I ain’t debating that we talking live action

agreed

i think i'm more so invested in the novelty of seeing three live action spider-men together. it's kinda like how it was for infinity war and endgame - those movies feel more like events than movies to me

i also think regardless of what happens in the movie, sam raimi's spider-man 2 will still be the best live action spidey movie. you're inherently going to lose a lot of intimate moments in NWH just based off it's scale and ambition imo

acting like Holland wasn’t a broke boy.

Stark never strapped this guy with any cash at all, you know Stark was letting the homies starve

the reason spider-man 2 is so great is because it's a peter parker movie first and a spider-man movie second

a lot of the mcu movies play into the novelty that they're superhero movies first imo

When tobey is just reading poetry and waiting for his clothes to dry at the laundromat moments fr

If Peter Parker is an unlikeable f*** boy that i don’t root for then i’m zonked out sorry not sorry

Holland would never assault his ex

He not a f*** boy like that

Didn’t see this in theatres. May as well this at home

HE DIDN'T HIT HER IT WAS THE SYMBIOTE

It’s a good time! Watch it on Thursday, you’ll have fun

Can’t believe they were going after Simu like that couple months ago mans a legend

You tripping

30 DAYS

I prefer homecoming for the coming of age-ness but they both top tier

WOAT opinion

Literally homecoming

definitely not

EMERY PACK CONTINUING INTO DAY 2

I am in no way exaggerating in anyway shape or form when I say I think anyone who says Homecoming or Far From home are better MOVIES not cinematic movies, special effects, visuals, or comic accurate MOVIES than Spider Man 1 and 2 I will just never see eye to eye with.

Are homecoming and far from home better visual, comic book accurate, budget ? yes in some ways but they came 15 years later.......

Do they lack a lot of their own DNA because they are so entrenched in Avengers, Iron Man, Civil War than they need to be ? yes

Does him being in high school all of these movies even if they are trying to tell the story slow affect things? yes especially because it can be argued that their world building lacks because they barely spend time in New York, he is given a suit, s*** he is given suits

we dont see him learn his powers because he has been spider man for a lil bit when this definitely a character where they would have benefitted from showing what he was doing BEFORE HE MET TONY STARK. I am not saying we needed to see Uncle Ben die or spider bite but a lot of that EARLY SPIDER MAN BEFORE HE HANDED A TECH SUIT WITH A KILL MODE IS IMPORTANT

SEEING SPIDERMAN IN POVERTY AND BE FRIENDLY NEIGHBORHOOD SPIDER MAN BEFORE SAVING THE UNIVERSE, DISAPEARING, SOLVING A CIVIL WAR BETWEEN SUPER HEROES

IS IMPORTANT

its alternating stakes

so was Tobey crying corny and some of the acting that feels dated ? yes

but as movies by themselves they are infinitely better

all these paragraphs of what you want to see in a spider man movie wont change my opinion man.

its cool that you dont like them and you prefer the old ones i have no problem with that.

i like homecoming more

Nah I respect that I just didn't want to be like "homecoming far from home mid"

Delay this mid due to leaks + Grace Randolph and let Matrix take over end of year

I absolutely love FFH so much