if you ask me

    But nothing will happen to Kelsey because she played the "I don't remember" card. Can't prove that she's lying, other than her literally saying that she did in that interview

  • Dec 19, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    BrickellBayside

    They gave her immunity, she was under oath, and she still outright said she didn't see Tory shoot meg, said she panicked and doesn't know why she sent those text msgs, and pled the 5th in regards to her comments responding to Tory saying "I'll shoot you"

    Pretty damning s*** if you ask me

    But nothing will happen to Kelsey because she played the "I don't remember" card. Can't prove that she's lying, other than her literally saying that she did in that interview

    Ik but im saying IF after all this she (Kelsey) was the shooter and the prosecution or whoever gave her immunity…does it mean nothing happens to her?

  • Dec 19, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    BrickellBayside

    Kelsey is completely unreliable and Justin has not taken the stand / cannot be found, rolling stone article aside

    Kelsey's September interview is 100% as valid as her testimony on the stand, in which she herself said she lied in the interview. She also pled the 5th to multiple questions. (But didn't plead the 5th to accusations of being paid off) Why would she do this if she had nothing to hide?

    I have said gun to my head, tory probably did it but not being able to conclude his DNA being on the gun, with residue from both he and Harris and Harris admitting to lying is...reasonable doubt??? I am not a lawyer but that sounds like reasonable doubt to me.

    Your first comment is personal opinion
    Your second comment is valid that it calls her credibility into question however their is a reason that she would lie because she is the WIFE of 1501 Entertainment CEO who are already in a legal battle with Meg. Also Her reason for coming to the interview is because “Meg didn’t defend me in any of her statements”

    3rd The Burden of Proof for Criminal Trials are beyond a reasonable doubt but there’s three people with who at one point accused Tory of shooting Meg. Tory has been accused of paying mfs off or at least attempting to. And he’s sent multiple messages to different people apologizing. Immediate texts from the situation says Tory did it. The evidence on the brink right now but its close.

    I think Tory shot her but it is possible that there was a struggle for the gun with Kelsey.

  • Dec 19, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    KILLA CAM 300

    Ik but im saying IF after all this she (Kelsey) was the shooter and the prosecution or whoever gave her immunity…does it mean nothing happens to her?

    I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure nothing would happen to her.

    In court, they told her almost verbatim that she would not, under any circumstance, be prosecuted for this crime so long as she doesn't lie about the events of that night under oath

  • Dec 19, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Everything

    No it's not lol. Wasn't made under oath and her conflating statements essentially make her worthless as a witness.

    It is though Dude. I am an actual law student. They would not play it in court if all of it wasnt admitted for Evidence You guys know nothing about this procedure

  • Dec 19, 2022
    BrickellBayside

    I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure nothing would happen to her.

    In court, they told her almost verbatim that she would not, under any circumstance, be prosecuted for this crime so long as she doesn't lie about the events of that night under oath

    Crazy

  • Dec 19, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    VA7a

    Your first comment is personal opinion
    Your second comment is valid that it calls her credibility into question however their is a reason that she would lie because she is the WIFE of 1501 Entertainment CEO who are already in a legal battle with Meg. Also Her reason for coming to the interview is because “Meg didn’t defend me in any of her statements”

    3rd The Burden of Proof for Criminal Trials are beyond a reasonable doubt but there’s three people with who at one point accused Tory of shooting Meg. Tory has been accused of paying mfs off or at least attempting to. And he’s sent multiple messages to different people apologizing. Immediate texts from the situation says Tory did it. The evidence on the brink right now but its close.

    I think Tory shot her but it is possible that there was a struggle for the gun with Kelsey.

    I believe that Tory shot her and that Kelsey severely downplayed her involvement, hence her switching up under oath. Not her being paid off, or having a grudge against Meg. She under oath, with the threat of perjury said that she didn't get paid for her testimony 🤷🏿‍♂️. So how then, can one say her testimony was tainted...but the September interview wasn't?

    It really doesn't make sense for her to say she didn't see Tory shoot meg, when she's the only other person that could have committed the crime

    The whole wife of the 1501 thing is pure internet s*** ion really give that too much credence. Like that's starting to flirt with conspiracy territory IMO

    To me, the only real facts that matter is the lack of conclusive evidence with DNA, and residue being on both Tory and Kelsey. That's reasonable doubt to me, period.

  • POOM POOM DOOM

    How did they get that statement from a missing body guard?

    He was doing security for the world cup last time I heard

  • Dec 19, 2022

    Trial broke for lunch about 10 minutes early after prosecutors cruised through two witnesses in 40 minutes. Jurors already are familiar with both: The first was LAPD Officer Sandra Cabral, who was one of the officers who pulled Tory's Escalade over after the shooting.

  • Dec 19, 2022

    Prosecutors recalled Officer Cabral as a witness to introduce additional body camera footage showing Kelsey after police stopped them. "She was distraught, crying" asked Meg if she was OK. In cross, Tory's lawyer asked her if she say Tory's demeanor, and how upset he was.

  • Dec 19, 2022
    KIN
    !https://youtu.be/LqBbLZSLQII

    Call OG to the stand

    😭😭

  • Dec 19, 2022

    Cabral said in cross her job was to tend to Kelsey, while other officers were assigned to Tory and his driver and Meg. She said she can't comment on Tory's demeanor. When Tory's lawyer George Mgdesyan asked if she heard Tory ask if she was OK, Cabral said, "I did not hear that."

  • Dec 19, 2022
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    BrickellBayside

    I believe that Tory shot her and that Kelsey severely downplayed her involvement, hence her switching up under oath. Not her being paid off, or having a grudge against Meg. She under oath, with the threat of perjury said that she didn't get paid for her testimony 🤷🏿‍♂️. So how then, can one say her testimony was tainted...but the September interview wasn't?

    It really doesn't make sense for her to say she didn't see Tory shoot meg, when she's the only other person that could have committed the crime

    The whole wife of the 1501 thing is pure internet s*** ion really give that too much credence. Like that's starting to flirt with conspiracy territory IMO

    To me, the only real facts that matter is the lack of conclusive evidence with DNA, and residue being on both Tory and Kelsey. That's reasonable doubt to me, period.

    The 1501 thing is very relevant considering that the CEO hung out with Tory Lanez afterwards and said # protectblackmen.

    And I’ve looked it up and it seems that they are actually engaged and she was pregnant by him.

    The lack of DNA just means they probably cleaned the gun afterwards.

  • Dec 19, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    VA7a
    · edited

    The 1501 thing is very relevant considering that the CEO hung out with Tory Lanez afterwards and said # protectblackmen.

    And I’ve looked it up and it seems that they are actually engaged and she was pregnant by him.

    The lack of DNA just means they probably cleaned the gun afterwards.

    It's irrelevant in that you can't actually prove that her involvement with has any barring on the outcome of the case. It's fodder, in that regard

Thread was locked by
a moderator